BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no optimal treatment strategy for ostial left anterior descending (LAD) or ostial left circumflex artery (LCx) lesions. This study explored effectiveness and safety of drug-coated balloons (DCB) in individuals presenting with ostial LAD or LCx lesions. METHODS: A total of 137 patients with de novo ostial LAD or LCx lesions scheduled for DCB treatment were prospectively recruited into the study. After mandatory lesion preparation, DCB-only or hybrid strategy [DCB + drug-eluting stent (DES)] were performed on 120 patients (87.59%). The primary endpoint was the rate of 2-year target lesion revascularization (TLR). Rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and vessel thrombosis were explored as the secondary outcomes. Quantitative coronary angiography software was used to analyze coronary angiograms. RESULTS: Of the participants, 58 were treated with DCB-only and 62 with hybrid strategy. Relative to the DCB-only group, patients in the hybrid group had longer target lesions (15.47 ± 10.08 vs. 36.85 ± 9.46 mm, P<0.001) and higher Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) scores (23.47 ± 5.22 vs. 29.98 ± 3.18, P<0.001). During follow-up (731 ± 64 days), neither the primary endpoint (TLR) nor the secondary endpoints (including MACE, cardiac death, TVMI, and vessel thrombosis) differed statistically between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Treatment strategy (DCB-only or hybrid) was not a significant risk factor for TLR. Patients who underwent DCB-only exhibited less late lumen loss compared with the patients who underwent hybrid strategy (-0.26 ± 0.59 vs. 0.42 ± 0.47 mm, P<0.001) at 1-year angiographic follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: With regards to safety and efficacy, the strategy of DCB as a standalone therapy was similar in comparison with the hybrid strategy of DCB + DES for ostial LAD and ostial LCx lesions. This approach might be effective and technically easy in treating ostial LAD and LCx diseases. AJTR
BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no optimal treatment strategy for ostial left anterior descending (LAD) or ostial left circumflex artery (LCx) lesions. This study explored effectiveness and safety of drug-coated balloons (DCB) in individuals presenting with ostial LAD or LCx lesions. METHODS: A total of 137 patients with de novo ostial LAD or LCx lesions scheduled for DCB treatment were prospectively recruited into the study. After mandatory lesion preparation, DCB-only or hybrid strategy [DCB + drug-eluting stent (DES)] were performed on 120 patients (87.59%). The primary endpoint was the rate of 2-year target lesion revascularization (TLR). Rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and vessel thrombosis were explored as the secondary outcomes. Quantitative coronary angiography software was used to analyze coronary angiograms. RESULTS: Of the participants, 58 were treated with DCB-only and 62 with hybrid strategy. Relative to the DCB-only group, patients in the hybrid group had longer target lesions (15.47 ± 10.08 vs. 36.85 ± 9.46 mm, P<0.001) and higher Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) scores (23.47 ± 5.22 vs. 29.98 ± 3.18, P<0.001). During follow-up (731 ± 64 days), neither the primary endpoint (TLR) nor the secondary endpoints (including MACE, cardiac death, TVMI, and vessel thrombosis) differed statistically between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Treatment strategy (DCB-only or hybrid) was not a significant risk factor for TLR. Patients who underwent DCB-only exhibited less late lumen loss compared with the patients who underwent hybrid strategy (-0.26 ± 0.59 vs. 0.42 ± 0.47 mm, P<0.001) at 1-year angiographic follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: With regards to safety and efficacy, the strategy of DCB as a standalone therapy was similar in comparison with the hybrid strategy of DCB + DES for ostial LAD and ostial LCx lesions. This approach might be effective and technically easy in treating ostial LAD and LCx diseases. AJTR
Authors: Beatriz Vaquerizo; Eduardo Fernández-Nofreiras; Inmanol Oategui; Javier Suarez de Lezo; José Ramón Rumoroso; Pedro Martín; Helen Routledge; Helena Tizón-Marcos Journal: J Interv Cardiol Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Marco Valgimigli; Héctor Bueno; Robert A Byrne; Jean-Philippe Collet; Francesco Costa; Anders Jeppsson; Peter Jüni; Adnan Kastrati; Philippe Kolh; Laura Mauri; Gilles Montalescot; Franz-Josef Neumann; Mate Petricevic; Marco Roffi; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Stephan Windecker; Jose Luis Zamorano; Glenn N Levine Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-01-14 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Rosli Mohd Ali; Ralf Degenhardt; Robaayah Zambahari; Damras Tresukosol; Wan Azman Wan Ahmad; Haizal bin Haron Kamar; Sim Kui-Hian; Tiong Kiam Ong; Omar bin Ismail; Safari bin Elis; Wasan Udychalerm; Hanns Ackermann; Michael Boxberger; Martin Unverdorben Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: Stephen Worthley; Randall Hendriks; Matthew Worthley; Alan Whelan; Darren L Walters; Robert Whitbourn; Ian Meredith Journal: Cardiovasc Revasc Med Date: 2015-08-10