Cheryl Rathert1, Jessica N Mittler2, Sudeep Banerjee3, Jennifer McDaniel4. 1. Department of Health Administration, 1008 East Clay St. P.O. Box 980203, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0203, United States. Electronic address: crathert@vcu.edu. 2. Department of Health Administration, 1008 East Clay St. P.O. Box 980203, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0203, United States. Electronic address: jnmittler@vcu.edu. 3. Department of Health Administration, 1008 East Clay St. P.O. Box 980203, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0203, United States. Electronic address: banerjees3@mymail.vcu.edu. 4. Tompkins-McCaw Library for the Health Sciences, 509 North 12th Street, P.O. Box 980582, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0582, United States. Electronic address: jamcdaniel@vcu.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Patient-physician communication is essential for patient-centered health care. Physicians are concerned that electronic health records (EHRs) negatively affect communication with patients. This study identified a framework for understanding communication functions that influence patient outcomes. We then conducted a systematic review of the literature and organized it within the framework to better understand what is known. METHOD: A comprehensive search of three databases (CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO) yielded 41 articles for analysis. RESULTS: Results indicated that EHR use improves capture and sharing of certain biomedical information. However, it may interfere with collection of psychosocial and emotional information, and therefore may interfere with development of supportive, healing relationships. Patient access to the EHR and messaging functions may improve communication, patient empowerment, engagement, and self-management. CONCLUSION: More rigorous examination of EHR impacts on communication functions and their influences on patient outcomes is imperative for achieving patient-centered care. By focusing on the role of communication functions on patient outcomes, future EHRs can be developed to facilitate care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Training alone is likely to be insufficient to address disruptions to communication processes. Processes must be improved, and EHRs must be developed to capture useful data without interfering with physicians' and patients' abilities to effectively communicate.
OBJECTIVE:Patient-physician communication is essential for patient-centered health care. Physicians are concerned that electronic health records (EHRs) negatively affect communication with patients. This study identified a framework for understanding communication functions that influence patient outcomes. We then conducted a systematic review of the literature and organized it within the framework to better understand what is known. METHOD: A comprehensive search of three databases (CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO) yielded 41 articles for analysis. RESULTS: Results indicated that EHR use improves capture and sharing of certain biomedical information. However, it may interfere with collection of psychosocial and emotional information, and therefore may interfere with development of supportive, healing relationships. Patient access to the EHR and messaging functions may improve communication, patient empowerment, engagement, and self-management. CONCLUSION: More rigorous examination of EHR impacts on communication functions and their influences on patient outcomes is imperative for achieving patient-centered care. By focusing on the role of communication functions on patient outcomes, future EHRs can be developed to facilitate care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Training alone is likely to be insufficient to address disruptions to communication processes. Processes must be improved, and EHRs must be developed to capture useful data without interfering with physicians' and patients' abilities to effectively communicate.
Authors: Richard L Street; Lin Liu; Neil J Farber; Yunan Chen; Alan Calvitti; Nadir Weibel; Mark T Gabuzda; Kristin Bell; Barbara Gray; Steven Rick; Shazia Ashfaq; Zia Agha Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Consuela C Yousef; Teresa M Salgado; Ali Farooq; Keisha Burnett; Laura E McClelland; Laila C Abu Esba; Hani S Alhamdan; Sahal Khoshhal; Ibrahim Aldossary; Omar A Alyas; Jonathan P DeShazo Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Jordan M Alpert; Chelsea N Hampton; Aantaki Raisa; Merry Jennifer Markham; Carma L Bylund Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-10-19 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Ronald Dendere; Christine Slade; Andrew Burton-Jones; Clair Sullivan; Andrew Staib; Monika Janda Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Lindsay Elizabeth Litwin; Christina Maly; Asma Ramadan Khamis; Cyndi Hiner; Jérémie Zoungrana; Khadija Mohamed; Mary Drake; Michael Machaku; Mustafa Njozi; Salhiya Ali Muhsin; Yusuph K Kulindwa; Patricia P Gomez Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 3.007