| Literature DB >> 36235554 |
Da-Mee Kim1, Bo-Mi Kim1, Kyung-Hee Kim1.
Abstract
Food-related content varies widely and is increasingly popular. Using various media, teenagers can easily access food content, which could affect they eating habits. This study was conducted to confirm the effects of watching motivation on the relationship between food content watching time and eating habits among adolescents in Seoul, Korea. Exactly 806 participants were surveyed about their food content watching status, including watching time and watching motivation. The Nutrition Quotient for adolescents (NQ-A) questionnaire was used to confirm eating habits. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to classify watching motivation's subfactors. A parallel multimedia model was used to analyze the effect of watching motivation on the relationship between food content watching time and eating habits. As a result of this study, following the factor analysis, watching motivation was classified into information acquisition, emotional satisfaction, and enjoyment. The influence of food content watching time on NQ-A scores through information acquisition motivation was positively significant, whereas that through emotional satisfaction motivation was negatively significant. Enjoyment motivation did not indirectly affect the relationship between food content watching time and NQ-A scores. Hence, attention should be paid to these mediating factors when analyzing the relationship between watching food-related content and eating habits. Developing and distributing content that meets viewing motivations should help improve adolescents' eating habits.Entities:
Keywords: Nutrition Quotient for adolescents (NQ-A); adolescents; eating habits; food content; watching motivation; watching time
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235554 PMCID: PMC9572136 DOI: 10.3390/nu14193901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Factor and reliability analysis of food-related content watching motives.
| Type | Items | Factors | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Information seeking | Food content provides me with recipe information | 0.852 | ||
| Food content provides me with new ingredient information | 0.766 | |||
| Food content provides me with information on how to eat deliciously | 0.758 | |||
| Emotional | While watching food content, I feel like I am eating, and I feel vicarious satisfaction | 0.765 | ||
| Watching food content while eating food makes the food seem more delicious | 0.756 | |||
| Watching food content while eating food makes you not feel lonely even if you eat alone | 0.622 | |||
| Watching food content relieves stress | 0.584 | |||
| Enjoyment | I watch food content to kill time | 0.808 | ||
| I watch food content for fun | 0.801 | |||
| Eigenvalues | 2.090 | 2.018 | 1.680 | |
| % of variance | 23.227 | 22.418 | 18.666 | |
| Cumulative of % | 23.227 | 45.646 | 64.311 | |
| Cumulative of % | 0.771 | 0.711 | 0.604 | |
| KMO = 0.801, Bartlett’s χ2 = 1946.443, df = 36, | ||||
The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) method was used to measure sample appropriateness. Bartlett’s test of sphericity and total variance explained were used in the factor analysis evaluation.
General characteristics of the subjects and the use of food-related content (N = 806).
| Mean ± SD or n(%) | |
|---|---|
| Age (year) | 15.6 ± 1.6 |
| Gender | |
| Male | 343 (42.6) |
| Female | 463 (57.4) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.9 ± 4.0 |
| Content type | |
| Mukbang | 403 (50.0) |
| Cookbang | 243 (30.1) |
| ASMR | 94 (11.7) |
| SNS food image or video | 57 (7.1) |
| Other | 9 (1.1) |
| Route * | |
| YouTube | 746 (80.8) |
| SNS | 91 (9.9) |
| TV | 59 (6.4) |
| Internet broadcast | 24 (2.6) |
| Other | 3 (0.3) |
| Food content watching time (min/day) | 47.3 ± 51.1 |
| NQ-A score | 51.6 ± 10.8 |
| Food content watching motives | |
| Information seeking | 8.6 ± 2.9 |
| Emotional satisfaction | 11.2 ± 3.4 |
| Enjoyment | 6.9 ± 1.8 |
Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage). Mukbang: online audiovisual broadcast in which a creator or host eats foods. ASMR (autonomous sensory meridian response): a video that stimulates hearing by maximizing the delicate sound of eating food. SNS: social network services. NQ-A: Nutrition Quotient for adolescents. * Multiple response available.
Pearson’s correlation matrix of the variables of interest.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Watching time | 1 | −0.022 | 0.181 *** | 0.303 *** | 0.282 *** | 0.077 * | −0.042 | 0.073 * |
| 2. NQ-A score | 1 | 0.145 *** | −0.022 | −0.001 *** | 0.026 | −0.051 | −0.238 *** | |
| 3. Information seeking | 1 | 0.450 *** | 0.338 *** | 0.088 * | −0.168 *** | 0.019 | ||
| 4. Emotional satisfaction | 1 | 0.399 *** | 0.034 | −0.125 *** | 0.060 | |||
| 5. Enjoyment | 1 | 0.022 | −0.053 | 0.102 ** | ||||
| 6. BMI | 1 | −0.346 *** | 0.193 *** | |||||
| 7. Gender | 1 | −0.136 ** | ||||||
| 8. Age | 1 |
Food content watching time was converted using logs for normal distribution. For categorical variables such as gender, the biserial correlation method was used. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05
Figure 1Mediation analysis with the hypothesized mediators of food content watching motives. Values indicate unstandardized coefficients from Hayes’ method. Gender, age and BMI are adjusted for the model. Food content watching timeis converted using logs for normal distribution. Values from food content watching time to Nutrition Quotient for adolescents (NQ-A) score are the direct effects of food content watching time to NQ-A score. Values from food content watching time to mediators (food content watching motives) are the direct effects offood content watching timeon mediators. Values from mediators to NQ-A score are the indirect effects of mediators on the relationship between food content watching motives and NQ-A score. →: Significant pathway, ⇢: Non-significant pathway.
Mediating effect pathway of food-related content watching motives in the relationship between food-related content watching time and nutritional quotient.
| B | S.E. | t | 95%CI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLCI | ULCI | ||||||
| IV to mediator | |||||||
| Watching time | → | Information seeking | 0.521 | 0.103 | 5.041 *** | 0.318 | 0.723 |
| Watching time | → | Emotional satisfaction | 1.054 | 0.118 | 8.915 *** | 0.822 | 1.286 |
| Watching time | → | Enjoyment | 0.510 | 0.062 | 8.204 *** | 0.388 | 0.632 |
| Mediator to DV | |||||||
| Information seeking | → | NQ-A score | 0.693 | 0.145 | 4.796 *** | 0.409 | 0.977 |
| Emotional satisfaction | → | NQ-A score | −0.291 | 0.128 | −2.277 * | −0.542 | −0.040 |
| Enjoyment | → | NQ-A score | −0.043 | 0.232 | −0.184 | −0.499 | 0.414 |
Gender, age and BMI are adjusted for the model. Food content watching timeis converted using logs for normal distribution. IV: independent variable (Watching time), DV: dependent variable (NQ-A score), B: unstandardized coefficient. SE: standard error. LLCI: lower limit in 95% confidence interval. ULCI: upper in 95% confidence interval. *** p < 0.001, * p < 0.05
Models of the effect of adolescents’ food content watching time on nutrition quotient with mediators of food content watching motives.
| Variables | B | S.E. | 95%CI | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLCI | ULCI | |||||||||
| Total effect of IV on DV | ||||||||||
| Watching time | → | NQ-A score | −0.138 | 0.383 | −0.890 | 0.613 | ||||
| Direct effect of IV on DV | ||||||||||
| Watching time | → | NQ-A score | −0.171 | 0.403 | −0.962 | 0.621 | ||||
| Total indirect effect of IV on DV through proposed mediator | 0.032 | 0.160 | −0.281 | 0.349 | ||||||
| Indirect effect of IV on DV through proposed mediator | ||||||||||
| Watching time | → | Information seeking | → | NQ-A score | 0.032 | 0.160 | −0.281 | 0.349 | ||
| Watching time | → | Emotional satisfaction | → | NQ-A score | 0.032 | 0.160 | −0.281 | 0.349 | ||
| Watching time | → | Enjoyment | → | NQ-A score | −0.022 | 0.122 | −0.266 | 0.218 | ||
Gender, age and BMI are adjusted for the model. Food content watching time is converted using logs for normal distribution. IV: independent variable (Watching time), DV: dependent variable (NQ-A score), B: unstandardized coefficient. SE: standard error. LLCI: lower limit in 95% confidence interval. ULCI: upper limit in 95% confidence interval. Bootstrap results for indirect effect.