| Literature DB >> 24992269 |
Yu Jin1, Begoña Díaz1, Marc Colomer1, Núria Sebastián-Gallés1.
Abstract
Individual differences in second language (L2) phoneme perception (within the normal population) have been related to speech perception abilities, also observed in the native language, in studies assessing the electrophysiological response mismatch negativity (MMN). Here, we investigate the brain oscillatory dynamics in the theta band, the spectral correlate of the MMN, that underpin success in phoneme learning. Using previous data obtained in an MMN paradigm, the dynamics of cortical oscillations while perceiving native and unknown phonemes and nonlinguistic stimuli were studied in two groups of participants classified as good and poor perceivers (GPs and PPs), according to their L2 phoneme discrimination abilities. The results showed that for GPs, as compared to PPs, processing of a native phoneme change produced a significant increase in theta power. Stimulus time-locked analysis event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) showed differences for the theta band within the MMN time window (between 70 and 240 ms) for the native deviant phoneme. No other significant difference between the two groups was observed for the other phoneme or nonlinguistic stimuli. The dynamic patterns in the theta-band may reflect early automatic change detection for familiar speech sounds in the brain. The behavioral differences between the two groups may reflect individual variations in activating brain circuits at a perceptual level.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24992269 PMCID: PMC4081572 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Epoch numbers in the different conditions, for the GPs and PPs groups.
| PPs | GPs | t(df), p value | |
| Native phoneme standards | 156.86±15.84 | 126±4.75 | t(28) = 1.97, p = 0.06 |
| Native phoneme deviants | 85.29±8.15 | 72.94±2.88 | t(28) = 1.50, p = 0.15 |
| Unknown phoneme standards | 156.71±13.98 | 130.94±3.30 | t(28) = 1.91, p = 0.07 |
| Unknown phoneme deviants | 89.14±7.63 | 76.13±1.91 | t(28) = 1.76, p = 0.09 |
| Frequency standards | 727.57±20.34 | 731.93±52.26 | t(27)<1, p = 0.77 |
| Frequency deviants | 98.64±1.82 | 98.86±6.24 | t(27)<1, p = 0.89 |
| Duration standards | 749.84±108.87 | 722.93±36.26 | t(27)<1, p = 0.37 |
| Duration deviants | 102.69±14.48 | 98.62±6.50 | t(27) = 1.01, p = 0.35 |
| Pattern standards | 415.57±54.44 | 397.12±6.25 | t(28) = 1.34, p = 0.22 |
| Pattern deviants | 415.71±54.68 | 397.18±6.30 | t(28) = 1.34, p = 0.21 |
*For the spectral analysis, the number of segments for the PPs was randomly selected to match the number of segments for the GPs: 135.35±7.11 native phoneme standards, 77.35±6.14 native phoneme deviants, 136.14±10.02 unknown phoneme standards and 79.42±4.5 unknown phoneme deviants. There were no differences between the groups in the number of segments for any phoneme stimulus (for all t-tests t<1).
Figure 1ERSP for the theta band time-locked to the onset of the native deviant phoneme.
The grey bars depict the time windows where t-tests yielded significant differences (i.e., p<0.05 at least for eight consecutive data points) between the two groups (F3 (74–246 ms), F4 (134–228 ms), Fz (168–236 ms), C3 (90–150 ms), C4 (142–202 ms), and Cz (56–152 ms)).