Literature DB >> 3631200

Clinical method for measuring adaptation of tonic accommodation and vergence accommodation.

T K Tsuetaki, C M Schor.   

Abstract

Previous work indicates that tonic adapters of accommodation and vergence have indirect effects on accommodative vergence and vergence accommodation and that these crosslink responses interact with one another to produce clear and single vision. Clinical measurements of tonic accommodation, tonic vergence, vergence accommodation (CA/C ratio), and accommodative vergence (AC/A ratio) are therefore of value in determining possible binocular vision abnormalities. Currently, clinical methods are only available for measuring the tonic vergence (phoria) and the AC/A ratio. We have determined a fast and accurate method for evaluating both tonic accommodation (accommodative phoria) and vergence accommodation (CA/C ratio). In both procedures, the loop of accommodation was opened with a 0.2 cpd difference of Gaussian (DOG) target. This target was found to be incapable of stimulating any reflex accommodation, yet it is localized in space and can easily stimulate binocular fixation. Our results indicate that opening the loop of accommodation with a pinhole Maxwellian view or with a 0.2 cpd DOG produces similar response values for tonic accommodative aftereffects and vergence accommodation responses. The decay rate of tonic accommodative aftereffects as well as changes in the resting focus of accommodation caused by vergence accommodation (CA/C) can be measured clinically using dynamic retinoscopy in combination with the DOG target. Clinical values of the CA/C ratio obtained with these techniques were highly correlated (r = 0.92) with laboratory measures obtained with an objective infrared optometer and eye trac monitor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3631200     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-198706000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0093-7002


  10 in total

1.  Cross-coupling between accommodation and convergence is optimized for a broad range of directions and distances of gaze.

Authors:  Dorothy Nguyen; Indu Vedamurthy; Clifton Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The first and second order dynamics of accommodative convergence and disparity convergence.

Authors:  James Maxwell; Jianliang Tong; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Short-term adaptation of accommodation, accommodative vergence and disparity vergence facility.

Authors:  James Maxwell; Jianliang Tong; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Accommodative and vergence responses to conflicting blur and disparity stimuli during development.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The use of cues to convergence and accommodation in naïve, uninstructed participants.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The influence of first near-spectacle reading correction on accommodation and its interaction with convergence.

Authors:  Indu Vedamurthy; Wendy W Harrison; Yue Liu; Ian Cox; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Developmental changes in the balance of disparity, blur, and looming/proximity cues to drive ocular alignment and focus.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  The distribution of negative and positive relative accommodation and their relationship with binocular and refractive indices in a young population.

Authors:  AbbasAli Yekta; Hassan Hashemi; Mehdi Khabazkhoob; Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Somayeh Ghasemi-Moghaddam; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Fereshteh Shokrollahzadeh
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-21

Review 9.  Accommodative anomalies in children.

Authors:  Yogesh Shukla
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Disparity-driven vs blur-driven models of accommodation and convergence in binocular vision and intermittent strabismus.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.220

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.