| Literature DB >> 36245992 |
Xinliang Gu1,2,3, Yu Zhang1,2,3, Yuejiao Huang1,4, Shaoqing Ju2.
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is a malignant tumor of the gastrointestinal system. Since the early symptoms of GC are not obvious and lack efficient diagnostic markers, it is urgent to find new diagnostic markers with good sensitivity and specificity. tRNA-derived small RNAs (tsRNAs) are an emerging class of small noncoding RNAs with good abundance in body fluids. We aim to find new tsRNAs as biomarkers for GC diagnosis.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36245992 PMCID: PMC9553536 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8438726
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oncol ISSN: 1687-8450 Impact factor: 4.501
Figure 1The expression profile of tsRNAs in GC tissues. (a) Heat map of differential tsRNAs in three pairs of GC tissues and adjacent nontumor tissues analyzed by tsRNA sequencing. (b) Differential expression map of tsRNAs in three pairs of GC tissues and adjacent nontumor tissues analyzed by tsRNA sequencing. (c) Online validation of tRF-17-WS7K092 in TCGA stomach adenocarcinoma database. (d) Expression level of tRF-17-WS7K092 in twenty pairs of GC tissues. (e) Expression level of tRF-17-WS7K092 in GC cells. ∗∗P < 0.01.
Figure 2Potential of serum tRF-17-WS7K092 as a diagnostic and prognostic marker. (a) The expression level of serum tRF-17-WS7K092 in GC patients (N = 136), gastritis patients (N = 40), and healthy donors (N = 136). (b) Comparison of the serum tRF-17-WS7K092 expression level in GC patients before and after surgery. (c) Comparison of the serum tRF-17-WS7K092 expression level between postoperative GC patients and healthy donors. (d) Kaplan-Meier method verifies the prognostic value of tRF-17-WS7K092. nsP > 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.
Clinicopathological analysis of tRF-17-WS7K092.
| Parameter | No. of patients | tRF-17-WS7K092 (high) | tRF-17-WS7K092 (low) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 99 | 52 | 47 | 0.335 |
| Female | 37 | 16 | 21 | ||
|
| |||||
| Age (year) | <60 | 36 | 17 | 19 | 0.697 |
| ≥60 | 100 | 51 | 49 | ||
|
| |||||
| Tumor size | <5 | 98 | 44 | 54 | 0.056 |
| ≥5 | 38 | 24 | 14 | ||
|
| |||||
| Differentiation grade | Well-moderate | 63 | 27 | 36 | 0.122 |
| Poor-undifferentiation | 73 | 41 | 32 | ||
|
| |||||
| T stage | T1-T2 | 71 | 27 | 44 | 0.004∗∗ |
| T3-T4 | 65 | 41 | 24 | ||
|
| |||||
| Lymph node status | Positive | 85 | 52 | 33 | 0.001∗∗ |
| Negative | 51 | 16 | 35 | ||
|
| |||||
| TNM stage | I-II | 76 | 28 | 48 | 0.001∗∗ |
| III-IV | 60 | 40 | 20 | ||
|
| |||||
| Nerve/vascular invasion | Positive | 84 | 50 | 34 | 0.005∗∗ |
| Negative | 52 | 18 | 34 | ||
∗∗ P < 0.01.
Figure 3Evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of serum tRF-17-WS7K092 in GC. (a) ROC analysis of tRF-17-WS7K092, CEA, CA199, and CA724 in the independent diagnosis of GC patients and healthy donors. (b, c) ROC analysis of tRF-17-WS7K092, CEA, CA199, and CA724 in the joint diagnosis of GC patients and healthy donors. (d) ROC analysis of tRF-17-WS7K092, CEA, CA199, and CA724 in the independent diagnosis of GC patients and gastritis patients. (e, f) ROC analysis of tRF-17-WS7K092, CEA, CA199, and CA724 in the joint diagnosis of GC patients and gastritis patients.
The diagnostic performance of tRF-17-WS7K092, CEA, CA199, and CA724 in differentiating GC patients from healthy donors.
| SEN | SPE | ACCU | PPV | NPV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tRF-17-WS7K092 | 0.77 (105/136) | 0.84 (114/136) | 0.81 (219/272) | 0.83 (105/127) | 0.79 (114/145) |
| CEA | 0.60 (81/136) | 0.71 (96/136) | 0.65 (177/272) | 0.67 (81/121) | 0.64 (96/151) |
| CA199 | 0.51 (69/136) | 0.80 (109/136) | 0.65 (178/272) | 0.72 (69/96) | 0.62 (109/176) |
| CA724 | 0.56 (76/136) | 0.74 (101/136) | 0.65 (177/272) | 0.68 (76/111) | 0.63 (101/161) |
| tRF-17-WS7K092+CEA | 0.90 (122/136) | 0.60 (81/136) | 0.75 (203/272) | 0.69 (122/177) | 0.85 (81/95) |
| tRF-17-WS7K092+CA199 | 0.91 (124/136) | 0.68 (92/136) | 0.79 (216/272) | 0.74 (124/168) | 0.88 (92/104) |
| tRF-17-WS7K092+CA724 | 0.90 (123/136) | 0.63 (86/136) | 0.77 (209/272) | 0.71 (123/173) | 0.87 (86/99) |
| tRF-17-WS7K092+CEA+CA199 | 0.95 (129/136) | 0.49 (67/136) | 0.72 (196/272) | 0.65 (129/198) | 0.91 (67/74) |
| tRF-17-WS7K092+CEA+CA724 | 0.96 (131/136) | 0.44 (60/136) | 0.70 (191/272) | 0.63 (131/207) | 0.92 (60/65) |
| tRF-17-WS7K092+CEA+CA199+CA724 | 0.98 (133/136) | 0.38 (51/136) | 0.68 (184/272) | 0.61 (133/218) | 0.94 (51/54) |
SEN: sensitivity; SPE: specificity; ACCU: overall accuracy; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value.
Figure 4Prediction of the downstream regulation mechanism of tRF-17-WS7K092. (a) The potential target genes of tRF-17-WS7K092. (b) Functional enrichment analysis of GO of the potential target genes. (c) Enrichment analysis of the KEGG biological pathway of the potential target genes.