Literature DB >> 3660618

Dioptric and non-dioptric stimuli for accommodation: target size alone and with blur and chromatic aberration.

P B Kruger1, J Pola.   

Abstract

The frequency response of the accommodative system (0.05-1 Hz) was determined for various combinations of stimuli: changing target size was presented alone, together with defocus blur, and with both defocus blur and chromatic aberration. A high-speed infrared optometer monitored accommodation while the subject viewed the target in a Badal optometer. Target size was varied sinusoidally and blur was provided by moving the target towards and away from the subject at the same frequency. Chromatic aberration was controlled by using either monochromatic (590 nm) or white (3300 K) light. The target was presented under open-loop conditions when size was the only stimulus. We find that besides the conventional dioptric stimuli, changes in target size that result in changes in apparent distance can have substantial effects on accommodation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3660618     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90042-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Is there any difference in using blur as a stimulus for accommodation between emmetropes and myopes?

Authors:  Ai Hong Chen
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Dynamic control of ocular disaccommodation: first and second-order dynamics.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Retinal projections to the accommodation-related area in the rostral superior colliculus of the cat.

Authors:  K Ohtsuka; A Sato
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Aberrations and accommodation.

Authors:  Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Philip B Kruger; Francisco Lara; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Cues for the control of ocular accommodation and vergence during postnatal human development.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  There is more to accommodation of the eye than simply minimizing retinal blur.

Authors:  I Marín-Franch; A J Del Águila-Carrasco; P Bernal-Molina; J J Esteve-Taboada; N López-Gil; R Montés-Micó; P B Kruger
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Dynamic accommodation without feedback does not respond to isolated blur cues.

Authors:  José J Esteve-Taboada; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Paula Bernal-Molina; Norberto López-Gil; Robert Montés-Micó; Philip Kruger; Iván Marín-Franch
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Comparison of three monocular methods for measuring accommodative stimulus-response curves.

Authors:  Yunyun Chen; Wanqing Jin; Zhili Zheng; Chuanchuan Zhang; Huiling Lin; Björn Drobe; Jinhua Bao; Hao Chen
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.742

9.  Human eyes do not need monochromatic aberrations for dynamic accommodation.

Authors:  Paula Bernal-Molina; Iván Marín-Franch; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Jose J Esteve-Taboada; Norberto López-Gil; Philip B Kruger; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.117

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.