Literature DB >> 7149306

The enflurane sparing effect of morphine, butorphanol, and nalbuphine.

M R Murphy, C C Hug.   

Abstract

The potencies of morphine and of the narcotic analgesic agonist-antagonists butorphanol and nalbuphine in terms of their ability to decrease enflurane MAC were studied. Following the determination of control MAC for enflurane in each dog, an intravenous bolus dose of either butorphanol tartrate, nalbuphine hydrochloride, morphine, or placebo was administered and enflurane MAC was redetermined. A higher dose of the same drug was then administered and enflurane MAC was redetermined up to a total of four doses in each animal. The successive doses for morphine and nalbuphine were 0.5, 1.5, 5.0, and 20.0 mg/kg; for butorphanol, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, and 4.0 mg/kg; lactated Ringer's solution was used as a placebo. Both butorphanol and nalbuphine produced significant reductions of enflurane MAC (11 and 8%, respectively) at their lowest doses. No further reductions were produced by three- to forty-fold larger doses of either agonist-antagonist. Morphine produced a 17% reduction of enflurane MAC at the lowest dose with progressive decreases of enflurane MAC up to 63% at a dose of 5 mg/kg morphine. A fourfold increase in the morphine dose did not further decrease MAC. No change in enflurane MAC occurred in the animals given placebo. It was concluded that there is a "ceiling" to the potency of butorphanol and nalbuphine as anesthetic supplements. There is also a limit to the anesthetic sparing effect of morphine, but it is considerably greater than that of the agonist-antagonist narcotic analgesics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7149306     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-198212000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  12 in total

1.  Epidural administered buprenorphine in the perioperative period.

Authors:  Y Miwa; E Yonemura; K Fukushima
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 2.  Agonist-antagonist opioids: theory and clinical practice.

Authors:  C Rosow
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  The pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous nalbuphine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A R Aitkenhead; E S Lin; K J Achola
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Dezocine. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  J J O'Brien; P Benfield
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Gender rather than choice of intermediate duration opioids affects emergence after craniotomy for large intracranial tumors.

Authors:  Anupa Deogaonkar; Mimi Khin; Samuel Samuel; Zeyd Y Ebrahim; Edward J Mascha; Armin Schubert
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2011

6.  Patient-controlled analgesia with nalbuphine, a new narcotic agonist-antagonist, for the treatment of postoperative pain.

Authors:  K A Lehmann; B Tenbuhs
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Epidural morphine reduces halothane MAC in humans.

Authors:  I M Schwieger; C E Klopfenstein; A Forster
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  A comparison of nalbuphine and meperidine in treatment of postoperative pain.

Authors:  E Hew; K Foster; R Gordon; E Hew-Sang
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 9.  Nalbuphine. A preliminary review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  J K Errick; R C Heel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Nalbuphine versus meperidine for post-operative analgesia: a double-blind comparison using the patient controlled analgesic technique.

Authors:  J S Sprigge; P E Otton
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1983-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.