Literature DB >> 17925636

A systematic review of heparin to treat burn injury.

Mark Oremus1, Mark D Hanson, Richard Whitlock, Edward Young, Carolyn Archer, Arianna Dal Cin, Alok Gupta, Parminder Raina.   

Abstract

This systematic review was conducted to assess the evidence for using heparin to treat burn injury. The following databases were searched for relevant studies: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Central Database of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and BIOSIS. Additional searches involved the reference lists of included studies, the "grey " literature (eg, government reports), and consultations with experts to obtain unpublished manuscripts. Included studies were summarized descriptively and in tabular form, and assessed for methodological quality. A metaanalysis was conducted to obtain a summary estimate for the association between heparin use and postburn mortality. Nine studies were abstracted and included in the review. Five studies contained adult and pediatric patients, one contained adults only, and three contained pediatric patients only. Burn etiologies included flame, scald, thermal, or smoke inhalation. Heparin administration was done topically, subcutaneously, intravenously, or via aerosol. Heparin was reported to have a beneficial impact on mortality, graft and wound healing, and pain control. For mortality, the overall estimate (relative risk) of heparin's effect was 0.32 (95% confidence interval = 0.18-0.57). Heparin's reported benefits may be severely biased because the abstracted studies were beset by poor methodological quality (eg, inadequate definitions of treatment and outcome, no control of confounding). Given poor study quality, there is no strong evidence to indicate that heparin can improve clinical outcomes in the treatment of burn injury. Further research is needed to assess the clinical utility of using heparin in the treatment of burn injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17925636     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181599b9b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  6 in total

Review 1.  Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.

Authors:  Jason Wasiak; Zephanie Tyack; Robert Ware; Nicholas Goodwin; Clovis M Faggion
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Efficacy of a protocol including heparin ointment for treatment of multikinase inhibitor-induced hand-foot skin reactions.

Authors:  Jian-ri Li; Chi-rei Yang; Chen-li Cheng; Hao-chung Ho; Kun-yuan Chiu; Chung-Kuang Su; Wen-Ming Chen; Shian-Shiang Wang; Chuan-Shu Chen; Cheng-Kuang Yang; Yen-chuan Ou
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Heparin in malignant glioma: review of preclinical studies and clinical results.

Authors:  Rosalie Schnoor; Sybren L N Maas; Marike L D Broekman
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis practice and its association with outcomes in Australia and New Zealand burns patients.

Authors:  Lincoln M Tracy; Peter A Cameron; Yvonne Singer; Arul Earnest; Fiona Wood; Heather Cleland; Belinda J Gabbe
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-02-11

5.  Heparin-Loaded Alginate Hydrogels: Characterization and Molecular Mechanisms of Their Angiogenic and Anti-Microbial Potential.

Authors:  Ayesha Nawaz; Sher Zaman Safi; Shomaila Sikandar; Rabia Zeeshan; Saima Zulfiqar; Nadia Mehmood; Hussah M Alobaid; Fozia Rehman; Muhammad Imran; Muhammad Tariq; Abid Ali; Talha Bin Emran; Muhammad Yar
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.748

6.  Heparin and related drugs: beyond anticoagulant activity.

Authors:  Clive Page
Journal:  ISRN Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.