Literature DB >> 25730430

Reproducibility of intra-abdominal pressure measured during physical activities via a wireless vaginal transducer.

Marlene J Egger1, Nadia M Hamad, Robert W Hitchcock, Tanner J Coleman, Janet M Shaw, Yvonne Hsu, Ingrid E Nygaard.   

Abstract

AIMS: In the urodynamics laboratory setting, a wireless pressure transducer, developed to facilitate research exploring intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and pelvic floor disorders, was highly accurate. We aimed to study reproducibility of IAP measured using this transducer in women during activities performed in an exercise science laboratory.
METHODS: Fifty-seven women (mean ± SD, age 30.4 ±9.3 years; body mass index, 22.4 ± 2.68 kg/m) completed 2 standardized activity sessions using the same transducer at least 3 days apart. Pressure data for 31 activities were transmitted wirelessly to a base station and analyzed for mean net maximal IAP, area under the curve, and first moment of the area. Activities included typical exercises, lifting 13.6 to 18.2 kg, and simulated household tasks. Analysis for test-retest reliability included Bland-Altman plots with absolute limits of agreement, Wilcoxon signed rank tests to assess significant differences between sessions, intraclass correlations, and κ statistics to assess intersession agreement in highest versus other quintiles of maximal IAP.
RESULTS: Few activities exhibited significant differences between sessions in maximal IAP, or in area under the curve and first moment of the area values. For 13 activities, the agreement between repeat measures of maximal IAP was better than ±10 cm H20; for 20 activities, better than ±15 cm H20. The absolute limits of agreement increased with mean IAP. The highest quintile of IAP demonstrated fair/substantial agreement between sessions in 25 of 30 activities.
CONCLUSIONS: Reproducibility of IAP depends on the activity undertaken. Interventions geared toward lowering IAP should account for this, maximize efforts to improve IAP reproducibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25730430      PMCID: PMC4409923          DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  23 in total

1.  Intra-abdominal pressure changes during natural movements in man.

Authors:  S Grillner; J Nilsson; A Thorstensson
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1978-07

2.  More complicated than it looks: the vagaries of calculating intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  Nadia M Hamad; Janet M Shaw; Ingrid E Nygaard; Tanner J Coleman; Yvonne Hsu; Marlene Egger; Robert W Hitchcock
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  The vagina as an alternative to the rectum in measuring abdominal pressure during urodynamic investigations.

Authors:  E D James; P G Niblett; J A MacNaughton; C Shaldon
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1987-09

4.  Vaginal pressure as an index of intra-abdominal pressure during urodynamic evaluation.

Authors:  H Al-Taher; J R Sutherst; D H Richmond; M C Brown
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1987-06

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Validity of rectal pressure measurements as indication of intra-abdominal pressure changes during urodynamic evaluation.

Authors:  T A McCarthy
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Intra-abdominal pressures during activity in women using an intra-vaginal pressure transducer.

Authors:  Janet M Shaw; Nadia M Hamad; Tanner J Coleman; Marlene J Egger; Yvonne Hsu; Robert Hitchcock; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 9.  Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): time for a critical re-appraisal.

Authors:  Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Design and development of a novel intra-vaginal pressure sensor.

Authors:  Jennifer Kruger; Lynsey Hayward; Poul Nielsen; Denis Loiselle; Robert Kirton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.894

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of walking speeds and carrying techniques on intra-abdominal pressure in women.

Authors:  Tanner J Coleman; Nadia M Hamad; Janet M Shaw; Marlene J Egger; Yvonne Hsu; Robert Hitchcock; Huifeng Jin; Chan K Choi; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Temporal trends in trunk flexor endurance and intra-abdominal pressure in postpartum women.

Authors:  Russell Hendrycks; Meng Yang; Robert Hitchcock; Monika Leitner; Stefan Niederauer; Ingrid E Nygaard; Xiaoming Sheng; Janet M Shaw
Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Relationship of heart rate, perceived exertion, and intra-abdominal pressure in women.

Authors:  Ali E Wolpern; Johanna D de Gennaro; Timothy A Brusseau; Wonwoo Byun; Marlene J Egger; Robert W Hitchcock; Ingrid E Nygaard; Xiaoming Sheng; Janet M Shaw
Journal:  J Clin Exerc Physiol       Date:  2020-10-16

4.  Intra-abdominal Pressure and Pelvic Floor Health: Should We Be Thinking About This Relationship Differently?

Authors:  Martin Dietze-Hermosa; Robert Hitchcock; Ingrid E Nygaard; Janet M Shaw
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.091

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.