Literature DB >> 3664914

A comparison of nalbuphine and meperidine in treatment of postoperative pain.

E Hew1, K Foster, R Gordon, E Hew-Sang.   

Abstract

The analgesic efficacy and side effect profile of nalbuphine 20 mg IV and of nalbuphine 40 mg IV were compared to those of meperidine 75 mg IM in the immediate postoperative period. Pain intensity, pain relief, additional analgesic requirements and the overall acceptability of the treatment were recorded for 150 patients. No significant differences were found between the groups for any of the efficacy variables. Peak analgesic effects occurred at 15 minutes in both nalbuphine groups and at 30 minutes in the meperidine group. The mean time to additional analgesic medication was approximately 207 minutes in each group. The incidence of nausea and vomiting with meperidine was 22 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval 10 to 34 per cent) and with nalbuphine 20 mg the incidence was two per cent (95%CI -2 to 6 per cent). This difference was significant (p less than 0.01). The difference between nalbuphine 40 mg (10 per cent, 95%CI 1 to 19 per cent) and meperidine, was not considered statistically significant (p = 0.17). The analgesic efficacy of nalbuphine 20 mg was indistinguishable from that of nalbuphine 40 mg and from that of meperidine 75 mg. The significantly lower incidence of nausea and vomiting with nalbuphine is a major advantage for a recovery room analgesic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3664914     DOI: 10.1007/BF03014350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  10 in total

1.  COMPARATIVE HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF NALBUPHINE AND MORPHINE IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE.

Authors:  Alexander Romagnoli; Arthur S. Keats
Journal:  Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1978-03

2.  A comparison of the analgesic effect of intramuscular nalbuphine and morphine in patients with postoperative pain.

Authors:  W T Beaver; G A Feise
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Cardiovascular effects of nalbuphine in patients with coronary or valvular heart disease.

Authors:  C L Lake; E N Duckworth; C A DiFazio; C G Durbin; M R Magruder
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Ceiling effect for respiratory depression by nalbuphine.

Authors:  A Romagnoli; A S Keats
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Anesthetic potency of nalbuphine and interaction with morphine in rats.

Authors:  C A DiFazio; J C Moscicki; M R Magruder
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  The enflurane sparing effect of morphine, butorphanol, and nalbuphine.

Authors:  M R Murphy; C C Hug
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Analgesic and respiratory depressant activity of nalbuphine: a comparison with morphine.

Authors:  T J Gal; C A DiFazio; J Moscicki
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Comparison of nalbuphine and pethidine for the relief of pain after caesarean section.

Authors:  A Thorniley; D G Moyes; R F Pike; E Acafrao
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1986-05-24

9.  Hemodynamic effects of morphine and nalbuphine in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G Lee; R I Low; E A Amsterdam; A N DeMaria; P W Huber; D T Mason
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Nalbuphine versus meperidine for post-operative analgesia: a double-blind comparison using the patient controlled analgesic technique.

Authors:  J S Sprigge; P E Otton
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1983-09
  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Opioid agonist-antagonist drugs in acute and chronic pain states.

Authors:  P J Hoskin; G W Hanks
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 9.546

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.