Literature DB >> 36262463

Design, development, and face validation of an intubation simulation device using real-time force data feedback.

Gopikrishna M Rao1, Vishwanatha M Rao2, Jeremy Juang3, Justin Benoit3, Allen L Feng4, Phillip C Song4.   

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a novel laryngoscope device capable of dynamically measuring force and torque measurements in real-time during intubation and to explore the efficacy of such a device through a face validation simulation.
Methods: The torque sensor laryngoscope is designed for use during intubation and is modeled after a standard, single-use plastic laryngoscope. After device calibration, a face validation study was performed with intubation experts in the field. Quantitative data (intubation force metrics) and qualitative data (expert feedback on the device) were collected from three intubations using a Mac blade and three intubations with the Miller blade.
Results: Three experts (two anesthesiologists and one otolaryngologist) participated in the study. The mean maximum force exerted with the Mac blade was 24.5 N (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.3-26.8). The average force exerted was 13.6 N (95% CI, 11.7-15.5). The average total suspension time was 13.1 s (95% CI, 10.4-15.8). The average total impulse was 164.6 N·s (95% CI, 147.9-181.4). The mean maximum force exerted with the Miller blade was 31.6 N (95% CI, 26.4-36.8). The average force exerted was 15.8 N (95% CI, 13.8-17.9). The average total suspension time was 11.3 s (95% CI, 9.9-12.6). The average total impulse was 216.2 N·s (95% CI, 186.5-245.9). The mean maximum force (p = .0265) and total impulse (p = .009) were significantly higher in the Miller blade trials than in the Mac blade trials. Survey results found that this device, while bulky, intubated similarly to standard-use models and has potential as an intubation teaching tool.
Conclusion: The torque sensor laryngoscope can measure and display real-time intubation force metrics for multiple laryngoscope blades. Initial validation studies showed a significantly lower maximum force and total impulse when intubating with the Mac blade than with the Miller blade. Face validation survey results were positive and suggested the potential for this device as a teaching tool. Level of Evidence: Level 5.
© 2022 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  airway simulation; biomechanical analysis; device design; endotracheal intubation; face validation; laryngoscope; torque sensor

Year:  2022        PMID: 36262463      PMCID: PMC9575137          DOI: 10.1002/lio2.916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol        ISSN: 2378-8038


  12 in total

1.  Measurement of forces during laryngoscopy.

Authors:  M J Bucx; P A Scheck; R T Van Geel; A H Den Ouden; R Niesing
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Force and pressure distribution using Macintosh and GlideScope laryngoscopes in normal and difficult airways: a manikin study.

Authors:  M Carassiti; R Zanzonico; S Cecchini; S Silvestri; R Cataldo; F E Agrò
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 3.  Complications of emergency tracheal intubation: immediate airway-related consequences: part II.

Authors:  Thomas C Mort
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.510

4.  An active simulator for neonatal intubation: Design, development and assessment.

Authors:  Ilaria Baldoli; Selene Tognarelli; Ferdinando Vangi; Davide Panizza; Rosa T Scaramuzzo; Armando Cuttano; Cecilia Laschi; Arianna Menciassi
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  A new device for measuring and recording the forces applied during laryngoscopy.

Authors:  E P McCoy; B A Austin; R K Mirakhur; K C Wong
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Force, torque, and stress relaxation with direct laryngoscopy.

Authors:  R H Hastings; E D Hon; C Nghiem; E A Wahrenbrock
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Laryngeal Force Sensor for Suspension Microlaryngoscopy: A Prospective Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Allen L Feng; Elefteria Puka; Alex Ciaramella; Vishwanatha M Rao; Tiffany V Wang; Matthew R Naunheim; Phillip C Song
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Tongue paresthesia and dysgeusia following operative microlaryngoscopy.

Authors:  Belachew Tessema; Lucian Sulica; Guo-Pei Yu; Roy B Sessions
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Laryngeal force sensor metrics are predictive of increased perioperative narcotic requirements.

Authors:  Allen L Feng; Alex Ciaramella; Matthew R Naunheim; Shekhar K Gadkaree; Iuliu Fat; Phillip C Song
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 10.  Simulation technology for skills training and competency assessment in medical education.

Authors:  Ross J Scalese; Vivian T Obeso; S Barry Issenberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.