Literature DB >> 15495049

Antitumour antibiotic containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer.

S Lord, D Ghersi, M Gattellari, S Wortley, N Wilcken, J Simes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antitumour antibiotics are used in the management of metastatic breast cancer. Some of these agents have demonstrated higher tumour response rates than non-antitumour antibiotic regimens, however a survival benefit has not been established in this setting.
OBJECTIVES: To identify and review the randomised evidence comparing anti-tumour antibiotic containing chemotherapy regimens with regimens not containing an anti-tumour antibiotic in the management of women with metastatic breast cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: The specialised register maintained by the Editorial Base of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group was searched on 2nd May, 2003 using the codes for "advanced breast cancer" and "chemotherapy". Details of the search strategy and coding applied by the Group to create the register are described in the Group's module on The Cochrane Library. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing anti-tumour antibiotic containing regimens with regimens not containing anti-tumour antibiotics in women with metastatic breast cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected from published trials. Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality, and data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Hazard ratios (HRs) were derived from time-to-event outcomes where possible, and a fixed effect model was used for meta-analysis. Response rates were analysed as dichotomous variables. Quality of life and toxicity data were extracted where present. A primary analysis was conducted for all trials and by class of antitumour antibiotic. MAIN
RESULTS: Thirty-three trials reporting on 45 treatment comparisons were identified. All trials published results for tumour response and 26 trials published time-to-event data for overall survival. The observed 4084 deaths in 5284 randomised women did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in survival between regimens that contained antitumour antibiotics and those that did not (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.03, P = 0.35) and no significant heterogeneity. Antitumour antibiotic regimens were favourably associated with time-to-progression (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.91) and tumour response rates (odds ratio (OR) 1.34, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.48) although statistically significant heterogeneity was observed for these outcomes. These associations were consistent when the analysis was restricted to the 29 trials that reported on anthracyclines. Patients receiving anthracycline-containing regimens were also more likely to experience toxic events compared to patients receiving non-antitumour antibiotic regimens. No statistically significant difference was observed in any outcome between mitoxantrone-containing and non-antitumour antibiotic-containing regimens. REVIEWERS'
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to regimens without antitumour antibiotics, regimens that contained these agents showed a statistically significant advantage for tumour response and time to progression in women with metastatic breast cancer but were not associated with an improvement in overall survival. The favourable effect on tumour response and time to progression observed in anthracycline-containing regimens was also associated with greater toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15495049      PMCID: PMC6999796          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003367.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  69 in total

1.  Mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin (NFL) in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: randomized comparison to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) and attempts to improve efficacy by adding paclitaxel.

Authors:  J D Hainsworth
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.520

2.  Combination chemotherapy with cmf (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-Fluorouracil) versus cnf (mitoxantrone, 5-Fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide) in advanced breast-cancer - a multicenter randomized study.

Authors:  V Lorusso; P Vici; A Bianco; M Lopez; S Deplacido; A Piano; G Palomba; C Carlomagno; M Daprile; V Fosser; M Brandi; M Delena
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.650

3.  Combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: comparison of multiple drug therapy with 5-fluorouracil, cytoxan and prednisone with adriamycin or adrenalectomy.

Authors:  T Nemoto; D Rosner; R Diaz; T Dao; R Sponzo; T Cunningham; J Horton; R Simon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Response and survival in advanced breast cancer after two non-cross-resistant combinations.

Authors:  C Brambilla; M De Lena; A Rossi; P Valagussa; G Bonadonna
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-04-03

5.  Adriamycin plus vincristine compared to and combined with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil for advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  M De Lena; C Brambilla; A Morabito; G Bonadonna
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  A randomized comparative trial of adriamycin versus methotrexate in combination drug therapy.

Authors:  J M Bull; D C Tormey; S H Li; P P Carbone; G Falkson; J Blom; E Perlin; R Simon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Prognostic factors in the initial response to therapy by patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  S L George; B Hoogstraten
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Low dose chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CAMF) versus sequential cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) and adriamycin.

Authors:  R H Creech; R B Catalano; D T Harris; P F Engstrom; P J Grotzinger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Randomized trial of 3 different regimens of combination chemotherapy in patients receiving simultaneously a hormonal treatment for advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  F Cavalli; A Pedrazzini; G Martz; W F Jungi; K W Brunner; A Goldhirsch; B Mermillod; P Alberto
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-11

10.  Cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and platinum (CAP) combination chemotherapy, a new effective approach in the treatment of disseminated breast cancer. Preliminary report.

Authors:  K Kolarić; D Vukas; A Roth; V Potrebica; J Cervek; O Cerar
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1985-04-30
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer - An Anachronism in the Era of Personalised and Targeted Oncological Therapy?

Authors:  A Schneeweiss; E Ruckhäberle; J Huober
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 2.  Addition of drug/s to a chemotherapy regimen for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Daria J Butters; Davina Ghersi; Nicholas Wilcken; Steven J Kirk; Peter T Mallon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-11-10

3.  A multicenter prospective phase II randomized trial of epirubicin/vinorelbine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/vinorelbine as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. A GOIM study.

Authors:  Patrizia Vici; Giuseppe Colucci; Francesco Giotta; Domenico Sergi; Gianfranco Filippelli; Pasquale Perri; Claudio Botti; Enrico Vizza; Armando Carpino; Laura Pizzuti; Agnese Latorre; Diana Giannarelli; Massimo Lopez; Luigi Di Lauro
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-12

Review 4.  The prevention, detection and management of cancer treatment-induced cardiotoxicity: a meta-review.

Authors:  Aaron Conway; Alexandra L McCarthy; Petra Lawrence; Robyn A Clark
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.