Literature DB >> 367574

Low dose chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CAMF) versus sequential cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) and adriamycin.

R H Creech, R B Catalano, D T Harris, P F Engstrom, P J Grotzinger.   

Abstract

Seventy-eight advanced breast cancer patients with hormone-resistant disease or visceral metastases were randomized to receive either of two low dose regimens consisting of cyclophosphamide (C), methotrexate (M), 5-fluorouracil (F), and Adriamycin (A) as their initial chemotherapy. One group was treated with CAMF, and the other with CMF until progression, followed by A (CMF leads to A). C was given at 50 mg/m2, po, days 1-14; M at 20 mg/m2, F at 300 mg/m2, and A at 20 mg/m2, iv, days 1 and 8 of each 28-day cycle. The response rates for CAMF vs. CMF did not differ significantly (complete and partial responses-62% vs. 49%; stabilizations-23% vs. 31%). Responses by site of metasis, median times to progression and median survivals were similar for both groups. Poor and good risk partial responders had similar survivals. Twelve percent of CMF patients treated with Adriamycin at the time of progression had partial responses with an associated improved survival. Since CMF is as effective as CAMF, but has less toxicity, low dose therapy with CMF is more acceptable than CAMF as an initial chemotherapy regimen for metastatic breast cancer. Adriamycin may be reserved for subsequent regression induction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 367574     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197901)43:1<51::aid-cncr2820430107>3.0.co;2-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  8 in total

1.  A phase II study of intensive-dose epirubicin/verapamil as induction therapy followed by intensive-dose ifosfamide for advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  T Langenbuch; K Mross; W Jonat; D K Hossfeld
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 2.  Systemic therapy in breast cancer: efficacy and cost utility.

Authors:  J F Corry; P E Lønning
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Site-dependent response to chemotherapy for carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  J M Whitehouse
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  The effects of multiple combination chemotherapy with vincristine, cyclophosphamide (Endoxan), methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and prednisolone (VEMFAH) for advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  T Kojima; A Hoshino; K Ohara; O Kamiya; K Nagata; Y Ito; T Kinoshita; I Sugiura; M Yamada; H Sato
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 5.  Postmenopausal breast cancer. Drug therapy in the 1990s.

Authors:  C I Falkson; G Falkson; H C Falkson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Intensive short-term chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  H E Wander; G A Nagel; H Luig; D Emrich
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1987-04-01

Review 7.  Addition of drug/s to a chemotherapy regimen for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Daria J Butters; Davina Ghersi; Nicholas Wilcken; Steven J Kirk; Peter T Mallon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-11-10

Review 8.  Antitumour antibiotic containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  S Lord; D Ghersi; M Gattellari; S Wortley; N Wilcken; J Simes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.