| Literature DB >> 36243707 |
Shuping Wang1, Yutao Wang2, Riyue Yu1, Dingxiang Yuan1, Yaofeng Ni1, Lixin Wang1, Man Sun3, Xin Wang4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Relationship between lipid profile and periodontitis has been reported. However, the association between lipid parameters and edentulism is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between lipid profile and reported edentulism in the elder population using a national cohort.Entities:
Keywords: Elder population; LDL cholesterol; Lipid profile; Reported edentulism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36243707 PMCID: PMC9571461 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02492-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 3.747
Fig. 1Flowchart of this current study
Characteristics of this study
| Characteristics | Non reported edentulism | Reported edentulism | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants, No | 2846 | 254 | |
| Age, years | 71.91(5.58) | 72.63(6.12) | 0.049 |
| Men, n (%) | 1463(51.4) | 118(46.5) | 0.148 |
| Education, n (%) | |||
| Primary or below | 2381(83.8) | 223(88.1) | 0.195 |
| Middle school | 282(9.9) | 19(7.5) | |
| High school or above | 177(6.2) | 11(4.3) | |
| Marriage status, n (%) | |||
| Married | 2121(74.5) | 181(71.3) | 0.316 |
| Unmarried | 25(0.9) | 1(0.4) | |
| Others | 700(24.6) | 72(28.3) | |
| Smoking status, n (%) | |||
| Never | 1618(56.9) | 149(58.7) | 0.831 |
| Current | 872(30.7) | 76(29.9) | |
| Former | 354(12.4) | 29(11.4) | |
| Drinking status, n (%) | |||
| > once a month | 664(23.3) | 53(20.9) | 0.503 |
| ≤ once a month | 173(6.1) | 13(5.1) | |
| No drinking | 2007(70.6) | 188(74.0) | |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 959(33.8) | 77(30.3) | 0.286 |
| Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 271(9.7) | 18(7.2) | 0.245 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 182(6.4) | 13(5.1) | 0.491 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.42(3.99) | 22.97(3.34) | 0.106 |
| Obesity, n (%) | 270(11.1) | 17(7.9) | 0.181 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 193.30(38.34) | 197.44(40.65) | 0.101 |
| LDL-C, mg/dL | 116.91(34.52) | 122.48(37.45) | 0.015 |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 52.02(15.91) | 52.20(15.78) | 0.865 |
| nonHDL-C, mg/dL | 141.27(38.15) | 145.24(40.77) | 0.115 |
| Remnant cholesterol, mg/dL | 23.34(11.62) | 22.62(9.01) | 0.338 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 125.96(90.20) | 118.57(70.62) | 0.204 |
Data are presented as mean (SD), or number (proportion)
BMI, body mass index; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Characteristics of the matched population
| Characteristics | Non reported edentulism | Reported edentulism | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants, No | 416 | 208 | |
| Age, years | 72.08(5.59) | 72.66(6.09) | 0.235 |
| Men, n (%) | 165(39.7) | 95(45.7) | 0.177 |
| Education, n (%) | |||
| Primary or below | 380(91.3) | 183(88.0) | 0.408 |
| Middle school | 24(5.8) | 17(8.2) | |
| High school or above | 12(2.9) | 8(3.8) | |
| Marriage status, n (%) | |||
| Married | 290(69.7) | 149(71.6) | 0.751 |
| Unmarried | 4(1.0) | 1(0.5) | |
| Others | 122(29.3) | 58(27.9) | |
| Smoking status, n (%) | |||
| Never | 256(61.5) | 118(56.7) | 0.51 |
| Current | 111(26.7) | 63(30.3) | |
| Former | 49(11.8) | 27(13.0) | |
| Drinking status, n (%) | |||
| > once a month | 85(20.4) | 45(21.6) | 0.854 |
| ≤ once a month | 19(4.6) | 11(5.3) | |
| No drinking | 312(75.0) | 152(73.1) | |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 120(28.8) | 59(28.4) | 0.975 |
| Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 19(4.6) | 13(6.2) | 0.48 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 19(4.6) | 12(5.8) | 0.648 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.29(3.59) | 23.04(3.34) | 0.394 |
| Obesity, n (%) | 37(8.9) | 17(8.2) | 0.88 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 190.47(35.66) | 197.76(40.93) | 0.022 |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 115.00(31.45) | 122.53(37.69) | 0.009 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 56.45(15.90) | 52.62(16.06) | 0.005 |
| nonHDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 134.02(34.90) | 145.14(40.83) | < 0.001 |
| Remnant cholesterol, mg/dL | 20.16(8.86) | 22.40(9.36) | 0.004 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 101.64(71.66) | 116.30(72.38) | 0.017 |
Data are presented as mean (SD), or number (proportion)
BMI, body mass index; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Fig. 2Distribution of lipid parameters in the whole and matched population
Association between lipid profiles and tooth loss in the whole population
| Unadjusted model | Adjusted model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | |
| LDL cholesterol | 1.005(1.001–1.008) | 0.014 | 1.004(1.001–1.008) | 0.046 |
| HDL cholesterol | 1.001(0.992–1.008) | 0.911 | 1.001(0.992–1.010) | 0.838 |
| Remnant cholesterol | 0.994(0.981–1.006) | 0.393 | 0.992(0.976–1.006) | 0.302 |
| nonHDL cholesterol | 1.003(0.999–1.006) | 0.099 | 1.002(0.999–1.006) | 0.211 |
| Total cholesterol | 1.003(1.000–1.006) | 0.092 | 1.003(0.999–1.006) | 0.187 |
| Triglycerides | 0.999(0.997–1.001) | 0.241 | 0.999(0.996–1.002) | 0.172 |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval
Age, sex, education level, marriage status, smoking status, drinking, BMI level, hypertension or not, dyslipidemia or not, diabetes or not were adjusted in model
Fig. 3Association of lipid parameters and tooth loss risk in the matched population