| Literature DB >> 36242012 |
Soon Su Shin1, Eun Hye Yang2, Hyo Choon Lee2, Seong Ho Moon2, Jae-Hong Ryoo3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Environmental exposure to benzene and toluene is a suspected risk factor for metabolic disorders among the general adult population. However, the effects of benzene and toluene on blood lipid profiles remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the association between urinary blood lipid profiles and metabolites of benzene and toluene in Korean adults.Entities:
Keywords: Benzene; Dyslipidemia; Hypertriglyceridemia; Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS); Lipid profiles; Toluene
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36242012 PMCID: PMC9569087 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14319-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 4.135
Baseline characteristics of the study population
| Characteristics | Total | Males | Females | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 45.88 (± 0.52) | 45.23 (± 0.53) | 46.55 (± 0.82) | 0.034 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.26 (± 0.10) | 24.87 (± 0.13) | 23.64 (± 0.12) | < 0.001 | |
| Education, n (%) | None | 106 (3.10) | 16 (1.04) | 90 (4.76) | 0.708 |
| ≤ High school | 2056 (60.06) | 878 (57.27) | 1178 (62.33) | ||
| ≥ College | 1261 (36.84) | 639 (41.68) | 622 (32.91) | ||
| Marital status, n (%) | Single | 408 (11.92) | 235 (15.33) | 173 (9.15) | < 0.001 |
| Married, cohabited | 2653 (77.51) | 1218 (79.45) | 1435 (75.93) | ||
| Other (divorce, separation) | 362 (10.58) | 80 (5.22) | 282 (14.92) | ||
| Household income (US dollars), n (%) | < 871 | 610 (17.82) | 245 (15.98) | 365 (19.31) | 0.012 |
| 871–2614 | 1366 (39.91) | 639 (41.68) | 727 (48.47) | ||
| 2614–4357 | 876 (25.59) | 395 (25.77) | 481 (25.45) | ||
| ≥ 4357 | 556 (16.24) | 249 (16.24) | 307 (16.24) | ||
| Unknown | 15 (0.44) | 5 (0.33) | 10 (0.53) | ||
| Smoking, n (%) | Never | 2166 (63.28) | 372 (24.27) | 1794 (94.92) | < 0.001 |
| Former | 689 (20.13) | 649 (42.33) | 40 (2.12) | ||
| Current | 568 (16.59) | 512 (33.40) | 56 (2.96) | ||
| Alcohol, n (%) | Never drinker | 658 (19.22) | 127 (8.28) | 531 (28.10) | < 0.001 |
| Drinker | 2765 (80.78) | 1406 (91.72) | 1359 (71.90) | ||
| Exercise, n (%) | No | 901 (26.32) | 801 (52.25) | 1100 (58.20) | 0.002 |
| Low intensity | 266 (7.77) | 122 (7.96) | 144 (7.62) | ||
| Moderate intensity | 1266 (36.99) | 610 (39.79) | 646 (34.18) | ||
| Urinary metabolites (µg/g⋅creatinine) | ttMA | 163.11 (± 7.38) | 148.83 (± 5.62) | 177.86 (± 12.70) | 0.025 |
| BMA | 12.31 (± 3.44) | 7.26 (± 0.47) | 17.53 (± 6.88) | 0.136 | |
| Blood lipid levels | TC (mg/dL) | 186.10 (± 0.87) | 185.87 (± 1.49) | 186.33 (± 0.99) | 0.804 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 170.27 (± 3.35) | 198.55 (± 4.98) | 141.06 (± 2.76) | < 0.001 | |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 56.14 (± 0.43) | 51.57 (± 0.50) | 60.86 (± 0.52) | < 0.001 | |
| aLDL-C (mg/dL) | 98.12 (± 0.83) | 98.31 (± 1.47) | 97.93 (± 0.88) | 0.830 | |
| TG/HDL-C ratio | 3.51 (± 0.09) | 4.33 (± 0.13) | 2.66 (± 0.07) | < 0.001 | |
| aLDL-C/HDL-C ratio | 1.83 (± 0.02) | 1.97 (± 0.04) | 1.70 (± 0.02) | < 0.001 | |
The continuous variables are presented as mean ± (standard deviation), and the categorical variables are presented as n (%). Urinary metabolites levels were presented after creatinine adjustment. aLDL was calculated by the Friedewald formula after excluding persons with TG > 400 (mg/dL). BMI, body mass index; ttMA, trans,trans-muconic acid; BMA, benzylmercapturic acid; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein | |||||
Odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for dyslipidemia according to quartiles of urinary metabolites of benzene and toluene among Korean adults (n = 3423)
| Hypercholesterolemia | Hypertriglyceridemia | Low level of HDL-C | aHigh level of LDL-C (≥ 130 mg/dL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Urinary ttMA | ||||||||
| Q1 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Q2 | 1.269 (0.805–2.001) | 1.194 (0.745–1.919) | 1.610 (1.233–2.101) | 1.433 (1.107–1.856) | 1.093 (0.821–1.455) | 1.047 (0.771–1.422) | 0.827 (0.568–1.204) | 0.774 (0.528–1.134) |
| Q3 | 0.857 (0.546–1.345) | 0.867 (0.556–1.353) | 1.547 (1.164–2.055) | 1.397 (1.037–1.881) | 0.852 (0.641–1.133) | 0.813 (0.605–1.092) | 0.692 (0.485–0.987) | 0.681 (0.475–0.976) |
| Q4 | 0.886 (0.580–1.403) | 0.878 (0.545–1.417) | 1.750 (1.383–2.213) | 1.599 (1.231–2.077) | 1.035 (0.758–1.414) | 1.069 (0.771–1.482) | 0.637 (0.439–0.925) | 0.654 (0.446–0.961) |
| 0.158 | 0.215 | 0.055 | 0.087 | 0.676 | 0.953 | 0.017 | 0.053 | |
| Urinary BMA | ||||||||
| Q1 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Q2 | 1.025 (0.654–1.607) | 1.013 (0.657–1.561) | 1.128 (0.857–1.484) | 1.486 (1.105–1.998) | 1.065 (0.796–1.425) | 0.906 (0.678–1.212) | 0.841 (0.612–1.155) | 0.806 (0.581–1.119) |
| Q3 | 0.817 (0.499–1.336) | 0.753 (0.460–1.230) | 1.195 (0.891–1.604) | 1.579 (1.129–2.208) | 1.124 (0.835–1.514) | 0.780 (0.589–1.033) | 0.736 (0.516–1.050) | 0.619 (0.430–0.889) |
| Q4 | 0.809 (0.490–1.334) | 0.770 (0.459–1.294) | 0.989 (0.722–1.353) | 1.338 (0.946–1.894) | 1.258 (0.962–1.646) | 0.812 (0.623–1.058) | 0.785 (0.533–1.154) | 0.668 (0.440–1.015) |
| 0.241 | 0.192 | 0.559 | 0.821 | 0.088 | 0.180 | 0.398 | 0.109 | |
aParticipants with TG levels > 400 mg/dL were excluded from LDL-C analysis (n = 3230). Adjusted model was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, education level, marital status, household income level, smoking, alcohol consumption, and exercise. ttMA, trans,trans-muconic acid; BMA, benzylmercapturic acid; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein; TG: triglyceride | ||||||||
β and 95% confidence intervals for lipid profiles according to quartiles of urinary metabolites of benzene and toluene in the Korean adult (n = 3423)
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Urinary ttMA | ||||||||
| Q1 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Q2 | 0.00 (-0.02, 0.03) | -0.01 (-0.03, 0.02) | 0.14 (0.05, 0.23) | 0.08 (0.01, 0.15) | -0.03 (-0.06, 0.01) | -0.01 (-0.04, 0.02) | -0.03 (-0.07, 0.01) | -0.05 (-0.08, -0.01) |
| Q3 | -0.01 (-0.03, 0.01) | -0.01 (-0.04, 0.01) | 0.10 (0.01, 0.18) | 0.04 (-0.03, 0.11) | 0.01 (-0.02, 0.05) | 0.02 (-0.01, 0.05) | -0.06 (-0.10, -0.02) | -0.06 (-0.10, -0.03) |
| Q4 | 0.00 (-0.02, 0.02) | -0.01 (-0.03, 0.02) | 0.19 (0.12, 0.27) | 0.13 (0.06, 0.20) | -0.01 (-0.04, 0.03) | -0.01 (-0.04, 0.03) | -0.05 (-0.09, -0.02) | -0.06 (-0.10, -0.02) |
| 0.932 | 0.979 | 0.225 | 0.159 | 0.186 | 0.853 | 0.325 | < 0.001 | |
| Urinary BMA | ||||||||
| Q1 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Q2 | -0.01 (-0.03, 0.01) | -0.01 (-0.03, 0.01) | -0.01 (-0.08, 0.07) | 0.06 (-0.01, 0.12) | 0.05 (0.01, 0.08) | 0.02 (-0.01, 0.05) | -0.03 (-0.07, 0.01) | -0.04 (-0.08, -0.01) |
| Q3 | 0.00 (-0.02, 0.02) | -0.02 (-0.04, -0.01) | 0.01 (-0.06, 0.09) | 0.06 (-0.01, 0.11) | 0.06 (0.03, 0.10) | 0.04 (0.01, 0.07) | -0.05 (-0.09, -0.01) | -0.09 (-0.13, -0.05) |
| Q4 | -0.03 (-0.05, -0.01) | -0.04 (-0.06, -0.01) | -0.02 (-0.11, 0.06) | 0.03 (-0.03, 0.10) | 0.05 (0.01, 0.08) | 0.02 (-0.01, 0.06) | -0.07 (-0.12, -0.02) | -0.10 (-0.14, -0.05) |
| 0.055 | < 0.001 | 0.684 | 0.361 | 0.989 | 0.052 | 0.115 | < 0.001 | |
aParticipants with TG levels > 400 mg/dL were excluded from LDL-C analysis (n = 3230). Adjusted model was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, education level, marital status, household income level, smoking, alcohol consumption and exercise. ttMA, trans,trans-muconic acid; BMA, benzylmercapturic acid; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein | ||||||||
β and 95% confidence intervals for lipoprotein ratio according to quartiles of urinary metabolites of benzene and toluene among Korean adults (n = 3423)
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Urinary ttMA | ||||
| Q1 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Q2 | 0.13 (0.03, 0.24) | 0.07 (-0.01, 0.16) | -0.01 (-0.06, 0.04) | -0.03 (-0.08, 0.01) |
| Q3 | 0.07 (-0.04, 0.17) | 0.03 (-0.06, 0.12) | -0.07 (-0.12, -0.02) | -0.09 (-0.13, -0.04) |
| Q4 | 0.11 (0.01, 0.21) | 0.11 (0.02, 0.20) | -0.07 (-0.12, -0.01) | -0.06 (-0.11, -0.01) |
| 0.093 | 0.044 | 0.002 | 0.003 | |
| Urinary BMA | ||||
| Q1 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Q2 | -0.05 (-0.15, 0.04) | 0.04 (-0.03, 0.01) | -0.08 (-0.14, -0.03) | -0.07 (-0.12, -0.02) |
| Q3 | -0.05 (-0.15, 0.04) | 0.02 (-0.05, 0.12) | -0.12 (-0.17, -0.07) | -0.14 (-0.19, -0.09) |
| Q4 | -0.07 (-0.18, 0.04) | 0.01 (-0.08, 0.09) | -0.12 (-0.18, -0.06) | -0.13 (-0.19, -0.08) |
| 0.216 | 0.999 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
aParticipants with TG levels > 400 mg/dL were excluded from LDL-C analysis (n = 3230). Adjusted model was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, education level, marital status, household income level, smoking, alcohol consumption and exercise. ttMA, trans,trans-muconic acid; BMA, benzylmercapturic acid; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein | ||||