Literature DB >> 3681557

Energetics and mechanics of nutritive sucking in the preterm and term neonate.

L Jain1, E Sivieri, S Abbasi, V K Bhutani.   

Abstract

Energetics and mechanics of sucking in preterm and term neonates were determined by simultaneous records of intraoral pressure, flow, volume, and work of individual sucks. Nine term infants (mean postconceptional age: 38.6 +/- 0.7 SD weeks; mean postnatal age: 18.4 +/- 6.1 SD days) and nine preterm infants (mean postconceptional age: 35.2 +/- 0.7 SD weeks; mean postnatal age: 21.9 +/- 5.4 SD days) were studied under identical feeding conditions. Preterm infants generated significantly lower peak pressure (mean values of 48.5 cm H2O compared with 65.5 cm H2O in term infants; P less than 0.01), and the volume ingested per such was generally less than or equal to 0.5 mL. Term infants demonstrated a higher frequency of sucking, a well-defined suck-pause pattern, and a higher minute consumption of formula. Energy and caloric expenditure estimations revealed significantly lower work performed by preterm infants for isovolumic feeds (1190 g/cm/dL in preterm infants compared with 2030 g.cm/dL formula ingested in term infants; P less than 0.01). Furthermore, work performed by term infants was disproportionately higher for volumes greater than or equal to 0.5 mL ingested. This study indicates that preterm infants expend less energy than term infants to suck the same volume of feed and also describes an objective technique to evaluate nutritive sucking during growth and development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3681557     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80213-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  8 in total

1.  Does the choice of bottle nipple affect the oral feeding performance of very-low-birthweight (VLBW) infants?

Authors:  C E Scheel; Richard J Schanler; Chantal Lau
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.299

2.  Design of wireless multi-parameter monitoring system for oral feeding of premature infants.

Authors:  Yu-Lin Wang; Hsing-Chien Kuo; Lin-Yu Wang; Mei-Ju Ko; Bor-Shyh Lin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Assessment of sensorial oral stimulation in infants with suck feeding disabilities.

Authors:  M E Rendón-Macías; L A Cruz-Perez; M R Mosco-Peralta; M M Saraiba-Russell; S Levi-Tajfeld; M G Morales-López
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Mechanics of sucking: comparison between bottle feeding and breastfeeding.

Authors:  Angel Moral; Ignasi Bolibar; Gloria Seguranyes; Josep M Ustrell; Gloria Sebastiá; Cristina Martínez-Barba; Jose Ríos
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 2.125

5.  The preterm piglet - a model in the study of oesophageal development in preterm neonates.

Authors:  S Rasch; P T Sangild; H Gregersen; M Schmidt; T Omari; C Lau
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 2.299

6.  Benefits and challenges of transitioning preterm infants to at-breast feedings.

Authors:  Kathleen M Buckley; Gloria E Charles
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 3.461

Review 7.  Technological solutions and main indices for the assessment of newborns' nutritive sucking: a review.

Authors:  Eleonora Tamilia; Fabrizio Taffoni; Domenico Formica; Luca Ricci; Emiliano Schena; Flavio Keller; Eugenio Guglielmelli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  Abnormal Nutritive Sucking as an Indicator of Neonatal Brain Injury.

Authors:  Sabrina Shandley; Gilson Capilouto; Eleonora Tamilia; David M Riley; Yvette R Johnson; Christos Papadelis
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.418

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.