Literature DB >> 3678318

The relationship between blood prolactin levels and risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women.

D Y Wang1, B L de Stavola, R D Bulbrook, D S Allen, H G Kwa, A A Verstraeten, J W Moore, I S Fentiman, M Chaudary, J L Hayward.   

Abstract

Single specimens of blood have been taken from over 5000 normal volunteer women in each of two sequential (1967-1976, 1977-1984) population-based studied on the Island of Guernsey. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the relationship between prolactin levels and risk factors in breast cancer in 2591 and 1959 premenopausal women in whom blood prolactin had been measured. In both populations the prolactin concentrations appeared to be log-normally distributed and therefore all analyses have been done on log-transformed data. Initially the variables in the statistical model were age at menarche, ages at first and last baby, parity, ponderosity (Quetelet Index), mammographic pattern (as graded by Wolfe), family history of breast cancer, age, menstrual cycle status, time of day of blood sampling, oral contraceptive use, history of breast feeding and methodological changes in the laboratory measurement of prolactin. Of these variables age at menarche, ages at first and last child and family history of breast cancer were found not to be significant and were excluded from the final model. The main finding to emerge was that after standardizing for all the other variables, prolactin levels in the follicular phase were significantly lower than those found at midcycle or during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. A peak level of prolactin was found at day 12 of the cycle. Increasing parity was related to a steady decrease in prolactin concentration. Increasing ponderosity was associated with an increased prolactin level as was a DY compared to an N1 mammographic pattern. Women with a history of oral contraceptive use had lowered prolactin concentration. All these effects occurred evenly over the menstrual cycle and were generally found for both data sets. Thus body weight, parity and, indirectly, age at first baby might influence breast cancer risk by being associated with changes in blood prolactin concentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3678318     DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(87)90098-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-5379


  13 in total

1.  Duration of lactation and incidence of maternal hypertension: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Alison M Stuebe; Eleanor B Schwarz; Karen Grewen; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Karin B Michels; E Michael Foster; Gary Curhan; John Forman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Prolactin and human weight disturbances: A puzzling and neglected association.

Authors:  Luis G Sobrinho; Nelson D Horseman
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  The pituitary stalk effect: is it a passing phenomenon?

Authors:  Marvin Bergsneider; Leili Mirsadraei; William H Yong; Noriko Salamon; Michael Linetsky; Marilene B Wang; David L McArthur; Anthony P Heaney
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Bioactive prolactin levels and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Shelley S Tworoger; Megan S Rice; Bernard A Rosner; Yvonne B Feeney; Charles V Clevenger; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Circulating prolactin levels and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Tess V Clendenen; Alan A Arslan; Anna E Lokshin; Mengling Liu; Eva Lundin; Karen L Koenig; Franco Berrino; Goran Hallmans; Annika Idahl; Vittorio Krogh; Annekatrin Lukanova; Adele Marrangoni; Paola Muti; Brian M Nolen; Nina Ohlson; Roy E Shore; Sabina Sieri; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 6.  The effects of hyperprolactinemia on bone and fat.

Authors:  Amal Shibli-Rahhal; Janet Schlechte
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  Serum hormone levels in British and rural Chinese females.

Authors:  D Y Wang; T J Key; M C Pike; J Boreham; J Chen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  Prolactin and breast cancer etiology: an epidemiologic perspective.

Authors:  Shelley S Tworoger; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.673

9.  Weight gain with olanzapine: Drug, gender or age?

Authors:  Sanjay Jain; Manish Bhargava; Shiv Gautam
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.759

10.  Autoantibodies to aberrantly glycosylated MUC1 in early stage breast cancer are associated with a better prognosis.

Authors:  Ola Blixt; Deanna Bueti; Brian Burford; Diane Allen; Sylvain Julien; Michael Hollingsworth; Alex Gammerman; Ian Fentiman; Joyce Taylor-Papadimitriou; Joy M Burchell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.