Literature DB >> 3658412

[Revision prosthesis for the hip joint in severe bone loss].

H Wagner1.   

Abstract

When total hip prostheses loosen after initial implantation and subsequent prosthesis replacement, increasing bone resorption occurs in the bed of the prosthesis. Finally, a very thin cortex remains in the bed of the prosthesis, which no longer provides sufficient mechanical stability. The replacement prosthesis described, which is anchored in the distal medullary canal without cement, provides a bridge over the damaged prosthesis bed and results in a condition of relative mechanical stability. After implantation of the replacement prosthesis, lively proliferation of the bone tissue occurs in the old prosthesis bed, which again replaces the bone loss that had taken place previously. The late results that would permit a final assessment of the procedure are not yet available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3658412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  25 in total

1.  [Replacement of femoral hip prostheses].

Authors:  M Rudert; M Hoberg; P M Prodinger; R Gradinger; B M Holzapfel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  The Wagner revision stem in alloarthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  C H Hartwig; P Böhm; U Czech; P Reize; W Küsswetter
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Bone stock in revision femoral arthroplasty: a new evaluation.

Authors:  François Canovas; Julien Girard; Olivier Roche; Henri Migaud; François Bonnomet; Mathias Goldschild; Pierre Le Béguec
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  CORR Insights®: Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.

Authors:  Marcus R Streit
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Treatment of an old infection in a total hip replacement with an interim spacer prosthesis.

Authors:  K W Zilkens; H R Casser; J Ohnsorge
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  A new technique to reattach an extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision THA using suture cord.

Authors:  Renuka Reddy Kuruvalli; Ronald Landsmeer; Ujjwal Kanti Debnath; Shivakolundu Pachai Suresh; Tudor Lloyd Thomas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Tapered fluted titanium stems in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Jacob T Munro; Donald S Garbuz; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  [Revision hip arthroplastiy of the hip joint. Revision of the femur: which implant is indicated when?].

Authors:  A Gruner; K-D Heller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Stem modularity alone is not effective in reducing dislocation rate in hip revision surgery.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Pietro Bartolozzi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-11-18

10.  Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis: 22 hips followed for a mean of 6 years.

Authors:  Per Y Adolphson; Mats O F Salemyr; Olof G Sköldenberg; Henrik S G Bodén
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.