Carolyn L Turvey1,2,3, Lindsey A Fuhrmeister1, Dawn M Klein1,2,3,4, Jane Moeckli1,2, M Bryant Howren2,3,5,6, Emily E Chasco7. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 2. Office of Rural Health Resource Center, Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 3. Center for Access Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 4. J P Systems, Clifton, Virginia, USA. 5. Department of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, College of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA. 6. Florida Blue Center for Rural Health Research and Policy, College of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA. 7. Department of Internal Medicine, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Abstract
Objective: Electronic health record patient portals were promoted to enhance patient engagement. However, organizations often deny patient access to records of treatment for mental health disorders. This study explores patient and provider experience of patient electronic access to the mental health treatment record and the use of secure messaging. Materials and Methods: Online surveys of a sample of mental health patients (N = 168) and providers (N = 80) addressed their experience using patient portals and secure messaging. Results: Only 29 of the 80 providers (36%) worked at organizations which provided patients electronic access to mental health records. Of these 29 providers, 72% endorsed that patients requested a change in the provider note, 69% endorsed patients asked more questions, 55% endorsed patients reported they experienced significant distress after accessing portal, and 21% reported patients engaged in negative and/or self-destructive behavior toward themselves or others. Of patients with access to mental health notes (N = 37), 86% endorsed that they gained a better understanding of what was discussed in the appointment, 84% trusted their health care provider more, 76% felt comforted or relieved after reading their health information, and 57% reported they were better able to take medications as prescribed. Both patients and providers enjoyed the efficiency of secure messaging. Open-text responses are also presented. Conclusions: The implementation of electronic access to mental health notes requires a transition from viewing the medical record as the exclusive tool of providers to that of a collaborative tool for patients and providers to achieve treatment goals.
Objective: Electronic health record patient portals were promoted to enhance patient engagement. However, organizations often deny patient access to records of treatment for mental health disorders. This study explores patient and provider experience of patient electronic access to the mental health treatment record and the use of secure messaging. Materials and Methods: Online surveys of a sample of mental health patients (N = 168) and providers (N = 80) addressed their experience using patient portals and secure messaging. Results: Only 29 of the 80 providers (36%) worked at organizations which provided patients electronic access to mental health records. Of these 29 providers, 72% endorsed that patients requested a change in the provider note, 69% endorsed patients asked more questions, 55% endorsed patients reported they experienced significant distress after accessing portal, and 21% reported patients engaged in negative and/or self-destructive behavior toward themselves or others. Of patients with access to mental health notes (N = 37), 86% endorsed that they gained a better understanding of what was discussed in the appointment, 84% trusted their health care provider more, 76% felt comforted or relieved after reading their health information, and 57% reported they were better able to take medications as prescribed. Both patients and providers enjoyed the efficiency of secure messaging. Open-text responses are also presented. Conclusions: The implementation of electronic access to mental health notes requires a transition from viewing the medical record as the exclusive tool of providers to that of a collaborative tool for patients and providers to achieve treatment goals.
Entities:
Keywords:
electronic health records; mental health; patient engagement; patient portals; personal health records; secure messaging; telehealth; telemedicine
Authors: Carolyn L Turvey; Dawn M Klein; Matthew Witry; J Stacey Klutts; Elaine L Hill; Bruce Alexander; Kim M Nazi Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Tom Delbanco; Jan Walker; Sigall K Bell; Jonathan D Darer; Joann G Elmore; Nadine Farag; Henry J Feldman; Roanne Mejilla; Long Ngo; James D Ralston; Stephen E Ross; Neha Trivedi; Elisabeth Vodicka; Suzanne G Leveille Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jennifer L Wolff; Jonathan D Darer; Andrea Berger; Deserae Clarke; Jamie A Green; Rebecca A Stametz; Tom Delbanco; Jan Walker Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Carolyn Turvey; Dawn Klein; Gemmae Fix; Timothy P Hogan; Susan Woods; Steven R Simon; Mary Charlton; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin; Donna M Zulman; Lilian Dindo; Bonnie Wakefield; Gail Graham; Kim Nazi Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Steven K Dobscha; Lauren M Denneson; Maura K Pisciotta; Donald S Bourne; Jason I Chen; David Philipps-Moses; Susan S Woods Journal: JAMIA Open Date: 2018-04-25
Authors: Lauren M Denneson; Jason I Chen; Maura Pisciotta; Anais Tuepker; Steven K Dobscha Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Jordan M Alpert; Chelsea N Hampton; Aantaki Raisa; Merry Jennifer Markham; Carma L Bylund Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-10-19 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Julianne E Brady; Amy M Linsky; Steven R Simon; Kate Yeksigian; Amy Rubin; Alan J Zillich; Alissa L Russ-Jara Journal: JMIR Hum Factors Date: 2022-08-03