| Literature DB >> 36234025 |
Ayesha Nawaz1,2, Sher Zaman Safi1,3, Shomaila Sikandar2, Rabia Zeeshan1, Saima Zulfiqar1, Nadia Mehmood1, Hussah M Alobaid4, Fozia Rehman1, Muhammad Imran5, Muhammad Tariq6, Abid Ali7, Talha Bin Emran8,9, Muhammad Yar1.
Abstract
Background: Chronic wounds continue to be a global concern that demands substantial resources from the healthcare system. The process of cutaneous wound healing is complex, involving inflammation, blood clotting, angiogenesis, migration and remodeling. In the present study, commercially available alginate wound dressings were loaded with heparin. The purpose of the study was to enhance the angiogenic potential of alginate wound dressings and analyze the antibacterial activity, biocompatibility and other relevant properties. We also aimed to conduct some molecular and gene expression studies to elaborate on the mechanisms through which heparin induces angiogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: NIH3T3 fibroblasts; alginate; angiogenesis; antimicrobial; heparin; hydrogel; wound healing
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234025 PMCID: PMC9573464 DOI: 10.3390/ma15196683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1This figure shows the FTIR analysis of heparin (A), and other samples (B). In Figure 1B, the spectra of “alginate” represent control, “A” represents sample A, “B” represents sample B and “C” represents sample C in the spectral region (4000–500 cm−1).
Figure 2Shows swelling behaviors of hydrogels, where (A) represents the physical appearance of hydrogels before and after swelling while (B) represents the % degree swelling of hydrogels in PBS solution at 1 h and 24 h.
Figure 3Antibacterial activity of alginate and heparin loaded alginate hydrogels by agar diffusion method: Zones of inhibition of hydrogels against E. coli (A) and Staph. aureus (B).
Figure 4Shows biocompatibility of our biomaterials, where (A) shows the microscopic image of growing cells (indicated by the red arrows) in media with biomaterial while (B) represents the attachment of those cells with the fibers of samples.
Figure 5Shows cell viability of the heparin-loaded alginate dressings by Alamar Blue assay using Fibroblasts (NIH-3T3) cells with samples A, B and C vs. Controls at 570 nm wavelengths on days 1, 5 and 7 respectively.
Figure 6Expression of (A) VEGF and (B) cPGE synthase in different heparin (1 µg/mL, 5 µg/mL and 10 µg/mL) loaded hydrogels.
Figure 7The expression of (A) TNF-α and (B) IL-1β in Fibroblasts, treated with different concentrations of heparin (1 µg/mL, 5 µg/mL and 10 µg/mL).
Figure 8The migration rate of NIH3T3 cells determined by a scratch wound assay where (A) represents the microscopic images of migrating cells in different groups while (B) is the bar graph representing the migration rate in each group. Each bar indicates the mean of area covered when compared with the control.