Literature DB >> 1519691

Measurement of forces during laryngoscopy.

M J Bucx1, P A Scheck, R T Van Geel, A H Den Ouden, R Niesing.   

Abstract

The forces transmitted by the laryngoscope blade onto the base of the tongue are assumed to be a major cardiovascular stimulus. This study investigates the various forces applied onto a Macintosh laryngoscope during laryngoscopy. The forces acting along the axis of the handle are described, as well as the forces exerted by the anaesthetist to prevent the laryngoscope from turning. Based on a relatively simple technique, a modified laryngoscope has been designed to measure these forces. Four different laryngoscopic parameters are determined: (1) the duration of laryngoscopy, (2) the maximally applied force, (3) the mean force and (4) the integral of the force over the time (area under the curve). The force measurements of 49 anatomically normal patients undergoing uncomplicated intubation are included in the study. The duration of laryngoscopy was 16.3s (SD 11.8), the applied peak force was 35N (SD 12) and mean force necessary was 20N (SD 6) while the force-time integral was 324N (SD 194).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1519691     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02180.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  11 in total

1.  Transverse forces exerted on the maxillary incisors during laryngoscopy.

Authors:  M J Bucx; M H van der Vegt; C J Snijders; T Stijnen; P R Wesselink
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Comparison of the effects of various airway devices on hemodynamic response and QTc interval in rabbits under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Huseyin Toman; Mesut Erbas; Hasan Sahin; Hasan Ali Kiraz; Metehan Uzun; Mehmet Akif Ovali
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Does experience influence the forces exerted on maxillary incisors during laryngoscopy? A manikin study using the Macintosh laryngoscope.

Authors:  M J Bucx; R T van Geel; J T Wegener; C Robers; T Stijnen
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Tracheal intubation using the Airtraq video laryngoscope vs. Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with anticipated difficult intubation.

Authors:  Nipun Gupta; Shalendra Singh; Sachin Shouche; Satish Kumar Mishra
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2020-05-12

5.  Design, development, and face validation of an intubation simulation device using real-time force data feedback.

Authors:  Gopikrishna M Rao; Vishwanatha M Rao; Jeremy Juang; Justin Benoit; Allen L Feng; Phillip C Song
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-09-15

Review 6.  Evolution of videolaryngoscopy in pediatric population.

Authors:  Anju Gupta; Ridhima Sharma; Nishkarsh Gupta
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-10

7.  Better Hemodynamic Profile of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Compared to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation.

Authors:  Hashem Jarineshin; Saeed Kashani; Majid Vatankhah; Alireza Abdulahzade Baghaee; Sahar Sattari; Fereydoon Fekrat
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 0.611

8.  Intubating condition, hemodynamic parameters and upper airway morbidity: A comparison of intubating laryngeal mask airway with standard direct laryngoscopy.

Authors:  J Kavitha; Debendra Kumar Tripathy; Sandeep Kumar Mishra; Gayatri Mishra; L J Chandrasekhar; P Ezhilarasu
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2011 Jan-Jun

9.  Previsional space during direct laryngoscopy: Implication in the difficult laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Seongjoo Park; Ji-Won Han; Sukwon Cha; Sung-Hee Han; Jin-Hee Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Videolaryngoscopy.

Authors:  Rv Chemsian; S Bhananker; R Ramaiah
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.