PURPOSE: Indirect evidence from experimental and epidemiological studies suggests that prolactin may be involved in ovarian cancer development. However, the relationship between circulating prolactin levels and risk of ovarian cancer is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study of 230 cases and 432 individually matched controls within three prospective cohorts to evaluate whether pre-diagnostic circulating prolactin is associated with subsequent risk of ovarian cancer. We also assessed whether lifestyle and reproductive factors are associated with circulating prolactin among controls. RESULTS: Prolactin levels were significantly lower among post- versus pre-menopausal women, parous versus nulliparous women, and past versus never users of oral contraceptives in our cross-sectional analysis of controls. In our nested case-control study, we observed a non-significant positive association between circulating prolactin and ovarian cancer risk (OR(Q4vsQ1) 1.56, 95 % CI 0.94, 2.63, p trend 0.15). Our findings were similar in multivariate-adjusted models and in the subgroup of women who donated blood ≥5 years prior to diagnosis. We observed a significant positive association between prolactin and risk for the subgroup of women with BMI ≥25 kg/m(2) (OR(Q4vsQ1) 3.10, 95 % CI 1.39, 6.90), but not for women with BMI <25 kg/m(2) (OR(Q4vsQ1) 0.81, 95 % CI 0.40, 1.64). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that prolactin may be associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer, particularly in overweight/obese women. Factors associated with reduced risk of ovarian cancer, such as parity and use of oral contraceptives, were associated with lower prolactin levels, which suggests that modulation of prolactin may be a mechanism underlying their association with risk.
PURPOSE: Indirect evidence from experimental and epidemiological studies suggests that prolactin may be involved in ovarian cancer development. However, the relationship between circulating prolactin levels and risk of ovarian cancer is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study of 230 cases and 432 individually matched controls within three prospective cohorts to evaluate whether pre-diagnostic circulating prolactin is associated with subsequent risk of ovarian cancer. We also assessed whether lifestyle and reproductive factors are associated with circulating prolactin among controls. RESULTS:Prolactin levels were significantly lower among post- versus pre-menopausal women, parous versus nulliparous women, and past versus never users of oral contraceptives in our cross-sectional analysis of controls. In our nested case-control study, we observed a non-significant positive association between circulating prolactin and ovarian cancer risk (OR(Q4vsQ1) 1.56, 95 % CI 0.94, 2.63, p trend 0.15). Our findings were similar in multivariate-adjusted models and in the subgroup of women who donated blood ≥5 years prior to diagnosis. We observed a significant positive association between prolactin and risk for the subgroup of women with BMI ≥25 kg/m(2) (OR(Q4vsQ1) 3.10, 95 % CI 1.39, 6.90), but not for women with BMI <25 kg/m(2) (OR(Q4vsQ1) 0.81, 95 % CI 0.40, 1.64). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that prolactin may be associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer, particularly in overweight/obesewomen. Factors associated with reduced risk of ovarian cancer, such as parity and use of oral contraceptives, were associated with lower prolactin levels, which suggests that modulation of prolactin may be a mechanism underlying their association with risk.
Authors: J Fishman; D Fukushima; J O'Connor; R S Rosenfeld; H T Lynch; J F Lynch; H Guirgis; K Maloney Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1978-11 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Shelley S Tworoger; Bess Sorensen; Jessica Chubak; Melinda Irwin; Frank Z Stanczyk; Cornelia M Ulrich; John Potter; Anne McTiernan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Katherine W Reeves; Olivia I Okereke; Jing Qian; Shelley S Tworoger; Megan S Rice; Susan E Hankinson Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Shelley S Tworoger; Megan S Rice; Bernard A Rosner; Yvonne B Feeney; Charles V Clevenger; Susan E Hankinson Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Naveen K Neradugomma; Dharmalingam Subramaniam; Ossama W Tawfik; Vincent Goffin; T Rajendra Kumar; Roy A Jensen; Shrikant Anant Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Renée T Fortner; Elizabeth M Poole; Nicolas A Wentzensen; Britton Trabert; Emily White; Alan A Arslan; Alpa V Patel; V Wendy Setiawan; Kala Visvanathan; Elisabete Weiderpass; Hans-Olov Adami; Amanda Black; Leslie Bernstein; Louise A Brinton; Julie Buring; Tess V Clendenen; Agnès Fournier; Gary Fraser; Susan M Gapstur; Mia M Gaudet; Graham G Giles; Inger T Gram; Patricia Hartge; Judith Hoffman-Bolton; Annika Idahl; Rudolf Kaaks; Victoria A Kirsh; Synnove Knutsen; Woon-Puay Koh; James V Lacey; I-Min Lee; Eva Lundin; Melissa A Merritt; Roger L Milne; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Ulrike Peters; Jenny N Poynter; Sabina Rinaldi; Kim Robien; Thomas Rohan; Maria-José Sánchez; Catherine Schairer; Leo J Schouten; Anne Tjonneland; Mary K Townsend; Ruth C Travis; Antonia Trichopoulou; Piet A van den Brandt; Paolo Vineis; Lynne Wilkens; Alicja Wolk; Hannah P Yang; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Shelley S Tworoger Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Cassandra A Hathaway; Megan S Rice; Mary K Townsend; Susan E Hankinson; Alan A Arslan; Julie E Buring; Göran Hallmans; Annika Idahl; Laura D Kubzansky; I-Min Lee; Eva A Lundin; Patrick M Sluss; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Shelley S Tworoger Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Adrián Ramírez de Arellano; Edgar I Lopez-Pulido; Priscila A Martínez-Neri; Ciro Estrada Chávez; Renee González Lucano; Mary Fafutis-Morris; A Aguilar-Lemarroy; José F Muñoz-Valle; Ana Laura Pereira-Suárez Journal: Cancer Cell Int Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 5.722
Authors: Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich; Sigrid Weingartshofer; Christine Rappaport-Fürhauser; Robert Zeillinger; Dietmar Pils; Daniela Muhr; Elena I Braicu; Marie-Therese Kastner; Yen Y Tan; Lorenz Semmler; Jalid Sehouli; Christian F Singer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 3.240