| Literature DB >> 20703413 |
Sanjay Jain1, Manish Bhargava, Shiv Gautam.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The introduction of atypical antipsychotics was a big step forward in the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychoses. Their limitations, however, became evident over time. AIM: To study the causes of weight gain associated with the use of olanzapine-an atypical antipsychotic drug.Entities:
Keywords: Weight gain; age; body mass index; dose; gender; olanzapine
Year: 2006 PMID: 20703413 PMCID: PMC2913641 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.31617
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Psychiatry ISSN: 0019-5545 Impact factor: 1.759
Distribution of the natients according to age and gender (n=60)
| Age group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | <40 years | ≥40 years | Total patients | |
| Mies | 16 (26.6) | 14 (23.3) | 30 (50) | |
| Females | 14 (23.3) | 16 (26.3) | 30 (50) | |
| Total | 30 | 30 | 60 | |
Values in parentheses are percentages.
Distribution and comparison of weight gain according to age (n=60)
| Age group (years) | patients who gained weight ( | No weight gain ( | Total | Mean weight gain±SD (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <40 | 18 (30) | 12 (20) | 30 | 2.3±2.7 |
| ≥40 | 22 (36.6) | 8 (13.3) | 30 | 3.5±2.11 |
| Total | 40 (66.6) | 20 (33.3) | 60 |
Values in parentheses are percentages, t test (tail 2; type 3) = 2.08; p<0.05
Distribution and comparison of women according to weight gain and age (n=30)
| Age group (years) | Patients who gained weight ( | No weight gain ( | Total ( | Mean weight gain±SD (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <40 | 9(30) | 5(16.6) | 14(46.6) | 1.52±1.41 |
| ≥40 | 15 (50) | 1 (3.3) | 16 (53.3) | 2.75±1.29 |
| Total | 24(80) | 6(20) | 30(100) |
Values in parentheses are percentages, t test (tail 2; type 3) = 2.40; p<0.05
Distribution and comparison of men according to weight gain and age (n=30)
| Age group (years) | Patients who gained weight ( | No weight gain ( | Total ( | Mean weight gain±SD (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <40 | 9 (30) | 7 (23.3) | 16 (53.3) | 0.87±0.95 |
| ≥40 | 7 (23.3) | 7 (23.3) | 14 (46.6) | 0.71±0.82 |
| Total | 16 (53.3) | 14 (46.6) | 30 (100) |
Values in parentheses are percentages, t test (tail 2; type 3) = 0.44; p<0.1
Comparison of weight gain in patients accoiding to gender (n=60)
| Gender | Patients who gained weight ( | No weight gain ( | Total ( | Mean weight gain±SD (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miles | 16 (26.6) | 14 (23.3) | 30 (50) | 0.77±0.91 |
| Females | 24 (40) | 6(10) | 30 (50) | 2.13±1.2 |
| Total | 40 (66.6) | 20 (33.3) | 60(100) |
Values in parentheses are percentages, t test (tail 2; type 3) = 2.72; p<0.01
Distribution of weight gain accoiding to the dosage (n=60)
| Dosage (mg/day) | No weight gain ( | Weight gained ( | Total ( | Mean weight gain±SD (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5±2.5 | 10 (16.6) | 16 (26.6) | 26 (43.3) | 1.47±1.6 |
| 10±2.5 | 5 (8.3) | 17 (28.3) | 22 (36.6) | 1.4±1.1 |
| 15±2.5 | 5 (8.3) | 7(11.6) | 12 (20) | 1.5±1.2 |
| Total | 20 (33.2) | 40 (66.32) | 60 (100) |
Values in parentheses are percentages
Comparison of weight gain in patients accoiding to the body mass index (BMI) (n=60)
| Gender | Patients who gained weight (kg) ( | Mean BMI (pretreatment) | Mean BMI (pretreatment) | Mean BMI (gain) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mies | 16 (26.6%) | 27.12 | 27.37 | 0.25 | |
| Females | 24 (40%) | 25.39 | 26.28 | 0.89 |
Possible mechanisms behind weight gain with olanzapine
Improved functioning-Jess self-neglect, improved eating habits Increase in appetite-eaibohydrate craving, sedation and decreased motor activity Altered adipose tissue-Hetabolism, fat composition (brown/white/adipose tissue) and distribution Neurotransnitter effects due to serotonineigic, histamineigic, Increase in the leptin level Hyperinsulinaemia, hyperlipidaemia, insulin resistance and hyperleptinaemia may be associated with weight gain Increase in prolactin level |