Literature DB >> 20236641

High incidence of complications and poor clinical outcome in the operative treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: An analysis of 71 cases.

R G Zuurmond1, W van Wijhe, J J A M van Raay, S K Bulstra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this observational study was to determine the clinical results of the operative treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures over a long period of time.
METHODS: The medical records of patients treated between 1993 and 2006 for a periprosthetic femoral fracture were obtained after a survey in two major hospitals. Radiographic evaluation was performed according to the Vancouver classification. All patients were contacted to fill out the Oxford hip score.
RESULTS: A total of 80 PPFs were identified in 79 patients. For 71 patients with 71 fractures, medical records and radiographs were available. The mean age at the time of fracture was 73.4 years (range: 38-95 years). The mean interval between initial arthroplasty and the time of fracture was 6.3 years. As many as 44 fractures occurred in patients with primary hip arthroplasty (62%) and 27 fractures in patients with revision implants (38%). All but two patients were treated operatively and 34 patients (48%) suffered from a complication, leading to a re-operation in 22 cases (33%). The most frequent indication for re-operation was re-fracture or implant failure. Vancouver type-C fractures lead to re-operations in 52% of the cases (11 of 20). A total of 36 patients (51%) were able to complete an Oxford hip score after a mean period of 64.9 months (range: 16-157 months). The other patients were lost to follow-up (45% were deceased and 4% were mentally impaired). The mean Oxford hip score was 27.8 (range: 12-57) and was significantly higher in patients suffering from a complication (p=0.02) and in patients with a periprosthetic fracture (PPF) after revision surgery (p=0.02).
CONCLUSION: The treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures has a high complication rate and a large number of re-operations occur. The long-term clinical results are compromised by the event of a complication. The clinical results of treated fractures after a primary arthroplasty were better than after multiple arthroplasty procedures. Particularly, Vancouver type-C fractures showed high complication rates. This high complication rate should be taken into account for future studies in PPFs. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20236641     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.01.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  35 in total

1.  Periprosthetic joint infection is the main reason for failure in patients following periprosthetic fracture treated with revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Janna van den Kieboom; Venkatsaiakhil Tirumala; Liang Xiong; Christian Klemt; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: a retrospective study with functional and radiological outcomes from 2010 to 2016.

Authors:  Gaetano Caruso; Lorenzo Milani; Tedi Marko; Vincenzo Lorusso; Mattia Andreotti; Leo Massari
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-11-25

3.  Primary cementless hip arthroplasty as a potential risk factor for non-union after long-stem revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Sandra Boesmueller; Marc Michel; Marcus Hofbauer; Patrick Platzer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Femoral cortical thickness influences the pattern of proximal femoral periprosthetic fractures with a cemented stem.

Authors:  Jarrad Stevens; Nicholas Clement; Michael Nasserallah; Michael Millar; Sam Joseph
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-08

Review 5.  Extended trochanteric osteotomy: current concepts review.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Gopinath Duraisamy; Jayadev Chandrasekharan; Varatharaj Mounasamy
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-02-29

6.  Outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip replacement treated with polyaxial locking plate.

Authors:  M F Hoffmann; S Lotzien; T A Schildhauer
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-09-06

7.  Adequate surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty does not correlate with functional outcome and quality of life.

Authors:  Sven Märdian; Klaus-Dieter Schaser; Johanna Gruner; Franziska Scheel; Carsten Perka; Philipp Schwabe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Outcomes following surgical treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures: a single centre series.

Authors:  Natasha Holder; Steve Papp; Wade Gofton; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 9.  Principles of managing Vancouver type B periprosthetic fractures around cemented polished tapered femoral stems.

Authors:  Conal Quah; Matthew Porteous; Arthur Stephen
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-11-26

10.  Bicortical screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability but devastating failure modes in periprosthetic femur fracture care using locking plates.

Authors:  Clemens Gwinner; Sven Märdian; Tobias Dröge; Martin Schulze; Michael J Raschke; Richard Stange
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.