Literature DB >> 36264451

Reliability of submaximal stimulation for the train-of-four test using acceleromyography and electromyography with individualized stimulation currents.

Gi Year Lee1, Sooyoung Cho2,3, Hee Jung Baik1,4, Jong Wha Lee1,4, Jae Hee Woo4,5, Hyun Jung Lee4,5, Seung Hee Yoo1,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The supramaximal stimulation (SMS) of the TOF test causes uncomfortable sensations in patients. We aimed to determine whether the submaximal stimulation would be reliable in TOF tests with reduced painful sensation.
METHODS: The accelomyography (AMG) and electromyography (EMG) monitor was applied at each arm and general anesthesia was induced and maintained by total intravenous anesthesia. At extubation, we conducted TOF test three times at each of four different currents: SMS, 70% SMS, 50% SMS, and 30% SMS. The same procedure was performed in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) only with EMG, and the pain scores on the numerical rating scale (NRS) during the tests were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were enrolled. At extubation, TOF ratios with SMS in AMG and EMG were 112.0 ± 13.1% and 93.7 ± 8.9%, respectively. There were no significant differences in TOF ratios between the SMS and lower stimulation intensities. However, 30% and 50% SMS showed significantly higher rates of the unmeasurable results of tests in the PACU. In terms of the stimulation pain, NRS showed a downward pattern as the current decreased and was significantly lower at 50% and 30% SMS than the NRS at SMS.
CONCLUSION: The TOF test with submaximal stimulation is still reliable and can reduce stimulation pain. Considering the importance of the TOF results in determining extubation, the authors suggest the minimal current for the TOF test as 70% SMS.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electromyography; General anesthesia; Neuromuscular blockade; Neuromuscular monitoring; Submaximal stimulus; Supramaximal stimulus

Year:  2022        PMID: 36264451     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-022-00920-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   1.977


  9 in total

1.  Normalization of the acceleromyographic train-of-four fade ratio.

Authors:  A F Kopman
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.105

2.  Normalization of acceleromyographic train-of-four ratio by baseline value for detecting residual neuromuscular block.

Authors:  T Suzuki; N Fukano; O Kitajima; S Saeki; S Ogawa
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Incidence and duration of residual paralysis at the end of surgery after multiple administrations of cisatracurium and rocuronium.

Authors:  D M Maybauer; G Geldner; M Blobner; F Pühringer; R Hofmockel; C Rex; H F Wulf; L Eberhart; C Arndt; M Eikermann
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision.

Authors:  T Fuchs-Buder; C Claudius; L T Skovgaard; L I Eriksson; R K Mirakhur; J Viby-Mogensen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.105

5.  Is the performance of acceleromyography improved with preload and normalization? A comparison with mechanomyography.

Authors:  Casper Claudius; Lene Theil Skovgaard; Jørgen Viby-Mogensen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Counting train-of-four twitch response: comparison of palpation to mechanomyography, acceleromyography, and electromyography.

Authors:  Andrew Bowdle; Logan Bussey; Kelly Michaelsen; Srdjan Jelacic; Bala Nair; Kei Togashi; Justin Hulvershorn
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Stimulation with submaximal current for train-of-four monitoring.

Authors:  S J Brull; J Ehrenwerth; D G Silverman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Optimal stimulating current for train-of-four stimulation in conscious subjects.

Authors:  Y Saitoh; K Nakazawa; H Toyooka; K Amaha
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Reference Standards for Nerve Conduction Studies of Individual Nerves of Lower Extremity With Expanded Uncertainty in Healthy Korean Adults.

Authors:  Jae Yoon Kim; Eunkyung Kim; Hyung Seok Shim; Jae Hyun Lee; Goo Joo Lee; Keewon Kim; Jae-Young Lim; Jaewon Beom; Sang Yoon Lee; Shi-Uk Lee; Sun Gun Chung; Byung-Mo Oh
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-02-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.