Literature DB >> 8590510

Optimal stimulating current for train-of-four stimulation in conscious subjects.

Y Saitoh1, K Nakazawa, H Toyooka, K Amaha.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal stimulating current for train-of-four (TOF) monitoring with regard to the return of TOF response and the discomfort associated with TOF. Two variables were examined at 60, 50, 40, 30, and 20 mA: (1) times from administration of vecuronium 80 micrograms.kg-1 to returns of responses to TOF determined accelographically in 75 anaesthetised patients and (2) discomfort associated with TOF in 15 awake volunteers using visual analogue scale (VAS). Times to return of the first response to stimulation at 60, 50, 40, and 30 mA were not different (29.1 +/- 11.2, 30.1 +/- 12.0, 31.9 +/- 12.6, and 35.4 +/- 14.2 min, respectively, mean +/- SD). However, time to the return of the first response elicited at 20 mA (53.7 +/- 21.6) was longer than at higher currents (P < 0.05). Similarly, with regard to the second, third, and fourth responses, the time to the return at 20 mA was longer than at the other currents (P < 0.05). The VAS associated with TOF at 60, 50, 40, 30, and 20 mA were 7.3 +/- 1.9, 6.7 +/- 1.8, 6.0 +/- 2.0, 4.1 +/- 2.1, and 2.7 +/- 2.3, respectively. The VAS at 30 mA was less than at 60 and 50 mA (P < 0.05), and at 20 mA was less than at 60, 50, and 40 mA (P < 0.05). In conclusion it is suggested that, when testing conscious patients, 30 mA is the optimal stimulating current for TOF monitoring because it represents the best compromise of neuromuscular monitoring and patient discomfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8590510     DOI: 10.1007/BF03011071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  14 in total

1.  Accelographic train-of-four at near-threshold currents.

Authors:  D G Silverman; N R Connelly; T Z O'Connor; R Garcia; S J Brull
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  The acceleration transducer--an assessment of its precision in comparison with a force displacement transducer.

Authors:  O May; H Kirkegaard Nielsen; M U Werner
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.105

3.  The relationship of evoked electromyographic and mechanical responses following atracurium in humans.

Authors:  A F Kopman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Burns of the skin caused by a peripheral-nerve stimulator.

Authors:  M Lippmann; W A Fields
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Measurement of acceleration: a new method of monitoring neuromuscular function.

Authors:  J Viby-Mogensen; E Jensen; M Werner; H K Nielsen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.105

Review 6.  Clinical assessment of neuromuscular transmission.

Authors:  J Viby-Mogensen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Milliamperage requirements for supramaximal stimulation of the ulnar nerve with surface electrodes.

Authors:  A F Kopman; D Lawson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Correlation of train-of-four and double burst stimulation ratios at varying amperages.

Authors:  S J Brull; N R Connelly; D G Silverman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Subjective responses to train-of-four and double burst stimulation in awake patients.

Authors:  N R Connelly; D G Silverman; T Z O'Connor; S J Brull
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Stimulation with submaximal current for train-of-four monitoring.

Authors:  S J Brull; J Ehrenwerth; D G Silverman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  2 in total

1.  Monitoring of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block at the sternocleidomastoid muscle in anesthetized patients.

Authors:  Yuhji Saitoh; Tsutomu Oshima; Yoshinori Nakata
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Reliability of submaximal stimulation for the train-of-four test using acceleromyography and electromyography with individualized stimulation currents.

Authors:  Gi Year Lee; Sooyoung Cho; Hee Jung Baik; Jong Wha Lee; Jae Hee Woo; Hyun Jung Lee; Seung Hee Yoo
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 1.977

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.