Literature DB >> 3657230

The use of non-linear regression analysis and the F test for model discrimination with dose-response curves and ligand binding data.

W G Bardsley1, P B McGinlay.   

Abstract

Computer fitting of binding data is discussed and it is concluded that the main problem is the choice of starting estimates and internal scaling parameters, not the optimization software. Solving linear overdetermined systems of equations for starting estimates is investigated. A function, Q, is introduced to study model discrimination with binding isotherms and the behaviour of Q as a function of model parameters is calculated for the case of 2 and 3 sites. The power function of the F test is estimated for models with 2 to 5 binding sites and necessary constraints on parameters for correct model discrimination are given. The sampling distribution of F test statistics is compared to an exact F distribution using the Chi-squared and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. For low order modes (n less than 3) the F test statistics are approximately F distributed but for higher order models the test statistics are skewed to the left of the F distribution. The parameter covariance matrix obtained by inverting the Hessian matrix of the objective function is shown to be a good approximation to the estimate obtained by Monte Carlo sampling for low order models (n less than 3). It is concluded that analysis of up to 2 or 3 binding sites presents few problems and linear, normal statistical results are valid. To identify correctly 4 sites is much more difficult, requiring very precise data and extreme parameter values. Discrimination of 5 from 4 sites is an upper limit to the usefulness of the F test.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3657230     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80228-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  7 in total

1.  Overcoming transcription activator-like effector (TALE) DNA binding domain sensitivity to cytosine methylation.

Authors:  Julien Valton; Aurélie Dupuy; Fayza Daboussi; Séverine Thomas; Alan Maréchal; Rachel Macmaster; Kevin Melliand; Alexandre Juillerat; Philippe Duchateau
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Analysis of gene-dosage effects on the expression of CD18 by trisomy 21 lymphoblastoid cell-lines using a statistical model to fit flow cytometry profiles.

Authors:  W G Bardsley; B P McMurray; A Robson; S D'Souza; G M Taylor
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Fitting and handling dose response data.

Authors:  Gareth Jones
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  The kinetics of adsorption of human immunoglobulin G to poly(vinyl chloride) enzyme-linked-immunoadsorbent-assay vessel walls.

Authors:  P B McGinlay; W G Bardsley
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1989-08-01       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Rabbit distal colon epithelium: III. Ca2(+)-activated K+ channels in basolateral plasma membrane vesicles of surface and crypt cells.

Authors:  H Wiener; D A Klaerke; P L Jørgensen
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  Mathematical models for growth in alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) embryos developing at different incubation temperatures.

Authors:  W G Bardsley; R A Ackerman; N A Bukhari; D C Deeming; M W Ferguson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Comparison of a multiplexed fluorescent covalent microsphere immunoassay and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for measurement of human immunoglobulin G antibodies to anthrax toxins.

Authors:  Raymond E Biagini; Deborah L Sammons; Jerome P Smith; Barbara A MacKenzie; Cynthia A F Striley; Vera Semenova; Evelen Steward-Clark; Karen Stamey; Alison E Freeman; Conrad P Quinn; John E Snawder
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2004-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.