Literature DB >> 1711441

Opioid agonist-antagonist drugs in acute and chronic pain states.

P J Hoskin1, G W Hanks.   

Abstract

The agonist-antagonist opioid analgesics are a heterogeneous group of drugs with moderate to strong analgesic activity comparable to that of the pure agonist opioids such as codeine and morphine but with a limited effective dose range. The group includes drugs which act as an agonist or partial agonist at one receptor and an antagonist at another (pentazocine, butorphanol, nalbuphine, dezocine) and drugs acting as a partial agonist at a single receptor (buprenorphine). These drugs can be classified as nalorphine-like or morphine-like. Meptazinol does not fit into either classification and occupies a separate category. Pentazocine, butorphanol and nalbuphine are weak mu-antagonists and kappa-partial-agonists. All three drugs are strong analgesics when given by injection: pentazocine is one-sixth to one-third as potent as morphine, nalbuphine is slightly less potent than morphine, and butorphanol is 3.5 to 7 times as potent. The duration of analgesia is similar to that of morphine (3 to 4 hours). Oral pentazocine is closer in analgesic efficacy to aspirin and paracetamol (acetaminophen) than the weak opioid analgesics such as codeine. Neither nalbuphine nor butorphanol is available as an oral formulation. At usual therapeutic doses nalbuphine and butorphanol have respiratory depressant effects equivalent to that of morphine (though the duration of such effects with butorphanol may be longer). Unlike morphine there appears to be a ceiling to both the respiratory depression and the analgesic action. All of these 3 drugs have a lower abuse potential than the pure agonist opioid analgesics such as morphine. However, all have been subject to abuse and misuse, and pentazocine (but not the others) is subject to Controlled Drug restrictions. Buprenorphine is a potent partial agonist at the mu-receptor, and by intramuscular injection is 30 times as potent as morphine. A ceiling to the analgesic effect of buprenorphine has been demonstrated in animals and it is also claimed in humans. However, there are no reliable data available to define the maximal dose of buprenorphine in humans. A practical ceiling exists for sublingual use in that the only available formulation is a 2 micrograms tablet and few patients will accept more than 3 or 4 of these in a single dose. The duration of analgesia is longer than that of morphine, at 6 to 9 hours. There have been suggestions that buprenorphine causes less respiratory depression than morphine, but viewed overall it appears that in equianalgesic doses the 2 drugs have similar respiratory depressant effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1711441     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199141030-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  103 in total

1.  A comparison of the analgesic effects of pentazocine and morphine in patients with cancer.

Authors:  W T Beaver; S L Wallenstein; R W Houde; A Rogers
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1966 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 2.  Oral meptazinol--United Kingdom experience.

Authors:  J A Henry
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Butorphanol and pentazocine in patients with severe postoperative pain.

Authors:  A B Dobkin; S Eamkaow; F S Caruso
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  [Sublingual buprenorphine in the treatment of pain caused by cancer. Transition to buprenorphine from other opiates].

Authors:  B Enig
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1983-10-17

5.  Sublingual buprenorphine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Drug Ther Bull       Date:  1982-09-17

6.  Constant i.v. infusions of nalbuphine or buprenorphine for pain after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  G C Pugh; G B Drummond; R A Elton; C C Macintyre
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Nalbuphine versus diamorphine early in the course of suspected myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H A Jamidar; S W Crooks; A A Adgey
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Experience with nalbuphine, a new opioid analgesic, in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R A Greenbaum; G Kaye; P D Mason
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  [Controlled study of the analgesic effect and tolerability of buprenorphine in cancer patients].

Authors:  D Dini; T Fassio; A Gottlieb; M Gini
Journal:  Minerva Med       Date:  1986-01-28       Impact factor: 4.806

10.  A cross-over comparison of the effect of morphine, pethidine, pentazocine, and phenazocine on biliary pressure.

Authors:  G Economou; J N Ward-McQuaid
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  38 in total

1.  The effects of repeated opioid administration on locomotor activity: I. Opposing actions of mu and kappa receptors.

Authors:  Mark A Smith; Jennifer L Greene-Naples; Megan A Lyle; Jordan C Iordanou; Jennifer N Felder
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics of opioids in liver disease.

Authors:  I Tegeder; J Lötsch; G Geisslinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of opioid analgesics in infants and children.

Authors:  K T Olkkola; K Hamunen; E L Maunuksela
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Comparison of the antinociceptive and antirewarding profiles of novel bifunctional nociceptin receptor/mu-opioid receptor ligands: implications for therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Lawrence Toll; Taline V Khroyan; Willma E Polgar; Faming Jiang; Cris Olsen; Nurulain T Zaveri
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  Methylnaltrexone potentiates the anti-angiogenic effects of mTOR inhibitors.

Authors:  Patrick A Singleton; Nurbek Mambetsariev; Frances E Lennon; Biji Mathew; Jessica H Siegler; Liliana Moreno-Vinasco; Ravi Salgia; Jonathan Moss; Joe Gn Garcia
Journal:  J Angiogenes Res       Date:  2010-02-19

6.  N-Cyano-7α-methoxy-carbonyl-6,14-endo-ethenotetra-hydro-northebaine.

Authors:  Mustafa Odabaşoğlu; Serkan Yavuz; Ozgür Pamir; Orhan Büyükgüngör; Yılmaz Yıldırır
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-08-22

7.  1-Methyl-3-(3-oxocyclo-hex-1-en-yl)azepan-2-one.

Authors:  Wei-Jia Liu; Hua-Jie Yuan; Lei Chen; Li Hai; Yong Wu
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-09-13

Review 8.  Electroencephalography and analgesics.

Authors:  Lasse Paludan Malver; Anne Brokjaer; Camilla Staahl; Carina Graversen; Trine Andresen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Effects of the novel, selective and low-efficacy mu opioid receptor ligand NAQ on intracranial self-stimulation in rats.

Authors:  Ahmad A Altarifi; Yunyun Yuan; Yan Zhang; Dana E Selley; S Stevens Negus
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Association between KCNJ6 (GIRK2) gene polymorphisms and postoperative analgesic requirements after major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Daisuke Nishizawa; Makoto Nagashima; Ryoji Katoh; Yasuo Satoh; Megumi Tagami; Shinya Kasai; Yasukazu Ogai; Wenhua Han; Junko Hasegawa; Naohito Shimoyama; Ichiro Sora; Masakazu Hayashida; Kazutaka Ikeda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.