| Literature DB >> 36235574 |
Samia Squizani1, Jeferson Jantsch1, Fernanda da Silva Rodrigues1, Matheus Filipe Braga2, Sarah Eller3, Tiago Franco de Oliveira3, Alexandre Kleber Silveira4, José Cláudio Fonseca Moreira1,4, Marcia Giovenardi1,3, Marilene Porawski1,5, Renata Padilha Guedes1,3.
Abstract
Zinc (Zn) plays an important role in metabolic homeostasis and may modulate neurological impairment related to obesity. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of Zn supplementation on the intestinal microbiota, fatty acid profile, and neurofunctional parameters in obese male Wistar rats. Rats were fed a cafeteria diet (CAF), composed of ultra-processed and highly caloric and palatable foods, for 20 weeks to induce obesity. From week 16, Zn supplementation was started (10 mg/kg/day). At the end of the experiment, we evaluated the colon morphology, composition of gut microbiota, intestinal fatty acids, integrity of the intestinal barrier and blood-brain barrier (BBB), and neuroplasticity markers in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. Obese rats showed dysbiosis, morphological changes, short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) reduction, and increased saturated fatty acids in the colon. BBB may also be compromised in CAF-fed animals, as claudin-5 expression is reduced in the cerebral cortex. In addition, synaptophysin was decreased in the hippocampus, which may affect synaptic function. Our findings showed that Zn could not protect obese animals from intestinal dysbiosis. However, an increase in acetate levels was observed, which suggests a partial beneficial effect of Zn. Thus, Zn supplementation may not be sufficient to protect from obesity-related dysfunctions.Entities:
Keywords: cafeteria diet (CAF); gut microbiota; inflammation; obesity; short-chain fatty acid (SCFA); zinc (Zn)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235574 PMCID: PMC9571896 DOI: 10.3390/nu14193921
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Crypt depth measurement in the proximal portion of the colon of control (CT) and cafeteria diet (CAF)-fed rats. (A) Crypt depth was reduced following CAF. (B) Representative images of each group of the colon stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The dashed lines indicate crypt length. Scale bar: 200 μm. The text box indicates significant differences shown by two-way ANOVA regarding the effects of the diet (CT and CT + Zn vs. CAF and CAF + Zn) and Zn treatment (CT and CAF vs. CT + Zn and CAF + Zn). n = 3–5 animals/group, 10 measurements per animal.
Figure 2Composition of the gut microbiota of control (CT) and cafeteria diet (CAF)-fed animals. (A) Heatmap shows the phylum and genera levels of the main bacterial community found in the fecal samples of the intestinal colon. The range of colors, from green to lilac, indicates the abundance of each phylum or genera per group. (B) Chao1 diversity index. The text box indicates significant differences shown by two-way ANOVA regarding the effects of the diet (CT and CT + Zn vs. CAF and CAF + Zn). n = 4–8 animals/group.
Figure 3Short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentration in the proximal portion of the colon of control (CT) and cafeteria diet (CAF)-fed rats. (A) Acetate, (B) butyrate, (C) propionate, (D) isobutyrate, (E) valerate, and (F) isovalerate levels. The text box indicates significant differences shown by two-way ANOVA regarding the effects of diet (CT and CT + Zn vs. CAF and CAF + Zn), Zn supplementation (CT and CAF vs. CT + Zn and CAF + Zn), and the interaction between diet and Zn supplementation. Multiple comparisons were performed by Bonferroni post hoc test and significant differences are shown by the asterisk (* p < 0.05). n = 4–7 animals/group.
Medium-chain fatty acid (MCFA), long-chain fatty acid (LCFA) and very long-chain fatty acid (VLCFA) concentrations in the proximal portion of the colon (µg/mg).
| Fatty Acid | Classification | CT | CT + Zn | CAF | CAF + Zn | Two-Way ANOVA Results | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interaction | Diet | Zn | Bonferroni’s Post Hoc Test | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Caprylic | Saturated | 9.36 ± 4.14 | 5.78 ± 1.00 | 3.36 ± 0.93 | 3.67 ± 0.90 | 0.0479 | |||
| Decanoic | Saturated | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.23 ± 0.04 | 0.65 ± 0.17 | 0.51 ± 0.10 | ns | 0.0065 | ns | ns |
| Octanoic | Saturated | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.09 ± 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.08 | 0.19 ± 0.09 | ns | 0.0326 | ns | ns |
| Lauric | Saturated | 1.86 ± 0.31 | 1.44 ± 0.36 | 8.207 ± 2.05 | 5.72 ± 2.54 | ns | 0.0025 | ns | ns |
| Undecanoic | Saturated | 19.35 ± 3.12 | 11.07 ± 2.25 | 16.99 ± 1.42 | 19.49 ± 1.62 | 0.0254 | ns | ns | CT vs. CT + Zn (0.0285) |
|
| |||||||||
| Elaidic | Unsaturated trans fatty acid | 61.41 ± 13.43 | 48.10 ± 15.02 | 244.9 ± 40.66 | 223.6 ± 44.51 | ns | 0.0001 | ns | ns |
| Heptadecanoic | Saturated | 3.71 ± 0.91 | 3.73 ± 0.99 | 3.82 ± 0.93 | 3.38 ± 1.24 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| Linoleic | Unsaturated | 110.7 ± 18.36 | 76.81 ± 23.58 | 458.9 ± 114.2 | 322.6 ± 109.3 | ns | 0.0009 | ns | ns |
| Myristic | Saturated | 2.37 ± 0.85 | 2.50 ± 0.89 | 8.48 ± 0.89 | 5.77 ± 0.47 | ns | 0.0001 | ns | ns |
| Palmitic | Saturated | 28.83 ± 7.76 | 39.78 ± 9.52 | 47.52 ± 9.32 | 86.56 ± 27.04 | ns | 0.0049 | ns | ns |
| Pentadecanoic | Saturated | 14.21 ± 2.05 | 13.43 ± 1.07 | 18.61 ± 5.09 | 12.84 ± 1.22 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| Stearic | Saturated | 59.69 ± 11.16 | 60.76 ± 10.34 | 34.22 ± 5.74 | 39.11 ± 4.99 | ns | 0.0179 | ns | ns |
| Myristoleic | Unsaturated | 29.96 ± 7.17 | 33.63 ± 7.39 | 52.10 ± 7.96 | 40.38 ± 10.15 | 0.0215 | ns | ns | ns |
| Tridecanoic | Saturated | 6.96 ± 1.52 | 4.98 ± 0.48 | 5.90 ± 1.03 | 5.65 ± 0.97 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| |||||||||
| Behenic | Saturated | 31.91 ± 7.10 | 32,14 ± 7.29 | 122.0 ± 33.77 | 182.6 ± 32.56 | ns | 0.0001 | ns | ns |
| Tricosanoic | Saturated | 25.90 ± 6.64 | 23.64 ± 3.88 | 43.57 ± 13.66 | 38.23 ± 13.53 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| Heneicosanoic | Saturated | 11.31 ± 2.75 | 6.23 ± 2.05 | 27.86 ± 5.99 | 19.42 ± 4.10 | ns | 0.0012 | ns | ns |
| Lignoceric | Saturated | 12.68 ± 5.60 | 33.14 ± 7.72 | 19.64 ± 7.05 | 16.92 ± 5.35 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. p values are described when significant differences were found. ns (non-significant); CT (control diet); CAF (cafeteria diet); Zn (zinc). n = 5/7 animals/group.
Figure 4Protein expression of zonula occludens 1 (ZO-1) and claudin-5 in cerebral cortex (A,B), hippocampus (C,D), and proximal portion of the intestinal colon (E,F) in control (CT) and cafeteria diet (CAF)-fed rats. Representative bands of each group are shown on the top of the graphs. β-actin or nonspecific bands were used as a loading control. The text box indicates significant differences shown by two-way ANOVA regarding effects of the diet (CT and CT + Zn vs. CAF and CAF + Zn). n = 4–7 animals/group.
Figure 5Protein expression of synaptophysin and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the cerebral cortex (A) and hippocampus (B,C) of control (CT) and cafeteria diet (CAF)-fed rats. Representative bands of each group are shown on the top of the graphs. β-actin or nonspecific bands were used as a loading control. The text box indicates significant differences shown by two-way ANOVA regarding the effects of diet (CT and CT + Zn vs. CAF and CAF + Zn). n = 4–7 animals/group.