| Literature DB >> 36267080 |
Nan Jia1, Chongze Yang2.
Abstract
In order to further improve the effect of music teaching, more music psychology should be applied in music teaching to assist teaching, and students should better understand the emotional elements reflected in music through music emotion and cognitive teaching. This essay starts from the relationship between music emotion and cognition, to deeply explore the application of music psychology in teaching activities, through the construction of music education psychological regulation function model to explore the effect of the application of psychology in music teaching. The results showed that the scores of positive emotions were significantly improved, while the scores of negative emotions were significantly decreased. The difference between the improvement and reduction of positive emotions was significant (p < 0.01, p < 0.01). The results show that psychology based on the relationship between emotions and people is helpful to improve the effectiveness of music teaching. And on this basis put forward the music teaching activity innovation path.Entities:
Keywords: emotion and cognition; music teaching; negative emotion; positive emotion; psychology
Year: 2022 PMID: 36267080 PMCID: PMC9577505 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1011249
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Variable selection design table.
| Listening style (B) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soundscape music (a1) | Abdominal breathing (b1) | Thoracic breathing (b2) | ||
| Music choice (A) | O1:b1a1 | O2: b2a1 | Oa1 | |
| Non-soundscape music(a2) | O3:B1a2 | O4: B2a2 | Oa2 | |
| Ob1 | Ob2 | |||
Factor loads, commonality and CR values of PANAS-R items.
| Project | Load factorPA | NA | Common degrees | CR value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active | 0.861 | 0.740 | 7.602 | |
| Enthusiastic | 0.859 | 0.762 | 13.361 | |
| Happy | 0.809 | 0.770 | 12.752 | |
| Elated | 0.798 | 0.669 | 13.866 | |
| Excitedly | 0.773 | 0.599 | 16.102 | |
| Proud | 0.763 | 0.602 | 12.173 | |
| Delighted | 0.739 | 0.565 | 15.539 | |
| Energetic | 0.712 | 0.512 | 12.827 | |
| Grateful | 0.567 | 0.388 | 14.723 | |
| Ashamed | 0.750 | 0.563 | 8.475 | |
| Sad | 0.748 | 0.587 | 7.386 | |
| Afraid | 0.745 | 0.554 | 10.635 | |
| Nervous | 0.712 | 0.509 | 7.250 | |
| Terrified | 0.683 | 0.468 | 10.420 | |
| Guilty | 0.572 | 0.331 | 8.978 | |
| Irritable | 0.554 | 0.335 | 7.687 | |
| Jittery | 0.529 | 0.386 | 8.283 | |
| Irritated | 0.461 | 0.389 | 6.646 |
PA, positive emotion; NA, negative emotion; CR value is significant at P < 0.001 level. The revised PANAS-R scale included nine words for describing positive emotions and nine words for describing negative emotions, and participants were required to describe the experience of emotional words on a 5-point Likert scale. The internal consistency coefficients were 0.79 and 0.80, respectively.
Experimental process arrangement.
| Conditions | Process | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 127 s | 127 s | 127 s | 127 s | 127 s | 127 s | 127 s | 127 s | |
| 1 | Baseline 1 | Soundscape music | Baseline 2 | Non-soundscape music | Baseline 3 | Soundscape music | Baseline 4 | Non-soundscape music |
| 2 | Baseline 1 | Soundscape music | Baseline 2 | Non-soundscape music | Baseline 3 | Non-soundscape music | Baseline 4 | Soundscape music |
| 3 | Baseline 1 | Non-soundscape music | Baseline 2 | Soundscape music | Baseline 3 | Soundscape music | Baseline 4 | Non-soundscape music |
| 4 | Baseline 1 | Non-soundscape music | Baseline 2 | Soundscape music | Baseline 3 | Non-soundscape music | Baseline 4 | Soundscape music |
Self-rating scale reports the results of ANOVA.
| Emotional type | The mean square | The | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active | 44.681 | 35.006*** | 0.000 |
| Enthusiastic | 38.234 | 25.392*** | 0.011 |
| Happy | 39.011 | 29.865** | 0.022 |
| Elated | 42.568 | 40.335** | 0.031 |
| Excitedly | 39.082 | 22.484* | 0.041 |
| Proud | 31.220 | 32.609*** | 0.122 |
| Delighted | 30.992 | 26.804* | 0.023 |
| Energetic | 41.221 | 32.469*** | 0.015 |
| Grateful | 30.145 | 22.557* | 0.063 |
| Ashamed | 0.841 | 6.358* | 0.108 |
| Sad | 0.216 | 3.781* | 0.197 |
| Afraid | 1.292 | 5.880** | 0.098 |
| Nervous | 1.414 | 4.589** | 0.235 |
| Terrified | 0.291 | 10.220* | 0.645 |
| Guilty | 1.541 | 5.667* | 0.891 |
| Irritable | 2.385 | 3.475** | 0.100 |
| Jittery | 3.013 | 0.691* | 0.092 |
| Irritated | 2.991 | 0.407* | 0.450 |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Difference of positive emotion and negative emotion before and after test under different conditions.
| Conditions | Positive emotions ( | Negative emotions ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-test (M ± SD) | Posttest (M ± SD) | Sig. | Pre-test (M ± SD) | Posttest (M ± SD) | Sig. | |
| I | 15.89 ± 4.22 | 23.91 ± 6.14 | 5.62 | 14.97 ± 3.49 | 12.95 ± 2.94 | −3.54 |
| II | 16.07 ± 5.09 | 21.64 ± 7.45 | 4.99 | 14.33 ± 4.58 | 13.27 ± 3.96 | −3.86 |
| III | 16.79 ± 4.22 | 21.01 ± 6.14 | 5.62 | 15.97 ± 3.49 | 12.95 ± 2.94 | −3.54 |
| IV | 14.97 ± 5.09 | 15.02 ± 7.45 | 4.99 | 15.33 ± 4.58 | 15.57 ± 3.96 | −3.86 |
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001.
Figure 1Difference of positive emotion before and after test under different conditions.
Figure 2The difference of negative emotions measured before and after different conditions.
Descriptive statistical results of physiological indicators.
| Soundscape music ( | Non-soundscape music ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal breathing | Thoracic breathing | Abdominal breathing | Thoracic breathing | |||||
| M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | |
| STS | 1.9531 | 1.2468 | 1.66647 | 0.9332 | 0.113888 | 1.71809 | −0.009783 | 0.75689 |
| SCR | −7.02722 | 2.061785 | −5.014174 | 2.0639674 | −3.396138 | 2.0639679 | −1.574833 | 1.529027 |
| BVP | −8.056602 | 1.3467893 | −3.772575 | 1.4263564 | −2.58998 | 1.5641307 | −0.0737 | 1.093805 |
| EMG | −10.22204 | 3.0723889 | −4.759364 | 3.6875054 | −4.879805 | 2.2548016 | 0.580964 | 2.5944441 |
Results of within-subject effect test of skin temperature (STS) index.
| The source | Type III sum of squares | df | The mean square | F | Sig. | Partial Eta square |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Music | 98.868 | 1 | 98.868 | 75.667 | 0.000 | 0.709 |
| Error (music) | 40.501 | 31 | 1.300 | |||
| breath | 1.344 | 1 | 1.346 | 0.723 | 0.402 | 0.024 |
| Error (breath) | 57.653 | 31 | 1.860 | |||
| Music * breath | 0.214 | 1 | 0.211 | 0.204 | 0.655 | 0.007 |
| Error (music * breath) | 32.412 | 31 | 1.045 |
Results of intra subject effect test of electroskin (SCR) index.
| Test for intra-subject contrast in SCR | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The source | Type III sum of squares | df | The mean square | F | Sig. | Partial Eta square |
| Music | 399.931 | 1 | 399.935 | 77.941 | 0 | 0.714 |
| Error (music) | 159.054 | 31 | 5.132 | |||
| Breath | 117.627 | 1 | 117.622 | 21.571 | 0 | 0.410 |
| Error (breath) | 169.045 | 31 | 5.453 | |||
| Music * breath | 0.293 | 1 | 0.294 | 0.095 | 0.758 | 0.003 |
| Error (music * breath) | 95.232 | 31 | 3.075 | |||
Results of within-subject effect test of heart rate (BVP) index.
| Test for intra-subject contrast of BVP | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The source | Type III sum of squares | df | The mean square | F | sig. |
| Music | 672.063 | 1 | 672.068 | 450.21 | 0.000 |
| Error (music) | 46.271 | 31 | 1.492 | ||
| Breath | 369.946 | 1 | 369.945 | 214.20 | 0.000 |
| Error (breath) | 53.541 | 31 | 1.727 | ||
| Music * breath | 25.001 | 1 | 25.002 | 11.023 | 0.002 |
| Error (music * breath) | 70.296 | 31 | 2.268 | ||
Test results of paired samples of heart rate (BVP) index.
| Paired sample | M | sD | Standard error of the mean | 95% confidence interval | t | df | Sig. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The lower limit | Upper limit | ||||||||
| 1 | SM AB vs. TB | −4.2840353 | 2.1212586 | 3,749,892 | −5.0488304 | −3.5192398 | −11.425 | 31 | 0 |
| 2 | NSM AB vs. TB | −2.5162085 | 1.8680951 | 3,302,358 | −3.1897285 | −1.8426887 | −7.619 | 31 | 0 |
| 3 | AB SM vs. NSM | −5.4666992 | 1.9948600 | 3,526,430 | −6.1859191 | −4.7474792 | −15.502 | 31 | 0 |
| 4 | TB SM vs. NSM | −3.6988725 | 1.8817799 | 3,326,549 | −4.3773263 | −3.0204184 | −11.119 | 31 | 0 |
Results of intra-subject effect test of electromyography (EMG) index.
| Test for intra-subject contrast of BVP | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The source | III type of sum of squares | df | The mean square | F | Sig. |
| Music | 912.932 | 1 | 912.931 | 94.566 | 0.000*** |
| Error (music) | 299.275 | 31 | 9.653 | ||
| Breath | 954.571 | 1 | 954.58 | 109.830 | 0.000*** |
| Error (breath) | 269.438 | 31 | 8.692 | ||
| Music * breath | 2.87E-05 | 1 | 2.87E-05 | 0.000 | 0.998 |
| Error (music * breath) | 181.984 | 31 | 5.871 | ||
Figure 3Hargreaves’ model of music education resources.
Figure 4Hargreaves’ potential functional model of music education.
Figure 5Psychological adjustment function model of music education.