Literature DB >> 8477145

Postmenopausal breast cancer. Drug therapy in the 1990s.

C I Falkson1, G Falkson, H C Falkson.   

Abstract

In summarising current drug treatment strategies for postmenopausal women with breast cancer, it is essential to emphasise that we are dealing with a group of diseases that are treatable, and that appropriate treatment decisions will give longer disease-free intervals for patients with early breast cancer, and better control with better survival for patients with advanced (i.e. locally advanced and/or metastatic) disease. Women greater than 65 years of age have a predictably better response to hormone treatment versus women less than 65 years of age. Hormone treatment may, therefore, be considered as primary treatment or as adjuvant treatment after limited surgery. Hormone treatment is also the treatment of first choice for elderly patients with advanced disease. For middle-aged women (45 to 65 years of age), various patient factors are important in predicting the value of treatment. Estrogen receptor (ER) status is prognostic of survival irrespective of treatment. Patients with ER-positive disease have a better prognosis than those with ER-negative disease, both in the adjuvant setting and in the face of metastatic disease. This is because ER-positive tumours tend to grow slower. The availability of the serotonin type 3 (5-hydroxytryptamine;5-HT3) antagonists, which effectively control nausea and vomiting in most patients, make chemotherapy combinations more acceptable, and combination chemotherapy can more readily be considered as first treatment option both as adjuvant treatment and for treatment of advanced disease. For patients with organ metastases there is no doubt that combined chemotherapy treatment is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8477145     DOI: 10.2165/00002512-199303020-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  103 in total

1.  A phase I/II investigation of trioxifene mesylate in advanced breast cancer. Clinical and endocrinologic effects.

Authors:  R S Witte; B Pruitt; D C Tormey; S Moss; D P Rose; G Falkson; P P Carbone; G Ramirez; H Falkson; F J Pretorius
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Distant recurrence in breast cancer. Survival expectations and first choice of chemotherapy regimen.

Authors:  H Brincker
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  Age as a prognostic factor in breast cancer.

Authors:  H Høst; E Lund
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Megestrol acetate and aminoglutethimide/hydrocortisone in sequence or in combination as second-line endocrine therapy of estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group phase III trial.

Authors:  C A Russell; S J Green; J O'Sullivan; H E Hynes; G T Budd; J E Congdon; S Martino; C K Osborne
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Randomized clinical trial of megestrol acetate versus tamoxifen in paramenopausal or castrated women with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  J N Ingle; D L Ahmann; S J Green; J H Edmonson; E T Creagan; R G Hahn; J Rubin
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 2.339

6.  A randomized multicenter trial comparing mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil in the therapy of metastatic breast carcinoma.

Authors:  J M Bennett; H B Muss; J H Doroshow; S Wolff; E T Krementz; K Cartwright; G Dukart; A Reisman; I Schoch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Comparison of CAF versus CMFP in metastatic breast cancer: analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  F J Cummings; R Gelman; J Horton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Adriamycin versus methotrexate in five-drug combination chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  H B Muss; D R White; F Richards; M R Cooper; J J Stuart; D V Jackson; L Rhyne; C L Spurr
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  A comparison of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, vincristine, and prednisone (CMFVP) in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  R V Smalley; J Lefante; A Bartolucci; J Carpenter; C Vogel; S Krauss
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  A pilot study of mitomycin-C and tamoxifen (MT) versus dibromodulcitol, adriamycin, and tamoxifen (DAT).

Authors:  Y C Chang; G Falkson; D C Tormey; J Crowley
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.339

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Vinorelbine. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical use in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  K L Goa; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.