| Literature DB >> 36234257 |
Alice Hospodková1, Jakub Čížek2, František Hájek1,3, Tomáš Hubáček1, Jiří Pangrác1, Filip Dominec1, Karla Kuldová1, Jan Batysta1,3, Maciej O Liedke4, Eric Hirschmann4, Maik Butterling4, Andreas Wagner4.
Abstract
A set of GaN layers prepared by metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy under different technological conditions (growth temperature carrier gas type and Ga precursor) were investigated using variable energy positron annihilation spectroscopy (VEPAS) to find a link between technological conditions, GaN layer properties, and the concentration of gallium vacancies (VGa). Different correlations between technological parameters and VGa concentration were observed for layers grown from triethyl gallium (TEGa) and trimethyl gallium (TMGa) precursors. In case of TEGa, the formation of VGa was significantly influenced by the type of reactor atmosphere (N2 or H2), while no similar behaviour was observed for growth from TMGa. VGa formation was suppressed with increasing temperature for growth from TEGa. On the contrary, enhancement of VGa concentration was observed for growth from TMGa, with cluster formation for the highest temperature of 1100 °C. From the correlation of photoluminescence results with VGa concentration determined by VEPAS, it can be concluded that yellow band luminescence in GaN is likely not connected with VGa; additionally, increased VGa concentration enhances excitonic luminescence. The probable explanation is that VGa prevent the formation of some other highly efficient nonradiative defects. Possible types of such defects are suggested.Entities:
Keywords: GaN; MOVPE; defects; photoluminescence; positron annihilation spectroscopy
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234257 PMCID: PMC9572910 DOI: 10.3390/ma15196916
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Technological growth conditions of samples prepared for VEPAS measurement.
| Samples | Temperature | Precursor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N2 atmosphere | H2 atmosphere | ||
| TEN1 | TEH1 | 850 °C | TEGa |
| TEN2 | TEH2 | 900 °C | TEGa |
| TEN3 | TEH3 | 950 °C | TEGa |
| TMN1 | TMH1 | 950 °C | TMGa |
| TMN2 | TMH2 | 1025 °C | TMGa |
| TMN3 | TMH3 | 1100 °C | TMGa |
Figure 1(a) Structure of samples prepared for VEPAS and PL measurement, (b) Structure of samples prepared for SIMS.
Figure 2Implantation profiles of positrons with various energies into GaN. Labels indicate positron energy; z denotes the depth from the surface.
Figure 3An example of positron lifetime spectrum measured for the TEH1 sample and energy of incident positrons E = 10 keV. Solid line shows fit of the spectrum by model function. (a) Single-component fit yielding the mean positron lifetime; (b) Two-component fit considering contribution of free positrons (lifetime τ1) and positrons trapped at defects (lifetime τ2). Individual components are plotted by dashed lines.
Figure 4Dependence of the mean positron lifetime on the energy of incident positrons entering the GaN layer prepared under different growth conditions in (a) nitrogen and (b) hydrogen atmosphere. Upper x-axis shows the mean positron penetration depth.
Figure 5Breakdown results of positron lifetime spectra for sample TEH1 (a) lifetimes τ1 and τ2 of components resolved in spectra and (b) intensities I1 and I2 of the components. Dashed lines indicate calculated bulk positron lifetime and lifetimes of positrons trapped in various defects. The mean positron penetration depth is shown in the upper x-axis. The solid lines serve to guide the eye.
Figure 6Results of breaking down positron lifetime spectra for the TMH3 sample (a) lifetimes τ1 and τ2 of the components resolved in spectra and (b) intensities I1 and I2 of the components. Dashed lines indicate calculated bulk positron lifetime and the lifetimes of positrons trapped in various defects. The mean positron penetration depth is shown in the upper x-axis. The solid lines serve to guide the eye.
Figure 7(a) The development of the lifetime τ2 measured for the energy of incident positrons of 12 keV on different film deposition temperatures; (b) the concentration of VGa determined by VEPAS for samples prepared with growth parameters defined in Table 1. Labels indicate notation of sample and dominant type of defects in the sample. Solid lines are plotted to guide eyes only.
Figure 8Room-temperature photoluminescence spectra of samples TEN1 and TEH1.
Figure 9Maximum intensity of (a) excitonic and (b) yellow band luminescence as a function of VGa concentration.
Figure 10Concentration of (a) hydrogen and (b) carbon contamination measured by SIMS on layers prepared on multi-layered samples with technological parameters as defined in Table 1.