Literature DB >> 33511093

Abnormal Nutritive Sucking as an Indicator of Neonatal Brain Injury.

Sabrina Shandley1, Gilson Capilouto2,3, Eleonora Tamilia4, David M Riley5,6, Yvette R Johnson5,6,7, Christos Papadelis1,4,6,8.   

Abstract

A term neonate is born with the ability to suck; this neuronal network is already formed and functional by 28 weeks gestational age and continues to evolve into adulthood. Because of the necessity of acquiring nutrition, the complexity of the neuronal network needed to suck, and neuroplasticity in infancy, the skill of sucking has the unique ability to give insight into areas of the brain that may be damaged either during or before birth. Interpretation of the behaviors during sucking shows promise in guiding therapies and how to potentially repair the damage early in life, when neuroplasticity is high. Sucking requires coordinated suck-swallow-breathe actions and is classified into two basic types, nutritive and non-nutritive. Each type of suck has particular characteristics that can be measured and used to learn about the infant's neuronal circuitry. Basic sucking and swallowing are present in embryos and further develop to incorporate breathing ex utero. Due to the rhythmic nature of the suck-swallow-breathe process, these motor functions are controlled by central pattern generators. The coordination of swallowing, breathing, and sucking is an enormously complex sensorimotor process. Because of this complexity, brain injury before birth can have an effect on these sucking patterns. Clinical assessments allow evaluators to score the oral-motor pattern, however, they remain ultimately subjective. Thus, clinicians are in need of objective measures to identify the specific area of deficit in the sucking pattern of each infant to tailor therapies to their specific needs. Therapeutic approaches involve pacifiers, cheek/chin support, tactile, oral kinesthetic, auditory, vestibular, and/or visual sensorimotor inputs. These therapies are performed to train the infant to suck appropriately using these subjective assessments along with the experience of the therapist (usually a speech therapist), but newer, more objective measures are coming along. Recent studies have correlated pathological sucking patterns with neuroimaging data to get a map of the affected brain regions to better inform therapies. The purpose of this review is to provide a broad scope synopsis of the research field of infant nutritive and non-nutritive feeding, their underlying neurophysiology, and relationship of abnormal activity with brain injury in preterm and term infants.
Copyright © 2021 Shandley, Capilouto, Tamilia, Riley, Johnson and Papadelis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain injury; neuroimaging; non-nutritive; nutritive; sucking

Year:  2021        PMID: 33511093      PMCID: PMC7835320          DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.599633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Pediatr        ISSN: 2296-2360            Impact factor:   3.418


  106 in total

1.  Changes in sucking performance from nonnutritive sucking to nutritive sucking during breast- and bottle-feeding.

Authors:  Katsumi Mizuno; Aki Ueda
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  Developing somatosensory projections bypass periventricular brain lesions.

Authors:  M Staudt; C Braun; C Gerloff; M Erb; W Grodd; I Krägeloh-Mann
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Comparison of tongue muscle characteristics of preterm and full term infants during nutritive and nonnutritive sucking.

Authors:  G J Capilouto; T Cunningham; E Frederick; E Dupont-Versteegden; N Desai; T A Butterfield
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2014-06-20

4.  Co-ordination of tongue movements and peri-oral muscle activities during nutritive sucking.

Authors:  Y Tamura; Y Horikawa; S Yoshida
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.449

5.  Responses of small preterm infants to bottle- and breast-feeding.

Authors:  P Meier; G C Anderson
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.412

6.  A comparison of the nutritive sucking performance of full term and preterm neonates at hospital discharge: A prospective study.

Authors:  Gilson J Capilouto; Tommy J Cunningham; Peter J Giannone; Deborah Grider
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 7.  Injury and repair in perinatal brain injury: Insights from non-invasive MR perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Pia Wintermark
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.300

8.  Multisensory intervention for preterm infants improves sucking organization.

Authors:  Barbara Medoff-Cooper; Kristin Rankin; Zhuoying Li; Li Liu; Rosemary White-Traut
Journal:  Adv Neonatal Care       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.968

9.  Effect of artificial rearing on the contractile properties and myosin heavy chain isoforms of developing rat tongue musculature.

Authors:  Stacy A Kinirons; Mary S Shall; J Ross McClung; Stephen J Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Motor outcome differences between two groups of children with spastic diplegia who received different intensities of early onset physiotherapy followed for 5 years.

Authors:  Toyoko Kanda; Frank S Pidcock; Katumi Hayakawa; Yuriko Yamori; Yuko Shikata
Journal:  Brain Dev       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.961

View more
  1 in total

1.  Risk Factors for High-Arched Palate and Posterior Crossbite at the Age of 5 in Children Born Very Preterm: EPIPAGE-2 Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sandra Herrera; Véronique Pierrat; Monique Kaminski; Valérie Benhammou; Laetitia Marchand-Martin; Andrei S Morgan; Elvire Le Norcy; Pierre-Yves Ancel; Alice Germa
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.569

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.