Literature DB >> 23572188

Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.

Hideaki Shimada1, Tamaki Noie, Manabu Ohashi, Koji Oba, Yutaka Takahashi.   

Abstract

The aim of this review was to evaluate the clinical significance of serum tumor markers, particularly CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4, in patients with gastric cancer. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE with the keywords "gastric cancer" and "tumor marker," to select 4,925 relevant reports published before the end of November 2012. A total of 187 publications contained data for CEA and CA19-9, and 19 publications contained data related to all three tumor markers. The positive rates were 21.1 % for CEA, 27.8 % for CA19-9, and 30.0 % for CA72-4. These three markers were significantly associated with tumor stage and patient survival. Serum markers are not useful for early cancer, but they are useful for detecting recurrence and distant metastasis, predicting patient survival, and monitoring after surgery. Tumor marker monitoring may be useful for patients after surgery because the positive conversion of tumor markers usually occurs 2-3 months before imaging abnormalities. Among other tumor markers, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is useful for detecting and predicting liver metastases. Moreover, CA125 and sialyl Tn antigens (STN) are useful for detecting peritoneal metastases. Although no prospective trial has yet been completed to evaluate the clinical significance of these serum markers, this literature survey suggests that combinations of CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4 are the most effective ways for staging before surgery or chemotherapy. In particular, monitoring tumor markers that were elevated before surgery or chemotherapy could be useful for detection of recurrence or evaluation of the response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23572188     DOI: 10.1007/s10120-013-0259-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.370


  68 in total

1.  CEA, CA 19-9, and CA-50 in monitoring gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  D Pectasides; A Mylonakis; M Kostopoulou; M Papadopoulou; D Triantafillis; J Varthalitis; M Dimitriades; A Athanassiou
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.339

2.  Biological aggressiveness of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-positive gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sumiya Ishigami; Shoji Natsugoe; Hiroshi Nakashima; Koki Tokuda; Akihiro Nakajo; Hiroshi Okumura; Masataka Matsumoto; Saburo Nakashima; Shuichi Hokita; Takashi Aikou
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2006 May-Jun

3.  Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  M J Gaspar; I Arribas; M C Coca; M Díez-Alonso
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

4.  Preoperative positivity of serum tumor markers is a strong predictor of hematogenous recurrence of gastric cancer.

Authors:  D Marrelli; E Pinto; A De Stefano; G de Manzoni; M Farnetani; L Garosi; F Roviello
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Prognostic value of combination assays for CEA and CA 19-9 in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Y Ikeda; H Oomori; N Koyanagi; M Mori; T Kamakura; S Minagawa; H Tateishi; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.935

6.  Predictive value of preoperative serum sialyl Tn antigen levels in prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  I Takahashi; Y Maehara; T Kusumoto; M Yoshida; Y Kakeji; H Kusumoto; M Furusawa; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors in alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancers: analysis of 104 cases.

Authors:  Xiaowen Liu; Yufan Cheng; Weiqi Sheng; Hongfen Lu; Yu Xu; Ziwen Long; Huiyan Zhu; Yanong Wang
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Comparison between clinical significance of serum proinflammatory proteins (IL-6 and CRP) and classic tumor markers (CEA and CA 19-9) in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Marta Lukaszewicz-Zając; Barbara Mroczko; Mariusz Gryko; Bogusław Kędra; Maciej Szmitkowski
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.984

9.  Clinical significance and prognostic value of CA72-4 compared with CEA and CA19-9 in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  M Ychou; J Duffour; A Kramar; S Gourgou; J Grenier
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.434

10.  Prognostic value of preoperative serum CEA level compared to clinical staging: II. Stomach cancer.

Authors:  H J Staab; F A Anderer; T Brümmendorf; A Hornung; R Fischer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  146 in total

1.  Three-year monitoring of serum p53 antibody during chemotherapy and surgery for stage IV rectal cancer.

Authors:  Takayuki Suzuki; Hideaki Shimada; Mitsunori Ushigome; Junichi Koike; Kimihiko Funahashi; Tetsuo Nemoto; Hironori Kaneko
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-26

2.  At which stage of gastric cancer progression do levels of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 increase? Application in advanced gastric cancer treatment.

Authors:  Eui Soo Han; Han Hong Lee; Jun Suh Lee; Kyo Young Song; Cho Hyun Park; Hae Myung Jeon
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.720

3.  Decreased Serum Concentration of Total IgG Is Related to Tumor Progression in Gastric Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Hiroaki Saito; Kozo Miyatani; Yusuke Kono; Yuki Murakami; Hirohiko Kuroda; Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Yoji Fukumoto; Shuichi Takano; Tomohiro Osaki; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 1.641

4.  Score of the preoperative absolute number of lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils as a prognostic indicator for patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Saito; Shota Shimizu; Yusuke Kono; Yuki Murakami; Yuji Shishido; Kozo Miyatani; Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Yoji Fukumoto; Keigo Ashida; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Early detection of nonperitoneal recurrence may contribute to survival benefit after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Keiichi Fujiya; Masanori Tokunaga; Rie Makuuchi; Noriyuki Nishiwaki; Hayato Omori; Wataru Takagi; Fumiko Hirata; Makoto Hikage; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Diagnostic staging laparoscopy in gastric cancer: a prospective cohort at a cancer institute in Japan.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Irino; Takeshi Sano; Naoki Hiki; Manabu Ohashi; Souya Nunobe; Koshi Kumagai; Satoshi Ida; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Circulating long non-coding RNAs HULC and ZNFX1-AS1 are potential biomarkers in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hai-Peng Xian; Zhong-Ling Zhuo; Yu-Jing Sun; Bin Liang; Xiao-Tao Zhao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  The utility of tumor marker combination, including serum P53 antibody, in colorectal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Ryuma Tokunaga; Yasuo Sakamoto; Shigeki Nakagawa; Naoya Yoshida; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Use of serum and peritoneal CEA and CA19-9 in prediction of peritoneal dissemination and survival of gastric adenocarcinoma patients: are they prognostic factors?

Authors:  M Hasbahceci; F U Malya; E Kunduz; M Guzel; N Unver; A Akcakaya
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Evaluation of serum HER2-ECD levels in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Katsunobu Oyama; Sachio Fushida; Tomoya Tsukada; Jun Kinoshita; Toshifumi Watanabe; Masatoshi Shoji; Shinichi Nakanuma; Koichi Okamoto; Seisho Sakai; Isamu Makino; Keishi Nakamura; Hironori Hayashi; Masafumi Inokuchi; Hisatoshi Nakagawara; Tomoharu Miyashita; Hidehiro Tajima; Hiroyuki Takamura; Itasu Ninomiya; Hirohisa Kitagawa; Takashi Fujimura; Ryousuke Tajiri; Akishi Ooi; Tetsuo Ohta
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.