Literature DB >> 14623617

Use of metabolic markers to identify overweight individuals who are insulin resistant.

Tracey McLaughlin1, Fahim Abbasi, Karen Cheal, James Chu, Cindy Lamendola, Gerald Reaven.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance is more common in overweight individuals and is associated with increased risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. Given the current epidemic of obesity and the fact that lifestyle interventions, such as weight loss and exercise, decrease insulin resistance, a relatively simple means to identify overweight individuals who are insulin resistant would be clinically useful.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of metabolic markers associated with insulin resistance and increased risk for cardiovascular disease to identify the subset of overweight individuals who are insulin resistant.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: General clinical research center. PATIENTS: 258 nondiabetic, overweight volunteers. MEASUREMENTS: Body mass index; fasting glucose, insulin, lipid and lipoprotein concentrations; and insulin-mediated glucose disposal as quantified by the steady-state plasma glucose concentration during the insulin suppression test. Overweight was defined as body mass index of 25 kg/m2 or greater, and insulin resistance was defined as being in the top tertile of steady-state plasma glucose concentrations. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was used to identify the best markers of insulin resistance; optimal cut-points were identified and analyzed for predictive power.
RESULTS: Plasma triglyceride concentration, ratio of triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations, and insulin concentration were the most useful metabolic markers in identifying insulin-resistant individuals. The optimal cut-points were 1.47 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) for triglyceride, 1.8 in SI units (3.0 in traditional units) for the triglyceride-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, and 109 pmol/L for insulin. Respective sensitivity and specificity for these cut-points were 67%, 64%, and 57% and 71%, 68%, and 85%. Their ability to identify insulin-resistant individuals was similar to the ability of the criteria proposed by the Adult Treatment Panel III to diagnose the metabolic syndrome (sensitivity, 52%, and specificity, 85%).
CONCLUSIONS: Three relatively simple metabolic markers can help identify overweight individuals who are sufficiently insulin resistant to be at increased risk for various adverse outcomes. In the absence of a standardized insulin assay, we suggest that the most practical approach to identify overweight individuals who are insulin resistant is to use the cut-points for either triglyceride concentration or the triglyceride-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14623617     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-10-200311180-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  273 in total

1.  Light-to-moderate alcohol intake reduces lipid accumulation product and attenuates its relation to hypertension.

Authors:  I Wakabayashi
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Modulatory effect of high saturated fat diet-induced metabolic disturbances on angiogenic response in hepatocyte RXRα knockout mice.

Authors:  Urszula Raźny; Łukasz Wątor; Anna Polus; Beata Kieć-Wilk; Yu-Jui Yvonne Wan; Grzegorz Dyduch; Romana Tomaszewska; Aldona Dembińska-Kieć
Journal:  Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.024

Review 3.  Insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic youth.

Authors:  Kara Mizokami-Stout; Melanie Cree-Green; Kristen J Nadeau
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.243

4.  Plasma lipid concentrations in nondiabetic African American adults: associations with insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Elizabeth Stein; Harvey Kushner; Samuel Gidding; Bonita Falkner
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.694

Review 5.  Metabolic syndrome: demographic features, etiology, and clinical management.

Authors:  Kathleen L Wyne
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  Cardiac allograft vasculopathy and insulin resistance--hope for new therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Luciano Potena; Hannah A Valantine
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.741

Review 7.  The metabolic syndrome: time for a critical appraisal. Joint statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.

Authors:  R Kahn; J Buse; E Ferrannini; M Stern
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  Establishment of a cut-point value of serum TNF-alpha levels in the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Carmen M Gurrola-Díaz; Sergio Sánchez-Enriquez; Edith Oregon-Romero; Pedro M García-López; Pedro Garzón de la Mora; Blanca E Bastidas-Ramírez; Mercedes González-Hita; José F Muñoz-Valle
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.352

9.  Diagnosis of insulin resistance in hypertensive patients by the metabolic syndrome: AHA vs. IDF definitions.

Authors:  C-M Hwu; C A Hsiung; K-D Wu; W-J Lee; K-C Shih; J Grove; Y-D I Chen; B L Rodriguez; J D Curb
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  Lipid effects of psychiatric medications.

Authors:  Junzo Watanabe; Yutaro Suzuki; Toshiyuki Someya
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.