Literature DB >> 36273038

Using bioelectrohydrogenesis left-over residues as a future potential fertilizer for soil amendment.

Fabrice Ndayisenga1,2,3, Zhisheng Yu4,5,6, Bobo Wang1,3, Jie Yang1,2,3, Gang Wu1,7, Hongxun Zhang1,2,3.   

Abstract

In this current research, the left-over residues collected from the dark fermentation-microbial electrolysis cells (DF-MEC) integrated system solely biocatalyzed by activated sludge during the bioconversion of the agricultural straw wastes into hydrogen energy, was investigated for its feasibility to be used as a potential alternative biofertilizer to the commonly costly inorganic ones. The results revealed that the electrohydrogenesis left-over residues enriched various plant growth-promoting microbial communities including Enterobacter (8.57%), Paenibacillus (1.18%), Mycobacterium (0.77%), Pseudomonas (0.65%), Bradyrhizobium (0.12%), Azospirillum (0.11%), and Mesorhizobium (0.1%) that are generally known for their ability to produce different essential phytohormones such as indole-3-acetic acid/indole acetic acid (IAA) and Gibberellins for plant growth. Moreover, they also contain both phosphate-solubilizing and nitrogen-fixing microbial communities that remarkably provide an adequate amount of assimilable phosphorus and nitrogen required for enhanced plants or crop growth. Furthermore, macro-, and micronutrients (including N, P, K, etc.) were all analyzed from the residues and detected adequate appreciate concentrations required for plant growth promotions. The direct application of MEC-effluent as fertilizer in this current study conspicuously promoted plant growth (Solanum lycopersicum L. (tomato), Capsicum annuum L. (chilli), and Solanum melongena L. (brinjal)) and speeded up flowering and fruit-generating processes. Based on these findings, electrohydrogenesis residues could undoubtedly be considered as a potential biofertilizer. Thus, this technology provides a new approach to agricultural residue control and concomitantly provides a sustainable, cheap, and eco-friendly biofertilizer that could replace the chemical costly fertilizers.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36273038     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22715-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  18 in total

1.  Assessing amendment and fertilizing properties of digestates from anaerobic digestion through a comparative study with digested sludge and compost.

Authors:  Fulvia Tambone; Barbara Scaglia; Giuliana D'Imporzano; Andrea Schievano; Valentina Orzi; Silvia Salati; Fabrizio Adani
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization.

Authors:  J B Holm-Nielsen; T Al Seadi; P Oleskowicz-Popiel
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 4.  Biofertilizers: a potential approach for sustainable agriculture development.

Authors:  Trishna Mahanty; Surajit Bhattacharjee; Madhurankhi Goswami; Purnita Bhattacharyya; Bannhi Das; Abhrajyoti Ghosh; Prosun Tribedi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Comparative characterization of digestate versus pig slurry and cow manure - Chemical composition and effects on soil microbial activity.

Authors:  Kajsa Risberg; Harald Cederlund; Mikael Pell; Veronica Arthurson; Anna Schnürer
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 7.145

6.  Gut region induces gastrointestinal microbiota community shift in Ujimqin sheep (Ovis aries): from a multi-domain perspective.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Zhisheng Yu; Bobo Wang; Fabrice Ndayisenga
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 5.491

7.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data.

Authors:  J Gregory Caporaso; Justin Kuczynski; Jesse Stombaugh; Kyle Bittinger; Frederic D Bushman; Elizabeth K Costello; Noah Fierer; Antonio Gonzalez Peña; Julia K Goodrich; Jeffrey I Gordon; Gavin A Huttley; Scott T Kelley; Dan Knights; Jeremy E Koenig; Ruth E Ley; Catherine A Lozupone; Daniel McDonald; Brian D Muegge; Meg Pirrung; Jens Reeder; Joel R Sevinsky; Peter J Turnbaugh; William A Walters; Jeremy Widmann; Tanya Yatsunenko; Jesse Zaneveld; Rob Knight
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 8.  A contribution to set a legal framework for biofertilisers.

Authors:  E Malusá; N Vassilev
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  An overview of heat stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.).

Authors:  Muhammed Alsamir; Tariq Mahmood; Richard Trethowan; Nabil Ahmad
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.219

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.