Literature DB >> 18281073

Cross-coupling between accommodation and convergence is optimized for a broad range of directions and distances of gaze.

Dorothy Nguyen1, Indu Vedamurthy, Clifton Schor.   

Abstract

Accommodation and convergence systems are cross-coupled so that stimulation of one system produces responses by both systems. Ideally, the cross-coupled responses of accommodation and convergence match their respective stimuli. When expressed in diopters and meter angles, respectively, stimuli for accommodation and convergence are equal in the mid-sagittal plane when viewed with symmetrical convergence, where historically, the gains of the cross coupling (AC/A and CA/C ratios) have been quantified. However, targets at non-zero azimuth angles, when viewed with asymmetric convergence, present unequal stimuli for accommodation and convergence. Are the cross-links between the two systems calibrated to compensate for stimulus mismatches that increase with gaze-azimuth? We measured the response AC/A and stimulus CA/C ratios at zero azimuth, 17.5 and 30 deg of rightward gaze eccentricities with a Badal Optometer and Wheatstone-mirror haploscope. AC/A ratios were measured under open-loop convergence conditions along the iso-accommodation circle (locus of points that stimulate approximately equal amounts of accommodation to the two eyes at all azimuth angles). CA/C ratios were measured under open-loop accommodation conditions along the iso-vergence circle (locus of points that stimulate constant convergence at all azimuth angles). Our results show that the gain of accommodative-convergence (AC/A ratio) decreased and the bias of convergence-accommodation increased at the 30 deg gaze eccentricity. These changes are in directions that compensate for stimulus mismatches caused by spatial-viewing geometry during asymmetric convergence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18281073      PMCID: PMC2323401          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  24 in total

1.  Most naturally occurring human saccades have magnitudes of 15 degrees or less.

Authors:  A T Bahill; D Adler; L Stark
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-06

2.  The adaptive effect of narrowing the interocular separation on the AC/A ratio.

Authors:  Bai-Chuan Jiang; Ramkumar Ramamirtham
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Prism induced accommodation in infants 3 to 6 months of age.

Authors:  W R Bobier; A Guinta; S Kurtz; H C Howland
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Voluntary effort as a stimulus to accommodation and vergence.

Authors:  L N McLin; C M Schor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Combined effects of spatial frequency and retinal eccentricity upon fixation disparity.

Authors:  C Schor; M Wesson; K M Robertson
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1986-08

6.  Optically induced changes in the couplings between vergence and accommodation.

Authors:  F A Miles; S J Judge; L M Optican
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Clinical method for measuring adaptation of tonic accommodation and vergence accommodation.

Authors:  T K Tsuetaki; C M Schor
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1987-06

8.  Changes in the coupling between accommodation and vergence eye movements induced in human subjects by altering the effective interocular separation.

Authors:  S J Judge; F A Miles
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Convergence accommodation.

Authors:  D Kersten; G E Legge
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1983-03

10.  Graphical analysis of prism adaptation, convergence accommodation, and accommodative convergence.

Authors:  C M Schor; V Narayan
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1982-10
View more
  3 in total

1.  The first and second order dynamics of accommodative convergence and disparity convergence.

Authors:  James Maxwell; Jianliang Tong; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Binocular Function in Different Gaze Positions.

Authors:  Amir Asharlous; Asgar Doostdar; Vahid Ghaemi; Mina Farzi; Abbasali Yekta; Abolghasem Mortazavi; Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2022-04-29

3.  The influence of first near-spectacle reading correction on accommodation and its interaction with convergence.

Authors:  Indu Vedamurthy; Wendy W Harrison; Yue Liu; Ian Cox; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.799

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.