Literature DB >> 21341895

Status-based asymmetry in intergroup responses: Implications for intergroup reconciliation.

Thomas E Malloy1, Tiina Ristikari, Rosalie Berrios-Candelaria, Beth Lewis, Fredric Agatstein.   

Abstract

We studied intergroup responses as a function of relative intergroup status and familiarity. In Study 1, 34 African Americans and 34 European Americans interacted with two members of the out-group in separate, 20-min dyadic interactions. Intergroup perception, affect, and behavior were asymmetric; Blacks differentiated the traits of and the quality of interactions with Whites, whereas Whites did not make these differentiations. Blacks and Whites predicted that different out-group partners perceived them similarly. Study 2 showed that the failure to differentiate an out-group member is due to intergroup status differences. Asymmetric intergroup responses pose a barrier to intergroup reconciliation and explain, in part, why increased interracial contact has not eradicated disparities in life outcomes for Black Americans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21341895      PMCID: PMC3454514          DOI: 10.1037/a0021666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol        ISSN: 1077-341X


  22 in total

1.  Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: evidence that more powerful groups are more variable.

Authors:  Ana Guinote; Charles M Judd; Markus Brauer
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-05

2.  An fMRI investigation of the impact of interracial contact on executive function.

Authors:  Jennifer A Richeson; Abigail A Baird; Heather L Gordon; Todd F Heatherton; Carrie L Wyland; Sophie Trawalter; J Nicole Shelton
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-16       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  A recurrent connectionist model of group biases.

Authors:  Dirk Van Rooy; Frank Van Overwalle; Tim Vanhoomissen; Christophe Labiouse; Robert French
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Role of meaningful subgroups in explaining differences in perceived variability for in-groups and out-groups.

Authors:  B Park; C S Ryan; C M Judd
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1992-10

5.  An information search model of evaluative concerns in intergroup interaction.

Authors:  Jacquie D Vorauer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Direct and indirect intergroup friendship effects: testing the moderating role of the affective-cognitive bases of prejudice.

Authors:  Stefania Paolini; Miles Hewstone; Ed Cairns
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-08-06

7.  Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: empirical evidence and a computer simulation.

Authors:  P W Linville; G W Fischer; P Salovey
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1989-08

Review 8.  Consensus in interpersonal perception: acquaintance and the big five.

Authors:  D A Kenny; L Albright; T E Malloy; D A Kashy
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Individual differences and cross-situational consistency of dyadic social behavior.

Authors:  Thomas E Malloy; Suzy Barcelos; Elise Arruda; Michael DeRosa; Crystal Fonseca
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-10

10.  Motivational influences on impression formation: outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes.

Authors:  S L Neuberg; S T Fiske
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Interpersonal Attraction in Dyads and Groups: Effects of the Hearts of the Beholder and the Beheld.

Authors:  Thomas E Malloy
Journal:  Eur J Soc Psychol       Date:  2017-05-25

2.  Implications for the Self Determine Benevolence and Self-Protection in Intergroup Relations.

Authors:  Thomas E Malloy; Lorin Kinney
Journal:  Self Identity       Date:  2016-10-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.