Jordan M Alpert1, Chelsea N Hampton2, Aantaki Raisa2, Merry Jennifer Markham3, Carma L Bylund4. 1. Center for Value-Based Care Research, Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. alpertj@ccf.org. 2. College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, 2093 Weimer Hall, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA. 3. Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 4. Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Patient-centered communication (PCC) in cancer care is helpful to nurture the patient-clinician relationship and respond to patients' emotions. However, it is unknown how PCC is incorporated into electronic patient-clinician communication. METHODS: In-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews with clinicians were conducted to understand how PCC was integrated into asynchronous communication between patients and clinicians; otherwise, known as secure messaging. The constant comparative method was used to develop a codebook and formulate themes. RESULTS: Twenty clinicians in medical and radiation oncology participated in audio-recorded interviews. Three main themes addressed how clinicians incorporate PCC within messages: (1) being mindful of the patient-clinician relationship, (2) encouraging participation and partnership, and (3) responding promptly suggests accessibility and approachability. Clinicians recommended that patients could craft more effective messages by being specific, expressing concern, needs, and directness, summarized by the acronym S.E.N.D. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians value secure messaging to connect with patients and demonstrate their accessibility. They acknowledge that secure messaging can influence the patient-clinician relationship and make efforts to include considerate and supportive language. As secure messaging is increasingly relied upon for patient-clinician communication, patients' message quality must improve to assist clinicians in being able to provide prompt responses inclusive of PCC.
PURPOSE: Patient-centered communication (PCC) in cancer care is helpful to nurture the patient-clinician relationship and respond to patients' emotions. However, it is unknown how PCC is incorporated into electronic patient-clinician communication. METHODS: In-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews with clinicians were conducted to understand how PCC was integrated into asynchronous communication between patients and clinicians; otherwise, known as secure messaging. The constant comparative method was used to develop a codebook and formulate themes. RESULTS: Twenty clinicians in medical and radiation oncology participated in audio-recorded interviews. Three main themes addressed how clinicians incorporate PCC within messages: (1) being mindful of the patient-clinician relationship, (2) encouraging participation and partnership, and (3) responding promptly suggests accessibility and approachability. Clinicians recommended that patients could craft more effective messages by being specific, expressing concern, needs, and directness, summarized by the acronym S.E.N.D. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians value secure messaging to connect with patients and demonstrate their accessibility. They acknowledge that secure messaging can influence the patient-clinician relationship and make efforts to include considerate and supportive language. As secure messaging is increasingly relied upon for patient-clinician communication, patients' message quality must improve to assist clinicians in being able to provide prompt responses inclusive of PCC.
Authors: Jordan M Alpert; Shu Wang; Carma L Bylund; Merry Jennifer Markham; Ragnhildur I Bjarnadottir; Ji-Hyun Lee; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Ramzi G Salloum Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2020-11-21
Authors: Jordan M Alpert; Gemme Campbell-Salome; Cayle Gao; Merry Jennifer Markham; Martina Murphy; Christopher A Harle; Samantha R Paige; Till Krenz; Carma L Bylund Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2021-11-11 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Carolyn L Turvey; Lindsey A Fuhrmeister; Dawn M Klein; Jane Moeckli; M Bryant Howren; Emily E Chasco Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 3.536