Literature DB >> 19089857

Including prenatal diagnoses in birth defects monitoring: Experience of the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program.

Janet D Cragan1, Suzanne M Gilboa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advances in prenatal diagnosis have led to changes in the management of pregnancies affected with birth defects. These changes pose unique challenges for birth defects monitoring programs which use hospital-based sources.
METHODS: In 1994, Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP) abstractors began to visit area perinatologists' offices to identify pregnancies diagnosed prenatally with fetal defects. These pregnancies were then linked with existing MACDP cases and the hospital deliveries abstracted. Those without a hospital delivery were included as having unknown outcomes. Prenatally diagnosed defects were classified as definite or possible based on the certainty of the prenatal description. For 1995-2004, we calculated minimum and maximum adjusted defect prevalences by adding definite prenatal defects, and definite plus possible prenatal defects, to the hospital-based cases.
RESULTS: We identified 1009 pregnancies with a prenatally diagnosed defect not ascertained from MACDP hospital sources. Including these increased the total defect prevalence from 28 per 1000 live births to a minimum of 29.94 (6.9% increase) and maximum of 30.14 (7.7% increase) per 1000. The minimum increase was greater than 50% for conjoined twins, triploidy, craniorachischisis, cystic hygroma, Klinefelter syndrome, anencephaly, Turner syndrome, and trisomies 13, 18 and 21 among mothers >or=35.
CONCLUSIONS: These data reflect the variety of congenital abnormalities that can be detected prenatally and the importance of including prenatal diagnoses in birth defects monitoring data. Birth defects monitoring programs should assess individually the extent to which prenatal diagnosis can affect the accuracy and completeness of their data. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2009. Published 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19089857     DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol        ISSN: 1542-0752


  27 in total

1.  Mortality resulting from congenital heart disease among children and adults in the United States, 1999 to 2006.

Authors:  Suzanne M Gilboa; Jason L Salemi; Wendy N Nembhard; David E Fixler; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Next steps for birth defects research and prevention: The birth defects study to evaluate pregnancy exposures (BD-STEPS).

Authors:  Sarah C Tinker; Suzan L Carmichael; Marlene Anderka; Marilyn L Browne; Kristin M Caspers Conway; Robert E Meyer; Wendy N Nembhard; Richard S Olney; Jennita Reefhuis
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2015-04-06

Review 3.  Transamniotic Stem Cell Therapy.

Authors:  Stefanie P Lazow; Dario O Fauza
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  The contribution of chromosomal abnormalities to congenital heart defects: a population-based study.

Authors:  Robert J Hartman; Sonja A Rasmussen; Lorenzo D Botto; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Christa L Martin; Janet D Cragan; Mikyong Shin; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 5.  Pregnancy termination following prenatal diagnosis of anencephaly or spina bifida: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Candice Y Johnson; Margaret A Honein; W Dana Flanders; Penelope P Howards; Godfrey P Oakley; Sonja A Rasmussen
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2012-10-25

6.  Is maternal parity an independent risk factor for birth defects?

Authors:  Hao T Duong; Adrienne T Hoyt; Suzan L Carmichael; Suzanne M Gilboa; Mark A Canfield; Amy Case; Melanie L McNeese; Dorothy Kim Waller
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2012-02-28

7.  A description of spina bifida cases and co-occurring malformations, 1976-2011.

Authors:  Samantha E Parker; Mahsa M Yazdy; Allen A Mitchell; Laurie A Demmer; Martha M Werler
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Trends in survival among children with Down syndrome in 10 regions of the United States.

Authors:  James E Kucik; Mikyong Shin; Csaba Siffel; Lisa Marengo; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Racial/ethnic differences in infant mortality attributable to birth defects by gestational age.

Authors:  Cheryl S Broussard; Suzanne M Gilboa; Kyung A Lee; Matthew Oster; Joann R Petrini; Margaret A Honein
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Population-based birth defects data in the United States, 2008 to 2012: Presentation of state-specific data and descriptive brief on variability of prevalence.

Authors:  Cara T Mai; Jennifer Isenburg; Peter H Langlois; C J Alverson; Suzanne M Gilboa; Russel Rickard; Mark A Canfield; Suzanne B Anjohrin; Philip J Lupo; Deanna R Jackson; Erin B Stallings; Angela E Scheuerle; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2015-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.