Literature DB >> 3656197

Quantitative analysis of laryngeal mechanosensitivity in the cat and rabbit.

P J Davis1, B S Nail.   

Abstract

1. Single afferent fibres in the internal branch of the superior laryngeal nerve which responded to light touch or gentle probing of discrete areas of the exposed epithelium of the opened larynx were identified in anaesthetized, paralysed cats (148 fibres) and rabbits (58 fibres). 2. A quantitative examination of the sensitivity of these laryngeal mechanoreceptors to both static (step indentations) and dynamic (vibratory) forms of mechanical stimulation was undertaken using a servo-controlled mechanical stimulator. 3. In both species two predominant classes of mechanoreceptors were observed (Boushey, Richardson, Widdicombe & Wise, 1974). One class was distinguished by a regular and continuous pattern of activity at a frequency of 10-70 Hz (tonic fibres, sixty-six in cat, thirty-five in rabbit). The other class was silent or (more rarely) irregularly active at a very low frequency (silent fibres, eighty-two in cat, twenty-three in rabbit). 4. The location of the receptive fields was determined by manual probing. Inter-species and regional variations in receptive field location were observed for the two fibre groups. 5. Conduction velocity was measured for twenty-one tonic and seven silent fibres in the rabbit by a pre-triggered averaging technique. The results obtained (tonic: range 10.8-30.0, mean +/- S.E. of mean 21.4 +/- 1.2 m/s; silent: 14.8-28.6, 20.4 +/- 1.8 m/s) were characteristic of group III afferent fibres but were not significantly different for the two classes. 6. Both classes of receptor showed a response at the onset of a step indentation of the region of the mucosa that corresponded to their receptive field. Subsequent to this brief initial response the behaviour of the two classes diverged markedly. Tonic fibres were invariably slowly adapting whereas most (forty-four out of fifty-five in cat; twenty-two out of twenty-three in rabbit) silent fibres were rapidly adapting, at least for smaller indentation amplitudes. 7. Receptors of both classes were readily entrained to discharge at the same frequency as the probe stimulator (1:1 entrainment) when this was made to vibrate upon the receptive area for test periods of 0.5 or 1.0 s. Tuning curves were constructed of the minimum amplitudes required to elicit 1:1 entrainment throughout an entire test period at various frequencies. 8. Individual fibres in the two classes could be entrained at frequencies up to 400 Hz or more at sensitive (e.g. less than 100 microns) vibratory amplitudes. However, all fibres were less sensitive at these higher frequencies than at some lower point on the frequency scale.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3656197      PMCID: PMC1192559          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  34 in total

1.  NEURAL ACTIVITY IN MECHANORECEPTIVE CUTANEOUS AFFERENTS: STIMULUS-RESPONSE RELATIONS, WEBER FUNCTIONS, AND INFORMATION TRANSMISSION.

Authors:  G WERNER; V B MOUNTCASTLE
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  [Electrophysiologic study of the sensory neurons of the superior laryngeal nerve].

Authors:  N Mei; B Nourigat
Journal:  C R Seances Soc Biol Fil       Date:  1968-07

3.  Morphology of rapidly and slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the hairless skin of the cat's hind foot.

Authors:  W Jänig
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-05-07       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  "Tactile" stimulus intensity: information transmission by relay neurons in different trigeminal nuclei.

Authors:  I Darian-Smith; M J Rowe; B J Sessle
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The structure and function of the slowly adapting type II mechanoreceptor in hairy skin.

Authors:  M R Chambers; K H Andres; M von Duering; A Iggo
Journal:  Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci       Date:  1972-10

6.  The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand.

Authors:  W H Talbot; I Darian-Smith; H H Kornhuber; V B Mountcastle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A functional analysis of sensory units innervating epiglottis and larynx.

Authors:  A T Storey
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  Adaptation of the generator potential in the crayfish stretch receptors under constant length and constant tension.

Authors:  S Nakajima; K Onodera
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Single unit responses and the total afferent outflow from the cat's foot pad upon mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  W Jänig; R F Schmidt; M Zimmermann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Some aspects of the control of cricothyroid muscle activity.

Authors:  P Rudomin
Journal:  Arch Int Physiol Biochim       Date:  1966-02
View more
  10 in total

1.  Inhibition of inspiratory motor output by high-frequency low-pressure oscillations in the upper airway of sleeping dogs.

Authors:  P R Eastwood; M Satoh; A K Curran; M T Zayas; C A Smith; J A Dempsey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Suppression of thyroarytenoid muscle responses during repeated air pressure stimulation of the laryngeal mucosa in awake humans.

Authors:  Pamela Reed Kearney; Christopher J Poletto; Eric A Mann; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Laryngeal muscle responses to mechanical displacement of the thyroid cartilage in humans.

Authors:  Torrey M J Loucks; Christopher J Poletto; Keith G Saxon; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2005-06-02

4.  Evidence that an internal schema adapts swallowing to upper airway requirements.

Authors:  Seng Mun Wong; Rickie J Domangue; Sidney Fels; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Central nervous system control of the laryngeal muscles in humans.

Authors:  Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 1.931

6.  Laryngeal Vibration Increases Spontaneous Swallowing Rates in Chronic Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Proof-of-Principle Pilot Study.

Authors:  Erin Kamarunas; Seng Mun Wong; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 7.  Research priorities in spasmodic dysphonia.

Authors:  Christy L Ludlow; Charles H Adler; Gerald S Berke; Steven A Bielamowicz; Andrew Blitzer; Susan B Bressman; Mark Hallett; H A Jinnah; Uwe Juergens; Sandra B Martin; Joel S Perlmutter; Christine Sapienza; Andrew Singleton; Caroline M Tanner; Gayle E Woodson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 8.  Sensory feedback control of mammalian vocalizations.

Authors:  Michael S Smotherman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Vibration over the larynx increases swallowing and cortical activation for swallowing.

Authors:  Rachel W Mulheren; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Sensory Innervation of the Larynx and the Search for Mucosal Mechanoreceptors.

Authors:  Alexander G Foote; Susan L Thibeault
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.297

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.