Literature DB >> 36262668

Evaluating the Functional and Psychological Outcomes Following Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Rifat Islam1, Brent Lanting2, Lyndsay Somerville2, Susan W Hunter1,3.   

Abstract

Background: A fall after total hip arthroplasty (THA) that results in a periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPF) can have devastating functional and psychological consequences in older adults. There are few studies that have evaluated both functional and psychological outcomes of PPF post-THA in the same cohort.
Methods: This is a retrospective study of 130 people who underwent revision THA between 2005 and 2019 due to PPF. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Short Form-12 (SF-12) assessed physical function, hip joint function, and psychological well-being, respectively. Descriptive statistics using means and standard deviation or frequencies and percentages were used to define the sample. The association between baseline demographic, clinical, and surgical factors on WOMAC, HHS, and SF-12 scores at 1-year post-PPF surgery was modelled using multivariable linear regression. The mean age (n = 130) was 80.6 ± 9.0 years, and 55.4% (n = 72) were female. The mortality rate was 15.4% (n = 20) at 1-year post-PPF surgery. One-year follow-up data were available for 35.4% (n = 46) of patients.
Results: The WOMAC (n = 37), HHS (n = 32), and SF-12 mental component summary (n = 46) scores at 1-year post-PPF surgery were 67.9 ± 20.3, 78.3 ± 15.0, and 52.7 ± 9.1, respectively. No significant association was found among age, gender, previous history of lower extremity surgery, Vancouver classification, and femoral bone grafting on WOMAC, HHS, and SF-12 scores. Conclusions: Our study found that patients with PPF have fair hip joint function, poor physical function and psychological well-being, and a high mortality rate at 1-year post-PPF surgery.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mortality rate; Older adults; Outcome; Periprosthetic femoral fracture; Total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2022        PMID: 36262668      PMCID: PMC9574344          DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroplast Today        ISSN: 2352-3441


  26 in total

1.  Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement.

Authors:  J M Quintana; A Escobar; A Bilbao; I Arostegui; I Lafuente; I Vidaurreta
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Hans Lindahl; Göran Garellick; Hans Regnér; Peter Herberts; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  The ASA Physical Status Classification: inter-observer consistency. American Society of Anesthesiologists.

Authors:  P H K Mak; R C H Campbell; M G Irwin
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.669

4.  Survivorship After Periprosthetic Femur Fracture: Factors Affecting Outcome.

Authors:  Jacob M Drew; William L Griffin; Susan M Odum; Bryce Van Doren; Brock T Weston; Louis S Stryker
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  High incidence of complications and poor clinical outcome in the operative treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: An analysis of 71 cases.

Authors:  R G Zuurmond; W van Wijhe; J J A M van Raay; S K Bulstra
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Could Patient Undergwent Surgical Treatment for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture after Hip Arthroplasty Return to Their Status before Trauma?

Authors:  Long Zheng; Woo-Yong Lee; Deuk-Soo Hwang; Chan Kang; Chang-Kyun Noh
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-06-30

7.  Surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty: our institutional experience.

Authors:  Plamen Kinov; Gershon Volpin; Roger Sevi; Panayot P Tanchev; Boris Antonov; Geries Hakim
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  A systematic review of estimates of the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index in patients who underwent total hip and total knee replacement.

Authors:  C MacKay; N Clements; R Wong; A M Davis
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur.

Authors:  Timothy Bhattacharyya; Denis Chang; James B Meigs; Daniel M Estok; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The Reliability and Validity of Short Form-12 Health Survey Version 2 for Chinese Older Adults.

Authors:  Shu-Wen Su; Dong Wang
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.