Literature DB >> 20825964

Assessing amendment and fertilizing properties of digestates from anaerobic digestion through a comparative study with digested sludge and compost.

Fulvia Tambone1, Barbara Scaglia, Giuliana D'Imporzano, Andrea Schievano, Valentina Orzi, Silvia Salati, Fabrizio Adani.   

Abstract

Digestate, with biogas represents the final products of anaerobic digestion (AD). The methane-rich biogas is used to produce electricity and heat, whereas the digestate could be valorized in agriculture. Contrarily to well-recognized biomasses such as digested sludge and compost, the properties of the digestate are not well known and its agricultural use remains unexplored. In this work, a first attempt to study the agronomic properties of digestates was performed by comparing the chemical, spectroscopic, and biological characteristics of digestates with those of compost and digested sludge, used as reference organic matrices. A total of 23 organic matrices were studied, which include eight ingestates and relative digestates, three composts, and four digested sludges. The analytical data obtained was analyzed using principal component analysis to better show in detail similarities or differences between the organic matrices studied. The results showed that digestates differed from ingestates and also from compost, although the starting organic mix influenced the digestate final characteristics. With respect to amendment properties, it seems that biological parameters, more than chemical characteristics, were more important in describing these features. In this way, amendment properties could be ranked as follows: compost≅digestate>digested sludge≫ingestate. As to fertilizer properties, AD allowed getting a final product (digestate) with very good fertilizing properties because of the high nutrient content (N, P, K) in available form. In this way, the digestate appears to be a very good candidate to replace inorganic fertilizers, also contributing, to the short-term soil organic matter turnover.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20825964     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  19 in total

1.  Solid-state anaerobic co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal waste and sawdust: impact of co-digestion ratio, inoculum-to-substrate ratio, and total solids.

Authors:  Fazel Ziaee; Nader Mokhtarani; Kasra Pourrostami Niavol
Journal:  Biodegradation       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 3.909

2.  Concentration of trace metals in winter wheat and spring barley as a result of digestate, cattle slurry, and mineral fertilizer application.

Authors:  Przemysław Barłóg; Lukáš Hlisnikovský; Eva Kunzová
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Using bioelectrohydrogenesis left-over residues as a future potential fertilizer for soil amendment.

Authors:  Fabrice Ndayisenga; Zhisheng Yu; Bobo Wang; Jie Yang; Gang Wu; Hongxun Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Replacement of mineral fertilizers with anaerobically digested pig slurry in paddy fields: assessment of plant growth and grain quality.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Minyan Wang; Yucheng Cao; Peng Liang; Shengchun Wu; Anna Oi Wah Leung; Peter Christie
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Screening of 18 species for digestate phytodepuration.

Authors:  Francesca Pavan; Simone Breschigliaro; Maurizio Borin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Barriers and incentives to the production of bioethanol from cereal straw: A farm business perspective.

Authors:  N J Glithero; S J Ramsden; P Wilson
Journal:  Energy Policy       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.142

7.  Initial Effects of Differently Treated Biogas Residues from Municipal and Industrial Wastes on Spring Barley Yield Formation.

Authors:  Nadia Prays; Martin Kaupenjohann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  A Review on the Valorization of Macroalgal Wastes for Biomethane Production.

Authors:  Yann Nicolas Barbot; Hashem Al-Ghaili; Roland Benz
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 9.  An Overview of the Control of Bacterial Pathogens in Cattle Manure.

Authors:  Christy E Manyi-Loh; Sampson N Mamphweli; Edson L Meyer; Golden Makaka; Michael Simon; Anthony I Okoh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Persistence and Potential Viable but Non-culturable State of Pathogenic Bacteria during Storage of Digestates from Agricultural Biogas Plants.

Authors:  Geraldine Maynaud; Anne-Marie Pourcher; Christine Ziebal; Anais Cuny; Céline Druilhe; Jean-Philippe Steyer; Nathalie Wéry
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.