Literature DB >> 36261615

Fabrication of 3D printed head phantom using plaster mixed with polylactic acid powder for patient-specific QA in intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Sung Yeop Kim1, Jae Won Park2,3, Jaehyeon Park2,3, Ji Woon Yea2,3, Se An Oh4,5.   

Abstract

This study aimed to fabricate a heterogeneous phantom replicating the commercial Rando phantom by mixing plaster powder and polylactic acid (PLA) powder. Producing a heterogeneous phantom using Plaster and PLA is cheaper because it can be easily obtained in the commercial market. Additionally, patient-specific Quality Assurance can be easily performed because the phantom can be produced based on the patient's CT image. PLA has been well studied in the field of radiation therapy and was found to be safe and effective. To match the mean Hounsfield unit (HU) values of the Rando phantom, the bone tissue was changed using plaster and 0-35% PLA powder until an appropriate HU value was obtained, and soft tissue was changed using the PLA infill value until an appropriate HU value was obtained. Bone tissue (200 HU or higher), soft issue (- 500 to 200 HU), and air cavity (less than - 500 HU) were modeled based on the HU values on the computed tomography (CT) image. The bone tissue was modeled as a cavity, and after three-dimensional (3D) printing, a solution containing a mixture of plaster and PLA powder was poured. To evaluate the bone implementation of the phantom obtained by the mixture of plaster and PLA powder, the HU profile of the CT images of the 3D-printed phantom using only PLA and the Rando phantom printed using only PLA was evaluated. The mean HU value for soft tissue in the Rando phantom (- 22.5 HU) showed the greatest similarity to the result obtained with an infill value of 82% (- 20 HU). The mean HU value for bone tissue (669 HU) showed the greatest similarity to the value obtained with 15% PLA powder (680 HU). Thus, for the phantom composed of plaster mixed with PLA powder, soft tissue was fabricated using a 3D printer with an infill value of 82%, and bone tissue was fabricated with a mixture containing 15% PLA powder. In the HU profile, this phantom showed a mean difference of 61 HU for soft tissue and 109 HU for bone tissue in comparison with the Rando phantom. The ratio of PLA powder and plaster can be adjusted to achieve an HU value similar to bone tissue. A simple combination of PLA powder and plaster enabled the creation of a custom phantom that showed similarities to the Rando phantom in both soft tissue and bone tissue.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36261615      PMCID: PMC9581964          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22520-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  12 in total

1.  Characterizing 3D printing in the fabrication of variable density phantoms for quality assurance of radiotherapy.

Authors:  Joseph Madamesila; Philip McGeachy; J Eduardo Villarreal Barajas; Rao Khan
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.685

2.  Construction and validation of a low cost paediatric pelvis phantom.

Authors:  Ali Mohammed Ali; Peter Hogg; Safora Johansen; Andrew England
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  A new head phantom with realistic shape and spatially varying skull resistivity distribution.

Authors:  Jian-Bo Li; Chi Tang; Meng Dai; Geng Liu; Xue-Tao Shi; Bin Yang; Can-Hua Xu; Feng Fu; Fu-Sheng You; Meng-Xing Tang; Xiu-Zhen Dong
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Evaluation of a 3D-printed heterogeneous anthropomorphic head and neck phantom for patient-specific quality assurance in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Noriyuki Kadoya; Kota Abe; Hikaru Nemoto; Kiyokazu Sato; Yoshiro Ieko; Kengo Ito; Suguru Dobashi; Ken Takeda; Keiichi Jingu
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2019-07-30

5.  IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119.

Authors:  Gary A Ezzell; Jay W Burmeister; Nesrin Dogan; Thomas J LoSasso; James G Mechalakos; Dimitris Mihailidis; Andrea Molineu; Jatinder R Palta; Chester R Ramsey; Bill J Salter; Jie Shi; Ping Xia; Ning J Yue; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Three-dimensional printer-generated patient-specific phantom for artificial in vivo dosimetry in radiotherapy quality assurance.

Authors:  Takeshi Kamomae; Hidetoshi Shimizu; Takayoshi Nakaya; Kuniyasu Okudaira; Takahiro Aoyama; Hiroshi Oguchi; Masataka Komori; Mariko Kawamura; Kazuhiro Ohtakara; Hajime Monzen; Yoshiyuki Itoh; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  Refinement of MLC modeling improves commercial QA dosimetry system for SRS and SBRT patient-specific QA.

Authors:  Yair Hillman; Josh Kim; Indrin Chetty; Ning Wen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Fabrication of malleable three-dimensional-printed customized bolus using three-dimensional scanner.

Authors:  Jae Won Park; Se An Oh; Ji Woon Yea; Min Kyu Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Potential of 3D printing technologies for fabrication of electron bolus and proton compensators.

Authors:  Wei Zou; Ted Fisher; Miao Zhang; Leonard Kim; Ting Chen; Venkat Narra; Beth Swann; Rachana Singh; Richard Siderit; Lingshu Yin; Boon-Keng Kevin Teo; Michael McKenna; James McDonough; Yue J Ning
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Feasibility of a 3D-printed anthropomorphic patient-specific head phantom for patient-specific quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ji Woon Yea; Jae Won Park; Sung Kyu Kim; Dong Youn Kim; Jae Gu Kim; Chan Young Seo; Won Hyo Jeong; Man Youl Jeong; Se An Oh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.