Literature DB >> 3627821

Decompression of the spinal cord improves recovery after acute experimental spinal cord compression injury.

A Guha, C H Tator, L Endrenyi, I Piper.   

Abstract

The value of decompression after spinal cord injury in patients is still an unresolved issue. It has previously been shown in our laboratory that functional recovery in rats after cord compression varied with both the force and time until decompression. However, the longest duration studied was only 15 minutes, which is far less than that usually encountered in clinical practice, and therefore, the present study was undertaken to determine the value of decompression after more prolonged periods of compression. A factorially designed experiment with five rats per cell was used with the clip compression injury model. Forces of 2.3, 16.9 or 53.0 gms were applied at C7-T1 until decompression was performed after 15, 60, 120, or 240 minutes of compression. Functional recovery was assessed weekly for 8 weeks using the inclined plane technique. Maximum and minimum performance limits were established in normal rats and rats with cord transection, respectively. Univariate analysis and multiple comparison tests were used to analyse the data. The major determinant of recovery was the force of the injury. For example, the animals injured by the 2.3 gm clip performed significantly better than those injured at higher forces for all times until decompression (p less than 0.0001), and there was a significant difference in recovery between the groups injured by the 16.9 and 53.0 gm clips, although only for the 15 minutes until decompression group (p less than 0.05). The time until decompression also affected recovery, but only for the lighter compression forces (2.3 and 16.9 gm). For example, animals decompressed after 60 minutes of 2.3 gm compression recovered significantly better than those decompressed after 240 minutes (p less than 0.05). Thus, if the initial injury force is small, decompression is beneficial even after prolonged injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3627821     DOI: 10.1038/sc.1987.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paraplegia        ISSN: 0031-1758


  33 in total

Review 1.  Acute spinal cord injury: monitoring and anaesthetic implications.

Authors:  A M Lam
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 2.  Spinal cord injury: a systematic review of current treatment options.

Authors:  David W Cadotte; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Timing of decompressive surgery of spinal cord after traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based examination of pre-clinical and clinical studies.

Authors:  Julio C Furlan; Vanessa Noonan; David W Cadotte; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 4.  Traumatic spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  Naveen Kumar; Aheed Osman; J R Chowdhury
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-07-01

Review 5.  Current and future medical therapeutic strategies for the functional repair of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Tevfik Yılmaz; Erkan Kaptanoğlu
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-18

6.  Intramedullary Lesion Length on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a Strong Predictor of ASIA Impairment Scale Grade Conversion Following Decompressive Surgery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Bizhan Aarabi; Charles A Sansur; David M Ibrahimi; J Marc Simard; David S Hersh; Elizabeth Le; Cara Diaz; Jennifer Massetti; Noori Akhtar-Danesh
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Efficacy of surgical decompression in regard to motor recovery in the setting of conus medullaris injury.

Authors:  Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Alexander R Vaccaro; Mehdi Mohammadi
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  The influence of time from injury to surgery on motor recovery and length of hospital stay in acute traumatic spinal cord injury: an observational Canadian cohort study.

Authors:  Marcel F Dvorak; Vanessa K Noonan; Nader Fallah; Charles G Fisher; Joel Finkelstein; Brian K Kwon; Carly S Rivers; Henry Ahn; Jérôme Paquet; Eve C Tsai; Andrea Townson; Najmedden Attabib; Christopher S Bailey; Sean D Christie; Brian Drew; Daryl R Fourney; Richard Fox; R John Hurlbert; Michael G Johnson; A G Linassi; Stefan Parent; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  The effect of duration of compression on lipid peroxidation after experimental spinal cord injury.

Authors:  M Y Kaynar; M Hanci; A Kafadar; K Gümüştaş; A Belce; N Ciplak
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.042

10.  Spinal cord decompression reduces rat neural cell apoptosis secondary to spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Kan Xu; Qi-xin Chen; Fang-cai Li; Wei-shan Chen; Min Lin; Qiong-hua Wu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.066

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.