Literature DB >> 36253858

Global prevalence of congenital anencephaly: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nader Salari1, Behnaz Fatahi2, Reza Fatahian3, Payam Mohammadi4, Adibeh Rahmani5, Niloofar Darvishi2, Mona Keivan6, Shamarina Shohaimi7, Masoud Mohammadi8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anencephaly is a fatal congenital anomaly characterized by the absence of brain hemispheres and cranial arch. Timely preventive measures can be taken by knowing the exact prevalence of this common neural tube defect; thus, carried out through systematic review and meta-analysis, the present study was conducted to determine the worldwide prevalence, incidence and mortality of anencephaly.
METHODS: Cochran's seven-step instructions were used as the guideline. Having determined the research question and inclusion and exclusion criteria, we studied MagIran, SID, Science Direct, WoS, Web of Science, Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Moreover, the search strategy in each database included using all possible keyword combinations with the help of "AND" and "OR" operators with no time limit to 2021. The I2 test was used to calculate study heterogeneity, and Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation tests were employed to assess the publication bias. Data were analyzed by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (Version 2).
RESULTS: In this study, the statements of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) were used. In the first stage, 1141 articles were found, of which 330 duplicate studies were omitted. 371 articles were deleted based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria by reviewing the title and abstract of the study. 58 articles were removed by reviewing the full text of the article because it was not relevant to the research. 360 studies with a sample size of 207,639,132 people were considered for the meta-analysis. Overall estimate of the prevalence, incidence and attenuation of anencephaly worldwide were 5.1 per ten thousand births (95% confidence interval 4.7-5.5 per ten thousand births), 8.3 per ten thousand births (95% confidence interval 5.5-9.9 per ten thousand births), 5.5 per ten thousand births (95% confidence interval 1.8-15 per ten thousand births) respectively the highest of which according to the subgroup analysis, belonged to the Australian continent with 8.6 per ten thousand births (95% confidence interval 7.7-9.5 per ten thousand births).
CONCLUSION: The overall prevalence of anencephaly in the world is significant, indicating the urgent need for preventive and treating measures.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anencephaly; Neural tube defects; Prevalence; Systematic review and meta-analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36253858      PMCID: PMC9575217          DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01509-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health        ISSN: 1742-4755            Impact factor:   3.355


Background

Neural Tube Defects (NTDs) are considered the most common congenital anomalies of the central nervous system (CNS) [1], and the second most serious ones after inborn heart defects [2]. Non-spontaneous neural tube closure between the 3rd and 4th weeks of intrauterine growth is considered as the leading cause of this defect [1]. Regarding the etiology of these defects, most cases are attributed to the interaction between different genes and environmental factors, known as a multifactorial inheritance [3]. Studies indicate that immediate family members are more at risk compared to others; in other words, if a child is born with NTD, the risk of recurrence in future pregnancies is between 25 and 50 times higher than in general cases [4, 5, 6]. Moreover, diabetes mellitus, using valproic acid to treat epilepsy during pregnancy, obesity, zinc deficiency, hyperthermia, and folate deficiency are all predisposing factors for neural tube defects [7, 8]. Though being significantly various in different geographical areas, the incidence of NTD is generally around 1 in 1000 live births or (NTD affects about 1 in 1000 live births on average, however this varies greatly by area.) [4, 9]. Pathologically, neural tube defects vary from a small, uncomplicated opening in the posterior canal of the vertebrae to the failure of the entire neural tube to close, leading to the most severe type of defect that is craniorachischisis [10]. The most recurring cases include anencephaly, spina bifida, and encephalocele [10]. Anencephaly is a fatal congenital malformation characterized by the absence of hemispheres of the brain and cranial arch [11]. Anencephaly is the most common CNS disorder in the Western world, occurring 37 times more frequently in women than men [12]. Babies born with such defects generally die at birth or shortly thereafter while newborns with spina bifida and encephalocele require special medical care and surgery to survive [13]. Prevalence of anencephaly mortality (100%), compared to Spina bifida (7%) and encephalocele (46%), is significantly higher [14]; thus, anencephaly is considered as a taxing burden on public health worldwide that may lead to significant human resources loss [15]. Frog-like appearance, short neck, bulging eyes, and large tongue are characteristic features of infants with anencephaly [16]. About 12% of cases of anencephaly are associated with other structural abnormalities [17], including Cleft lip, cleft palate, clubfoot and omphalocele (Anencephaly is linked to additional structural abnormalities in around 12% of cases [17], such as cleft lip, cleft palate, clubfoot, and omphalocele) [16]. Anencephaly was the first congenital anomaly to be detected by ultrasound, and it can be diagnosed at weeks 12–13 of pregnancy while preventive measures include controlling known risk factors and offering medical counseling to couples about termination of pregnancy [16]. Previous studies have demonstrated that anencephaly is a multifactorial process that is controlled by genes and numerous other environmental factors. However, recent studies reveal that folic acid supply before and in the early stages of pregnancy (1 to 3 months before pregnancy and up to 12 weeks of gestation) can dramatically prevent anencephaly and reduce its prevalence by 50–70% [18]. The U.S. Public Health Service and the Food and Nutrition Council of the Institute of Medicine, along with the National Research Council, recommend that all women of childbearing potential can take 0.4 mg of folic acid daily to reduce the risk of developing neural tube defects [19, 20]. Annually, about 300,000 babies are born with neural tube defects, resulting in 88,000 deaths and 8.6 million lifelong disabilities [21]. The occurrence of anencephaly varies over time and geographically. For instance, the prevalence of this defect in northern Iran in 1998–2005 was estimated at 12 per 10,000 births [22] while In Texas, the United States, 2.81 per 10,000 births during 1999–2003 were reported [23]. The prevalence of anencephaly based on data collected from (EUROCAT) member countries during the years 2000 and 2010, was estimated at 3.52 per 10,000 births [24]. Considering the importance of anencephaly as the most severe type of neural tube defect, and its detrimental effects on the quantity and quality of patients’ and parents’ life, and regarding the serious health, psychological, social and economic costs for the individual and society, accurate identification of patients is of great importance to organize health care services and implement preventive measures. In addition, because of various statistics on the prevalence of anencephaly and the worldwide absence of a comprehensive investigation capable of analyzing the outcomes of these studies, the present research was conducted through a systematic review and meta-analysis to shed light on the prevalence, incidence and mortality of anencephaly worldwide.

Methods

The present systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on the Cochrane 7-step approach, including: research question selection, inclusion and exclusion criteria, article identification, study selection, study quality evaluation, data extraction, and analysis and interpretation of findings [25]. In this study, the statements of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) were used [26].

Research question and keyword determination

According to the research question “How has the prevalence, incidence and mortality of anencephaly changed worldwide?” the following were defined: The study population (Population) included patients with anencephaly, result (Outcome) comprised the prevalence of anencephaly, date of publishing the first related article until March 23, 2021 was specified as the time range (Time or Duration), and type of study (study design) included cross-sectional studies (descriptive, descriptive-analytical). Keywords were extracted from the MeSH browser. Keywords related to the studied population (P): Anencephaly, Congenital Absence of Brain, Anencephalus, Anencephalia, Incomplete Anencephaly, Partial Anencephaly, Hemicranial Anencephaly, Aprosencephaly and Keywords related to outcome were (O), Prevalence, outbreak.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria according to the research question

Cross-sectional population-based studies (descriptive, descriptive-analytical) that reported the prevalence of anencephaly in different parts of the world, published in Persian and English with full texts available included in the study. Analytical, interventional, conferential, and group-case studies irrelevant to the research question and studies that were not in English or did not have English abstracts were excluded from the investigation.

Article identification

To review the literature, two Persian databases, including MagIran and SID, and four international ones, Science Direct, Web of Science (WoS), Medline (PubMed), and Scopus, were selected. The Google Scholar scientific search engine was considered for final review while no time limit was set for the search to retrieve relevant results; thus, all articles published up to March 23, 2021 were reviewed. Searching was limited to studies published in Persian and English and strategy in each database was determined using Advanced Search (Advance Search) with the help of all possible keyword combinations with the help of AND and OR operators. For example, searching strategy in the PubMed database was determined as follows: (prevalence [Title/Abstract] OR outbreak [Title/Abstract]) AND (Anencephaly [Title/Abstract] OR Congenital Absence of Brain [Title/Abstract] OR Anencephalus [Title/Abstract] OR Anencephalia [Title/Abstract] OR Incomplete Anencephaly [Title/Abstract] OR Partial Anencephaly [Title/Abstract] OR Hemicranial Anencephaly [Title/Abstract] OR Aprosencephaly [Title/Abstract]). In order to access the latest published studies, an alert was created on a number of important databases, including PubMed and Scopus, to check if new articles were published during the study. Also, in order to access all related studies, the sources of articles that met the inclusion criteria were manually reviewed. To avoid error, all steps of article search, study selection, qualitative evaluation and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers (BF and ND). If there was a difference of opinion among the researchers regarding the inclusion of the article in the study, in order to avoid the risk of biased selections for specific studies, first a final agreement was reached through discussion and in some cases with the participation and opinion of a third party (MM).

Selection of studies based on inclusion and exclusion criteria

The information of all articles found in each database was transferred to EndNote X8 software. After completing the search in all the databases, duplicate articles were excluded. Then, in order to avoid the risk of prejudice in selecting studies, the names of the authors and the titles of the journals of the articles were removed and a checklist was prepared based on the titles and abstracts of the studies. In the next step, two authors (N.D. and B.F.) independently examined the title and abstract of the research and eliminated irrelevant papers based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies with no full text were not considered for the systematic review and meta-analysis process. The full text of all remaining articles was then evaluated. Studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria based on the research question were out listed.

Qualitative evaluation of studies

Qualitative evaluation of studies was performed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, the NOS assigns a maximum of 9 points for the three areas of study group selection, group comparison, and exposure and outcome for the case and group studies [27]. Based on this, articles were classified as high quality (≥ 5) and low quality (< 5).

Extracting the data

After selecting the studies to enter the systematic review and meta-analysis process, the data were extracted and the studies were summarized. An electronic checklist was prepared for this purpose. The various items on the checklist included: the surname of the first author, year of publication and year of the report, sample size, number of patients, prevalence, incidence and mortality of patients.

Statistical analysis

To analyze and combine the results of different studies, in each study, the prevalence of anencephaly was considered as the probability of two-sentence distribution and its variance was calculated through two-sentence distribution. Heterogeneity of studies was assessed using I2 test. A Random effect model was used in case of I2 index above 50%. In this model, parameter changes between studies are also considered in the calculations, so it can be said that the results of this model in heterogeneous conditions can be more generalized than the model with a fixed effect. Due to the large sample size investigated in the study, Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation test was used at a significance level of 0.1 to check the publication bias. Data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2) software.

Results

Summary of how articles entered the meta-analysis

In this study, the statements of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) were used [26]. In the first stage, 1141 articles (1104 articles in international, 9 articles in Persian databases and 28 studies in reviewing article sources) were found, of which 330 duplicate studies were omitted. 811 studies entered the screening stage and 371 articles were deleted based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria by reviewing the title and abstract of the study. In the next stage (competency assessment), out of the remaining 440 studies from the screening stage, 58 articles were removed by reviewing the full text of the article because it was not relevant to the research. The quality evaluation of 382 articles included in this study was performed using the STROBE checklist, of which 22 studies had poor methodological quality and were deleted. Thus, 360 related studies entered the process of systematic review and meta-analysis (Fig. 1) [28].
Fig. 1

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA 2020) flow diagram

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA 2020) flow diagram

General characteristics of the studies:

The total sample size of the prevalence studies was 169,407,738 people. The studies were published between 1969 and March 23, 2021. The lowest sample size was related to the study of Castilla-17 et al. (1985) with 1623 people in [29] Colombia and the highest sample size was related to the study of James et al. (1993) with 15,487,449 people in the USA [30]. The surname of the first author, year of publication and year of reporting, place of study, maternal age, sample size, number of cases, prevalence, incidence and attenuation of anencephaly reported in Tables 1, 2 and 3.
Table 1

Summary of study specifications (prevalence of anencephaly)

First author, year, ReferencesReport yearContinentCountrySample sizeNumber of patients with Anencephaly
Gong-1, 2017, [1]2006AsiaChina306,734227
Gong-2, 2017, [1]2007AsiaChina341,432244
Gong-3, 2017, [1]2008AsiaChina330,414186
Gong-4, 2017, [1]2009AsiaChina321,353166
Gong-5, 2017, [1]2010AsiaChina307,826168
Gong-6, 2017, [1]2011AsiaChina304,079158
Gong-7, 2017, [1]2012AsiaChina353,108145
Gong-8, 2017, [1]2013AsiaChina321,171141
Gong-9, 2017, [1]2014AsiaChina364,400108
Gong-10, 2017, [1]2015AsiaChina298,43755
PEI, 2009, [2]2004–2006AsiaChina417528
Afshar, 2006, [3]1997–2001AsiaIran16,78523
Golalipour-1, 2007, [4]1998–2003AsiaIran37,95143
Li, 2006, [5]2003AsiaChina11,53476
LIAN, 1987, [6]1970–1984AsiaChina208,801461
Golalipour-2, 2010, [7]1998–2005AsiaIran30,63935
Xie, 2020, [8]2015–2018AsiaChina705,395188
Khattak, 2010, [9]2007AsiaSWAT556063
Golalipour-3, 2010, [10]1998–2005AsiaIran49,53456
Zhang-1, 2012, [11]2005–2008AsiaChina62,44343
Jung-1, 1999, [12]1993AsiaKorea601,376156
Jung-2, 1999, [12]1994AsiaKorea601,459255
Jaruratanasirikul, 2014, [13]2009–2012AsiaThailand148,75912
Zhu-1, 2012, [14]2006AsiaChina643,987407
Zhu-2, 2012, [14]2007AsiaChina777,397454
Zhu-3, 2012, [14]2008AsiaChina843,920465
Jin-1, 2017, [15]2006AsiaChina22,55916
Jin-2, 2017, [15]2007AsiaChina26,87413
Jin-3, 2017, [15]2008AsiaChina28,29119
Jin-4, 2017, [15]2009AsiaChina27,91620
Jin-5, 2017, [15]2010AsiaChina26,97312
Jin-6, 2017, [15]2011AsiaChina28,4249
Jin-7, 2017, [15]2012AsiaChina32,48913
Kant, 2017, [16]2001–2014AsiaIndia26,94633
Liu, 2007, [17]1996–2004AsiaChina99,88842
Ebrahimi, 2013, [18]2005–2011AsiaIran14,03459
Ghavami, 2011, [19]2005–2008AsiaIran22,50018
Kondo-1, 2019, [20]2014AsiaJapan156,79113
Kondo-2, 2019, [20]2015AsiaJapan158,34713
Tiwari, 2020, [21]2014AsiaIndia14,68119
IMAIZUMI-1, 1991, [22]1948–1958AsiaJapan27,89127
IMAIZUMI-2, 1991, [22]1959–1969AsiaJapan40,71522
IMAIZUMI-3, 1991, [22]1970–1980AsiaJapan39,50628
IMAIZUMI-4, 1991, [22]1981–1990AsiaJapan23,88417
Zhang-2, 2017, [23]2006–2015AsiaChina3,248,9541600
Seto-1, 2003, [24]1981–1990AsiaJapan136,84639
Seto-2, 2003, [24]1991–2000AsiaJapan117,3327
Fakheri, 2004, [25]1996–2001AsiaIran81,538106
PourIsa, 2005, [26]1997–2003AsiaIran21,07429
Golalipour-4, 2004, [27]1997–2001AsiaIran26,28039
Stoll-1, 2006, [28]1988–1992EuropeFrance68,3269
Stoll-2, 2006, [28]1993–1995EuropeFrance39,2864
Stoll-3, 2006, [28]1996–2002EuropeFrance95,05810
RICHARDS, 1972, [31]1964–1966EuropeWales92,9802145
Stoll-4, 2011, [32]1979–2008EuropeFrance402,532182
Szabó-1, 2013, [33]1980–1991EuropeHungary209,76264
Szabó-2, 2013, [33]1994–2005EuropeHungary155,97829
Pietrzyk-1, 1983, [34]1970–1972EuropePoland33,7669
Pietrzyk-2, 1983, [34]1979- 1981EuropePoland46,81811
McDonnell-1, 1999, [35]1980–1994EuropeEast Ireland320,750322
Boyd-1, 2000, [36]2000EuropeDenmark87882
Boyd-2, 2000, [36]2000EuropeNetherlands81,98018
Boyd-3, 2000, [36]2000EuropeAustria29,0263
Boyd-4, 2000, [36]2000EuropeCroatia10,7182
Boyd-5, 2000, [36]2000EuropeFrance60,70515
Boyd-6, 2000, [36]2000EuropeGermany18,2807
Boyd-7, 2000, [36]2000EuropeItaly204,17834
Boyd-8, 2000, [36]2000EuropeLithuania95,46929
Boyd-9, 2000, [36]2000EuropeSpain38,16614
Boyd-10, 2000, [36]2000EuropeUkraine44,76111
Boyd-11, 2000, [36]2000EuropeUK78,69531
Salvador, 2011, [37]1992–2006EuropeSpain197,00387
DOLK-1, 1991, [38]19,980–1987EuropeUK& Ireland577,989739
DOLK-2, 1991, [38]19,980–1986EuropeEurope & Malta378,849184
Khoshnood-1, 2015, [39]1991–2009EuropeAustria216,19640
Khoshnood-2, 2015, [39]1991–2011EuropeBelgium601,565182
Khoshnood-3, 2015, [39]2000–2009EuropeCzech Republic1,029,247245
Khoshnood-4, 2015, [39]1991–2010EuropeCroatia131 52518
Khoshnood-5, 2015, [39]1991–2011EuropeDenmark115 84644
Khoshnood-6, 2015, [39]1993–2010EuropeFinland1,070,940314
Khoshnood-7, 2015, [39]1991–2011EuropeFrance666,353347
Khoshnood-8, 2015, [39]1991–2011EuropeGermany360,80195
Khoshnood-9, 2015, [39]1998–2010EuropeHungary1,260,719256
Khoshnood-10, 2015, [39]1991–2011EuropeIreland702,747244
Khoshnood-11, 2015, [39]1991–2011EuropeItaly1,215,306217
Khoshnood-12, 2015, [39]1991–2010EuropeMalta88,57325
Khoshnood-13, 2015, [39]1991–2011EuropeNetherlands401,404108
Khoshnood-14, 2015, [39]1999–2011EuropeNorway775,060282
Khoshnood-15, 2015, [39]1999–2010EuropePoland440,16371
Khoshnood-16, 2015, [39]1991–2010EuropePortugal316,85362
Khoshnood-17, 2015, [39]1991–2010EuropeSpain361,416189
Khoshnood-18, 2015, [39]1991–2011EuropeSwitzerland159,27362
Khoshnood-19, 2015, [39]1991–2011EuropeUK2,556,0751361
Loane, 2009, [40]2000–2004EuropeUK1,740,71840
Peake, 2021, [41]2006–2011EuropeUK1,351,405673
Boyd-12, 2011, [42]2005–2006EuropeUK601,545366
Poretti, 2008, [43]2001–2007EuropeSwitzerland10,769,23022
Obeid-1, 2015, [44]2000–2010EuropeEurope9,161,1893221
Obeid-2, 2015, [44]2000–2010EuropeGermany227,78156
GARNE, 2005, [45]1995–1999Europe17 European regions1,198,519498
CADAS, 1978, [46]1955–1965EuropeGreece74,39049
Loncarek-1, 2001, [47]1963EuropeCroatia29461
Loncarek-2, 2001, [47]1966EuropeCroatia29881
Loncarek-3, 2001, [47]1967EuropeCroatia29742
Loncarek-4, 2001, [47]1971EuropeCroatia35821
Loncarek-5, 2001, [47]1972EuropeCroatia35221
Loncarek-6, 2001, [47]1973EuropeCroatia35801
Loncarek-7, 2001, [47]1974EuropeCroatia36121
Loncarek-8, 2001, [47]1975EuropeCroatia36921
Loncarek-9, 2001, [47]1979EuropeCroatia41741
Loncarek-10, 2001, [47]1980EuropeCroatia42421
Loncarek-11, 2001, [47]1983EuropeCroatia40423
Loncarek-12, 2001, [47]1988EuropeCroatia36551
Loncarek-13, 2001, [47]1989EuropeCroatia35042
Loncarek-14, 2001, [47]1992EuropeCroatia36471
Loncarek-15, 2001, [47]1993EuropeCroatia34681
Loncarek-16, 2001, [47]1994EuropeCroatia33261
Loncarek-17,2001, [47]1996EuropeCroatia34121
Loncarek-18, 2001, [47]1998EuropeCroatia30171
EUROCAT GROUP-1, 1991, [48]1980–1986EuropeRepublic of Ireland183,278242
EUROCAT GROUP-2, 1991, [48]1980–1986EuropeUK467,437597
EUROCAT GROUP-3, 1991, [48]1980–1986EuropeBelgium57,35231
EUROCAT GROUP-4, 1991, [48]1980–1986EuropeNetherlands50,43733
EUROCAT GROUP-5, 1991, [48]1980–1986EuropeDenmark32,64817
EUROCAT GROUP-6, 1991, [48]1980–1986EuropeFrance349,737143
EUROCAT GROUP-7, 1991, [48]1980–1986EuropeItaly63,26128
EUROCAT GROUP-8, 1991, [48]1980–1986EuropeMalta22,22513
EUROCAT GROUP-9, 1987, [49]1980–1983EuropeRepublic of Ireland109,276168
EUROCAT GROUP-10, 1987, [49]1980–1983EuropeUK244,955309
EUROCAT GROUP-11, 1987, [49]1980–1983EuropeDenmark18,5338
EUROCAT GROUP-12, 1987, [49]1980–1983EuropeNetherlands23,15013
EUROCAT GROUP-13, 1987, [49]1980–1983EuropeBelgium60,03425
EUROCAT GROUP-14, 1987, [49]1980–1983EuropeFrance143,87869
EUROCAT GROUP-15, 1987, [49]1980–1983EuropeLuxembourg91483
EUROCAT GROUP-16, 1987, [49]1980–1983EuropeGermany21,9859
EUROCAT GROUP-17, 1987, [49]1980–1983EuropeItaly135,66228
Smithells, 1989, [50]1985–1986EuropeUK97,10167
Corona-Rivera-1, 2021, [51]1991–2002EuropeMexico95,45421
Corona-Rivera-2, 2021, [51]2003–2019EuropeMexico171,79567
Stone-1, 1988, [52]1974EuropeScotland14,88033
Stone-2, 1988, [52]1975EuropeScotland14,39839
Stone-3, 1988, [52]1976EuropeScotland12,88934
Stone-4, 1988, [52]1977EuropeScotland12,48728
Stone-5, 1988, [52]1978EuropeScotland12,49130
Stone-6, 1988, [52]1979EuropeScotland13,33929
Stone-7, 1988, [52]1980EuropeScotland13,43824
Stone-8, 1988, [52]1981EuropeScotland13,49119
Stone-9, 1988, [52]1982EuropeScotland12,88419
Stone-10, 1988, [52]1983EuropeScotland12,66119
Stone-11, 1988, [52]1984EuropeScotland12,78314
Stone-12, 1988, [52]1985EuropeScotland13,08915
CARSTAIRS-1, 1984, [53]1971EuropeScotland87,883224
CARSTAIRS-2, 1984, [53]1972EuropeScotland79,603185
CARSTAIRS-3, 1984, [53]1973EuropeScotland75,265181
CARSTAIRS-4, 1984, [53]1974EuropeScotland70,943156
CARSTAIRS-5, 1984, [53]1975EuropeScotland68,708140
CARSTAIRS-6, 1984, [53]1976EuropeScotland65,52489
CARSTAIRS-7, 1984, [53]1977EuropeScotland62,89566
CARSTAIRS-8, 1984, [53]1978EuropeScotland64,81957
CARSTAIRS-9, 1984, [53]1979EuropeScotland68,84147
CARSTAIRS-10, 1984, [53]1980EuropeScotland69,35532
CARSTAIRS-11, 1984, [53]1981EuropeScotland69,49019
CARSTAIRS-12, 1984, [53]1982EuropeScotland66,58213
Rankin-1, 2000, [54]1984EuropeUK39,35727
Rankin-2, 2000, [54]1985EuropeUK41,17533
Rankin-3, 2000, [54]1986EuropeUK40,54127
Rankin-4, 2000, [54]1987EuropeUK40,70035
Rankin-5, 2000, [54]1988EuropeUK40,42833
Rankin-6, 2000, [54]1989EuropeUK39,41136
Rankin-7, 2000, [54]1990EuropeUK40,96630
Rankin-8, 2000, [54]1991EuropeUK41,48426
Rankin-9, 2000, [54]1992EuropeUK40,31641
Rankin-10, 2000, [54]1993EuropeUK38,96026
Rankin-11, 2000, [54]1994EuropeUK35,38021
Rankin-12, 2000, [54]1995EuropeUK34,48732
Rankin-13, 2000, [54]1996EuropeUK34,02421
Fleurke-Rozema, 2015, [55]2008–2013EuropeNetherlands203,703110
Sever-1, 1982, [56]1966AmericaUSA124,46766
Sever-2, 1982, [56]1967AmericaUSA124,44155
Sever-3, 1982, [56]1968AmericaUSA126,63761
Sever-4, 1982, [56]1969AmericaUSA131,34382
Sever-5, 1982, [56]1970AmericaUSA134,04565
Sever-6, 1982, [56]1971AmericaUSA117,32459
Sever-7, 1982, [56]1972AmericaUSA107,09460
Limb-1, 1994, [57]1972–1974AmericaUSA18,15517
Limb-2, 1994, [57]1979–1981AmericaUSA21,43610
Limb-3, 1994, [57]1982–1984AmericaUSA25,21811
Limb-4, 1994, [57]1985–1987AmericaUSA30,21716
Limb-5, 1994, [57]1988–1990AmericaUSA31,29020
Groisman-1, 2019, [58]2016AmericaArgentina305,45257
Rowland, 2006, [59]1968–2002AmericaUSA1,164,865431
Krajewski, 2021, [60]2007–2010AmericaUSA1,610,709433
Bronberg, 2020, [61]2010–2016AmericaArgentina228,208111
Carmichael, 2004, [62]1989–1997AmericaUSA2,234,846535
Shaw, 2002, [63]1985–1997AmericaUSA1,303,306197
Estevez-Ordonez, 2017, [64]2010–2015AmericaHonduras123,90330
Biggar-1, 1976, [65]1918AmericaUSA71993
Biggar-2, 1976, [65]1919AmericaUSA69731
Biggar-3, 1976, [65]1920AmericaUSA715310
Biggar-4, 1976, [65]1921AmericaUSA72724
Biggar-5, 1976, [65]1922AmericaUSA69053
Biggar-6, 1976, [65]1923AmericaUSA72567
Biggar-7, 1976, [65]1924AmericaUSA59673
Biggar-8, 1976, [65]1925AmericaUSA69252
Biggar-9, 1976, [65]1926AmericaUSA63933
Biggar-10, 1976, [65]1927AmericaUSA67178
Biggar-11, 1976, [65]1928AmericaUSA63705
Biggar-12, 1976, [65]1929AmericaUSA61167
Biggar-13, 1976, [65]1930AmericaUSA58722
Biggar-14, 1976, [65]1931AmericaUSA56328
Biggar-15, 1976, [65]1932AmericaUSA55746
Biggar-16, 1976, [65]1933AmericaUSA50657
Biggar-17, 1976, [65]1934AmericaUSA512710
Biggar-18, 1976, [65]1935AmericaUSA51016
Biggar-19, 1976, [65]1936AmericaUSA50568
Biggar-20, 1976, [65]1937AmericaUSA53148
Biggar-21, 1976, [65]1938AmericaUSA56137
Sargiotto, 2015, [66]2009–2013AmericaArgentina703,325212
Pacheco, 2009, [67]2000–2006AmericaBrasil161,34134
Janerich-1, 1973, [68]1945–1947AmericaUSA407,326463
Janerich-2, 1973, [68]1948–1950AmericaUSA454,206476
Janerich-3, 1973, [68]1951–1953AmericaUSA510,601397
Janerich-4, 1973, [68]1954–1956AmericaUSA565.391398
Janerich-5, 1973, [68]1957–1959AmericaUSA601,196375
Janerich-6, 1973, [68]1960–1962AmericaUSA605,336392
Janerich-7, 1973, [68]1963–1965AmericaUSA574,662376
Janerich-8, 1973, [68]1966–1968AmericaUSA506,706337
Janerich-9, 1973, [68]1969–1971AmericaUSA499,131248
Jorde, 1984, [69]1940–1979AmericaUSA979,873374
Castilla-1, 1985, [29]1967AmericaSouth America12,4307
Castilla-2, 1985, [29]1968AmericaSouth American33,8748
Castilla-3, 1985, [29]1969AmericaSouth American42,8747
Castilla-4, 1985, [29]1970AmericaSouth American51,53511
Castilla-5, 1985, [29]1971AmericaSouth American47,1569
Castilla-6, 1985, [29]1972AmericaSouth American50,78613
Castilla-7, 1985, [29]1973AmericaSouth American65,00913
Castilla-8, 1985, [29]1974AmericaSouth American84,96131
Castilla-9, 1985, [29]1975AmericaSouth American65,21411
Castilla-10, 1985, [29]1976AmericaSouth American77,99222
Castilla-11, 1985, [29]1977AmericaSouth American67,43219
Castilla-12, 1985, [29]1978AmericaSouth American72,23121
Castilla-13, 1985, [29]1979AmericaSouth American68,64520
Castilla-14, 1985, [29]1980–1982AmericaArgentina70,76838
Castilla-15, 1985, [29]1980–1982AmericaBolivia8,5145
Castilla-16, 1985, [29]1980–1982AmericaBrazil43,70226
Castilla-17, 1985, [29]1980–1982AmericaColombia1,6230
Castilla-18, 1985, [29]1980–1982AmericaChile25,63423
Castilla-19, 1985, [29]1980–1982AmericaEcuador19,46310
Castilla-20, 1985, [29]1980–1982AmericaParaguay3,4432
Castilla-21, 1985, [29]1980–1982AmericaPeru15,9434
Castilla-22, 1985, [29]1980–1982AmericaUruguay10,91611
Castilla-23, 1985, [29]1980–1982AmericaVenezuela55,82835
Groisman-2, 2017, [70]2009–2013AmericaArgentina703,422212
Forrester-1, 1998, [71]1987–1996AmericaUSA150,00075
Parks, 2011, [72]1999—2005AmericaUSA2,594,295677
Cragan-1, 2009, [73]1995–2004AmericaUSA470,80281
Besser, 2007, [74]1968–2003AmericaUSA398,165434
de Souza, 2020, [75]2012–2017AmericaBrazil30,7619
James, 1993, [30]1970–1987AmericaUSA15,487,4496040
Parker-1, 2010, [76]2004–2006AmericaUSA3,120,605.00697
Parker-2, 2010, [76]2004–2006AmericaUSA2,075,973211
Parker 3, 2010, [76]2004–2006AmericaUSA2,145,287192
Feuchtbaum, 1999, [77]1990–1994AmericaUSA1,618,279770
Windham-1, 1982, [78]1966–1972AmericaUSA865,351447
Aguiar, 2003, [79]1999–2000AmericaLatin-America18,80724
Poletta, 2018, [80]1990–2013AmericaVenezuela353,956155
Castilla-24, 2003, [81]1999AmericaChile10,74010
Castilla-25, 2003, [81]2000AmericaChile12,9775
Castilla-26, 2003, [81]2001AmericaChile11,4627
Forrester-2, 2000, [82]1986–1997AmericaUSA246,18989
Winsor, 1986, [83]1980–1984AmericaCanada61,50043
Bidondo, 2015, [84]2009–2013AmericaArgentina703 325164
De Wals, 2007, [85]1993–2002AmericaCanada1,909,741830
Yang, 2004, [86]1989–2000AmericaUSA2,615,197617
Boulet-1, 2011, [87]1995–2005AmericaUSA522,31529
McBride, 1979, [88]1952–1970AmericaColumbia686,326466
Siffel, 2005, [89]1978–2001AmericaUSA874,100243
Mathews-1, 2002, [90]1991AmericaUSA3,564,453655
Mathews-2, 2002, [90]1992AmericaUSA3,572,890457
Mathews-3, 2002, [90]1993AmericaUSA3,562,723481
Mathews-4, 2002, [90]1994AmericaUSA3,527,482387
Mathews-5, 2002, [90]1995AmericaUSA3,484,539408
Mathews-6, 2002, [90]1996AmericaUSA3,478,723416
Mathews-7, 2002, [90]1997AmericaUSA3,469,667434
Mathews-8, 2002, [90]1998AmericaUSA3,519,240349
Mathews-9, 2002, [90]1999AmericaUSA3,533,565382
Mathews-10, 2002, [90]2000AmericaUSA3,640,376376
Mathews-11, 2002, [90]2001AmericaUSA3,649,061343
Cragan-2, 1995, [91]1985–1994AmericaUSA211,024268
Canfield, 2009, [92]1999–2003AmericaUSA1,827,317514
Feldman, 1982, [93]1968–1976AmericaUSA173,65589
Naggan-1, 1969, [94]1930–1933AmericaUSA14,05238
Naggan-2, 1969, [94]1934–1937AmericaUSA16,17928
Naggan-3, 1969, [94]1938–1941AmericaUSA18,20634
Naggan-4, 1969, [94]1942–1945AmericaUSA22,05925
Naggan-5, 1969, [94]1946–1949AmericaUSA28,09725
Naggan-6, 1969, [94]1950–1953AmericaUSA43,44137
Naggan-7, 1969, [94]1954–1957AmericaUSA52,03232
Naggan-8, 1969, [94]1958–1961AmericaUSA57,639.0035
Naggan-9, 1969, [94]1962–1965AmericaUSA60,00251
Windham-2, 1982, [95]1966–1979AmericaUSA & Norway1,656,116802
Boulet-2, 2008, [96]1999–2000AmericaUSA3,165,992782
Boulet-3, 2008, [96]2001–2002AmericaUSA3,218,605692
Boulet-4, 2008, [96]2003–2004AmericaUSA3,242,424642
Bupp, 2015, [97]1992–2012AmericaUSA1,116,289240
Nasri, 2014, [98]1991–2011AfricaTunisia3,803,889174
Berihu, 2018, [99]2018AfricaEthiopia14,90399
Forci, 2020, [100]2011–2016AfricaMorocco43,92322
Buccimazza, 1994, [101]1973–1992AfricaSouth Africa516,252164
Omer, 2016, [102]2014–2015AfricaSudan36,78518
Riley, 1998, [103]1983–1995AustraliaAustralia825,051452
Owen, 2000, [104]1983–1997AustraliaAustralia949,914550
Chan-1, 1993, [105]1966AustraliaAustralia20,55624
Chan-2, 1993, [105]1967AustraliaAustralia20,5978
Chan-3, 1993, [105]1968AustraliaAustralia21,42427
Chan-4, 1993, [105]1969AustraliaAustralia22,18525
Chan-5, 1993, [105]1970AustraliaAustralia22,81713
Chan-6, 1993, [105]1971AustraliaAustralia23,24627
Chan-7, 1993, [105]1972AustraliaAustralia22,07325
Chan-8, 1993, [105]1973AustraliaAustralia20,65122
Chan-9, 1993, [105]1974AustraliaAustralia20,41722
Chan-10, 1993, [105]1975AustraliaAustralia20,17517
Chan-11, 1993, [105]1976AustraliaAustralia19,15715
Chan-12, 1993, [105]1977AustraliaAustralia19,43815
Chan-13, 1993, [105]1978AustraliaAustralia18,73617
Chan-14, 1993, [105]1979AustraliaAustralia18,64119
Chan-15, 1993, [105]1980AustraliaAustralia18,63820
Chan-16, 1993, [105]1981AustraliaAustralia19,05212
Chan-17, 1993, [105]1982AustraliaAustralia19,12819
Chan-18, 1993, [105]1983AustraliaAustralia19,80015
Chan-19, 1993, [105]1984AustraliaAustralia20,28117
Chan-20, 1993, [105]1985AustraliaAustralia19,83314
Chan-21, 1993, [105]1986AustraliaAustralia19,80016
Chan-22, 1993, [105]1987AustraliaAustralia19,39516
Chan-23, 1993, [105]1988AustraliaAustralia19,53014
Chan-24, 1993, [105]1989AustraliaAustralia19,82317
Chan-25, 1993, [105]1990AustraliaAustralia19,98823
Chan-26, 1993, [105]1991AustraliaAustralia19,74920
Barry Borman, 1986, [106]1978AustraliaNew Zealand52,14351
BORMAN, 1993, [107]1978–1982AustraliaNew Zealand262,821205
Table 2

Summary of study specifications (incidence of Anencephaly)

First author, year, referencesReport yearContinentCountrySample sizeNumber of patients with Anencephaly
Safdar, 2007, [108]1997–2005AsiaSaudi Arabia33,4891
Al-Ani, 2010, [109]2007–2008AsiaIraq10,0169
Bener, 2012, [110]1985–2009AsiaQatar302,049102
Akar-1, 1988, [111]1983EuropeTurkey6281
Akar-2, 1988, [111]1984EuropeTurkey5631
Akar-3, 1988, [111]1985EuropeTurkey7562
Akar-4, 1988, [111]1986EuropeTurkey11452
Akar-5, 1988, [111]1987EuropeTurkey6006
Onrat, 2009, [112]2003–2004EuropeTurkey863112
SN ÍPEK, 2002, [113]1961–1999EuropeCzech Republic5,499,0081812
McDonnell-2, 2015, [114]2009–2011EuropeRepublic of Ireland226,923106
Evans, 1979, [115]1965–1976EuropeWales70,871146
Van Allen-1, 2006, [116]1997AmericaColumbia44,73417
Van Allen-2, 2006, [116]1998AmericaColumbia43,14112
Van Allen-3, 2006, [116]1999AmericaColumbia42,04028
Table 3

Summary of study specifications (mortality of Anencephaly)

First author, year, referencesReport yearContinentCountrySample sizeNumber of deaths due to Anencephaly
Kancherla, 2018, [117]2015AsiaIndia25,794,00064,485
Tanner, 2010, [118]1999–2006AmericaUSA1,701,076123
Wen-1, 2000, [119]1981–1983AmericaCanada580,000116
Wen-2, 2000, [119]1993–1995AmericaCanada542,85738
Dixon, 2019, [120]2016AfricaEthiopia3,328,86721,638
Summary of study specifications (prevalence of anencephaly) Summary of study specifications (incidence of Anencephaly) Summary of study specifications (mortality of Anencephaly) The result of the I2 test for the prevalence of anencephaly in different parts of the world indicates a significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 99.9), so the data were analyzed by meta-analysis using a random effects model. Due to the high heterogeneity of the studies, sensitivity analysis was performed and the effect of each study on the final result and the degree of heterogeneity were evaluated. Based on Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation tests, the publication bias in the studies with less than 0.1% was not observed. (P = 0.105) (Table 4).
Table 4

General analysis of the prevalence of anencephaly per 10,000 births worldwide and continents by sample size, heterogeneity, publication bias

Meta-analysisNSample sizeI2Begg and MazumdarPrevalence (95% CI)
Overall prevalence340169,407,73899.90.1055.1 (95% CI 4.7–5.5)
Continent
 Asia5012,449,40299.90.7766.5 (95% CI 5.5–7.7)
 Europe12643,826,07999.90.9064.8 (95% CI 4.2–5.5)
 America128106,111,86899.90.8094.3 (95% CI 3.8–4.8)
 Africa54,415,75299.90.2786.5 (95% CI 1–9.9)
 Australia3012,615,06499.70.1118.6 (95% CI 7.7–9.5)
General analysis of the prevalence of anencephaly per 10,000 births worldwide and continents by sample size, heterogeneity, publication bias As a result of the combination of studies, the overall estimate of the prevalence of Anencephaly in the world will be 5.1 per ten thousand births (95% confidence interval 4.7–5.5) based on the random effects model (Table 4). According to different reports of Anencephaly prevalence in different parts of the world, subgroup analysis by different continents (Asia, Europe, USA, Africa and Australia) is reported in Table 2, which has the highest prevalence in Australia with 8.6 per ten thousand births (confidence interval). 95%: 7.7–9.5) (Table 4). Incidence and mortality of Anencephaly were 8.3 per ten thousand births (95% confidence interval 5.5–9.9) and 5.5 per ten thousand births (95% confidence interval 1.8–15) respectively (Table 5).
Table 5

General analysis of the incidence and mortality of anencephaly per 10,000 births worldwide and continents by sample size, heterogeneity, publication bias

ContinentNSample sizeI2Begg and MazumdarPrevalence (95% CI)
Incidence156,284,59499.90.7668.3 (95% CI 5.5–9.9)
Mortality531,946,80099.90.4625.5 (95% CI 1.8–15)
General analysis of the incidence and mortality of anencephaly per 10,000 births worldwide and continents by sample size, heterogeneity, publication bias

Discussion

Neural tube defects (NTDs) are a major congenital structural disorder of the brain and spinal cord that occurs early in pregnancy as a result of defective neural tube closure [9], including abortion, stillbirth, and lifelong disability, as well as high emotional, psychological and economic consequences (138). Many factors, including radiation therapy, drugs, malnutrition, chemicals, and genetic determinants (mutations in folate-responsive or folate-dependent pathways) can adversely affect CNS growth during pregnancy and cause neural tube defects [12]. Anencephaly, which is the partial or complete absence of the brain and skull [3] is one of the most common forms of NTD. The fetus with anencephaly dies or will die in the first few hours after birth [9]. Exposure to methotrexate, aminopterin and valproic acid, maternal characteristics, race, ethnicity, geography, nutritional, biological and poor economic conditions are all risk factors for anencephaly [121, 122]. According to the present systematic review and meta-analysis, the overall prevalence of anencephaly in the world was 5.1 per ten thousand births. The highest prevalence of anencephaly was related to the study of RICHARDS et al. [57] with 230.69 infants with anencephaly per ten thousand births and the lowest prevalence was related to the study of Castilla et al. [31] with zero cases per ten thousand births. The most comprehensive study in terms of sample size was the study of James et al. (1993) with 15,487,449 people in the USA [32] that reported the prevalence of anencephaly at 3.89 per thousand births. Also, the present study estimated the risk of incidence and death due to anencephaly: 8.3 per ten thousand births and 5.5 per ten thousand births worldwide. Bhide et al. (2013) reported the prevalence of anencephaly in India at 2.1 per thousand births through 19 studies [123]. A meta-analysis and systematic review by Bitew et al. (2020) reported the prevalence of NTD in Ethiopia. 63.3 per ten thousand births [124]. Our study is almost in line with these studies and regarding the cause of minor differences between the present study and these studies, we can point out that the number of articles studied in the present study is more (121 articles in the present study versus 19 articles in the study of Bhide et al.) And also, the present study has examined patients with different races and geographical regions in the world. Due to the change in population structure in different countries and different reports of the prevalence of anencephaly, the need for a detailed study of the prevalence of this defect in different continents in order to pay more attention to the process and its consequences seems inevitable. Therefore, according to the analysis of subgroups according to different continents, the highest prevalence of anencephaly is related to the continent of Australia with 8.6 per ten thousand births and the lowest belongs to the Americas with 4.3 per thousand births. The results show that in addition to genetics, various environmental factors can also be involved in the development of anencephaly. So far, folic acid is the most important factor in preventing neural tube defects. Reports suggest the use of periovulation fulate supplements significantly reduces the risk of recurrence of anencephaly and other neural tube defects [125]. Regarding the serious nature of anencephaly and its high mortality, genetic counseling, folic acid supplements and prenatal diagnosis of neural tube defects are extremely important or (Given the seriousness of anencephaly and its high mortality rate, genetic counseling, folic acid supplements, and prenatal detection of neural tube abnormalities are critical.). This defect can be diagnosed by screening AFP (alpha-fetoprotein) with a combination of ultrasound and amniocentesis between 14 and 16 weeks of gestation [3, 5]. These studies can provide useful information to health care providers and enrich health care interventions and improve the quality of services and life [126].

Limitations

One of the limitations of this study is that some samples were not based on random selection. Also, non-homogeneous reporting of articles, non-homogeneous method of implementation, and unavailability of the full text of the papers presented at the conference can be added. Such conditions can justify the high heterogeneity reported in the studies, and therefore, if these limitations and differences in the studies did not exist, the heterogeneity analysis could be less.

Conclusion

The results of this study demonstrate that the prevalence of anencephaly in the world is high; therefore, it is necessary for physicians and specialists to emphasize the importance of preventive as well as control and treatment strategies.
  122 in total

1.  Extremely high prevalence of neural tube defects in a 4-county area in Shanxi Province, China.

Authors:  Zhiwen Li; Aiguo Ren; Le Zhang; Rongwei Ye; Song Li; Junchi Zheng; Shixin Hong; Taimei Wang; Zhu Li
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2006-04

2.  High potential for reducing folic acid-preventable spina bifida and anencephaly, and related stillbirth and child mortality, in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Meredith Dixon; Vijaya Kancherla; Tony Magana; Afework Mulugeta; Godfrey P Oakley
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 3.  Prevention of Seroma Formation Following Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos Seretis; Dimitrios Goulis; Efterpi C Demiri; Efstathios G Lykoudis
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.283

4.  Birth defects surveillance in Florida: infant death certificates as a case ascertainment source.

Authors:  Jean Paul Tanner; Jason L Salemi; Kimberlea W Hauser; Jane A Correia; Sharon M Watkins; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2010-09-14

Review 5.  Risk factors in the prevalence of anencephalus and spina bifida in New Zealand.

Authors:  G B Borman; A H Smith; J K Howard
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1986-04

6.  Including prenatal diagnoses in birth defects monitoring: Experience of the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program.

Authors:  Janet D Cragan; Suzanne M Gilboa
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2009-01

7.  An epidemiologic study of neural tube defects in Los Angeles County II. Etiologic factors in an area with low prevalence at birth.

Authors:  L E Sever
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1982-06

8.  The association of twinning and neural tube defects: studies in Los Angeles, California, and Norway.

Authors:  G C Windham; T Bjerkedal; L E Sever
Journal:  Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma)       Date:  1982

9.  Neural tube defects in Beijing-Tianjin area of China. Urban-rural distribution and some other epidemiological characteristics.

Authors:  Z H Lian; H Y Yang; Z Li
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Time trends in the prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of neural tube defects in Liaoning Province, China, 2006-2015: A population-based study.

Authors:  Tie-Ning Zhang; Ting-Ting Gong; Yan-Ling Chen; Qi-Jun Wu; Yuan Zhang; Cheng-Zhi Jiang; Jing Li; Li-Li Li; Chen Zhou; Yan-Hong Huang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.