Literature DB >> 3654388

Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability.

B L Lonsbury-Martin1, G K Martin, R Probst, A C Coats.   

Abstract

In contrast to evoked otoacoustic emissions, acoustic distortion products (DPs) recorded from the ear canal are present at predictable frequencies with respect to their primary tones, f1 and f2. Such specificity may provide detailed frequency-place information concerning the functional state of limited regions of the organ of Corti following experimental intervention. However, to date, it is not clear whether emitted DPs solely reflect activity at the basilar-membrane regions of primary tones or if the remote DP site makes a significant contribution to the emitted signal measured in the ear canal. We have investigated a number of the general features of acoustic-DP generation in the rabbit so that, in later experiments, the contributions of specific basilar-membrane regions involved in generating these DPs can be identified using techniques designed to manipulate their normal properties. The first report describes the outcome of systematic manipulations of a number of stimulus conditions and alterations to the physiological state of the cochlea by exposure to fatiguing sound or anoxia. Experimental findings for the 2f1-f2 DP showed that, in general, the relations of the levels and frequency of the primary tones to DP magnitude were consistent with previously published data from other mammalian species. Additional observations for other odd-order intermodulation DPs at the 3f1-2f2 and 2f2-f1 frequencies suggested that the basic attributes of the acoustic DPs were similarly affected by systematic manipulation of the basic parameters of the primary tones and the general metabolic state of the cochlea. General anesthesia, however, did not affect DP amplitude. A companion paper describes the results of a series of subsequent experiments using response-suppression, interfering-tone, and temporary threshold shift techniques which address more directly the issue of which basilar-membrane sites contribute to the generation of different acoustic DPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3654388     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(87)90048-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  9 in total

1.  A longitudinal study of changes in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds in an industrial setting.

Authors:  Antonis Moukos; Dimitrios G Balatsouras; Thomas Nikolopoulos; Pavlos Maragoudakis; Evangelos I Yiotakis; Stavros G Korres; Dimitrios Kandiloros
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Optimizing distortion product otoacoustic emission recordings in normal-hearing ears by adopting cochlear place-specific stimuli.

Authors:  Samantha Stiepan; Shawn S Goodman; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): parameter optimization.

Authors:  M D Valero; E G Pasanen; D McFadden; R Ratnam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission (DPOAE) as an Appropriate Tool in Assessment of Otoprotective Effects of Antioxidants in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL).

Authors:  Afsaneh Doosti; Yones Lotfi; Abdollah Moosavi; Enayatollah Bakhshi; Azita Hajhossein Talasaz
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-04-17

5.  Distortion products and their influence on representation of pitch-relevant information in the human brainstem for unresolved harmonic complex tones.

Authors:  Christopher J Smalt; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Cochlear sensitivity in the lesser spear-nosed bat, Phyllostomus discolor.

Authors:  Anna Wittekindt; Markus Drexl; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-09-18       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Assessment of aminoglycoside-induced hearing impairment in hospitalized neonates by TEOAE.

Authors:  Mohammad Naeimi; Gholamali Maamouri; Hassan Boskabadi; Sadegh Golparvar; Mohamadreza Taleh; Habib Esmaeeli; Javad Khademi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-01-09

8.  Assessment of the influence of whole body vibration on Cochlear function.

Authors:  Seyyed-Ali Moussavi-Najarkola; Ali Khavanin; Ramazan Mirzaei; Mojdeh Salehnia; Mehdi Akbari
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.646

9.  Multivariate search for differentially expressed gene combinations.

Authors:  Yuanhui Xiao; Robert Frisina; Alexander Gordon; Lev Klebanov; Andrei Yakovlev
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.