| Literature DB >> 36232025 |
Giovanna Zimatore1,2, Maria Chiara Gallotta3, Matteo Campanella1, Piotr H Skarzynski4,5,6, Giuseppe Maulucci7,8, Cassandra Serantoni7,8, Marco De Spirito7,8, Davide Curzi9, Laura Guidetti9, Carlo Baldari1, Stavros Hatzopoulos10.
Abstract
Heart rate time series are widely used to characterize physiological states and athletic performance. Among the main indicators of metabolic and physiological states, the detection of metabolic thresholds is an important tool in establishing training protocols in both sport and clinical fields. This paper reviews the most common methods, applied to heart rate (HR) time series, aiming to detect metabolic thresholds. These methodologies have been largely used to assess energy metabolism and to identify the appropriate intensity of physical exercise which can reduce body weight and improve physical fitness. Specifically, we focused on the main nonlinear signal evaluation methods using HR to identify metabolic thresholds with the purpose of identifying a method which can represent a useful tool for the real-time settings of wearable devices in sport activities. While the advantages and disadvantages of each method, and the possible applications, are presented, this review confirms that the nonlinear analysis of HR time series represents a solid, robust and noninvasive approach to assess metabolic thresholds.Entities:
Keywords: Poincaré plot; heart rate variability; metabolic threshold; nonlinear dynamic; recurrence quantification analysis; sport; wearable devices
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36232025 PMCID: PMC9564658 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912719
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Research article reporting relationships between HR time series features and physical exercise.
| Authors | Physical Exercise | Non-Linear Method |
|---|---|---|
| Marwan et al., 2002 [ | Cycling | RQA |
| Censi et al., 2002 [ | Resting | RQA |
| Auber et al., 2003 [ | Cyclergometer | Frequency analysis |
| Tulppo et al., 1996 [ | Cyclergometer | Poincaré plot |
| Mourot et al., 2004 [ | Cyclergometer | Poincaré plot |
| Orellana et al., 2015 [ | Soccer | Descriptive analysis |
| Chen et al., 2015 [ | Cyclergometer | DFA |
| Singh 2019 [ | Resting | RQA, ApEn |
| Cottin et al., 2004 [ | Cyclergometer | Frequency analysis |
| Goya-Esteban et al., 2012 [ | Cyclergometer | DFA |
| Wittstein et al., 2019 [ | Treadmill | DFA |
| Hoshi et al., 2016 [ | Soccer, basketball, handball | RQA |
| Blasco-Lafarga et al., 2017 [ | Cyclergometer | DFA |
In the first column, the first author [ref] is reported.
Figure 1Heart rate variation (in beats per minute—bpm) of a healthy female subject during an incremental exercise (for more details see Appendix A.4).
Figure 2Spectral analysis of heart rate (HR) of a healthy female subject (the same as shown in Figure 1, for more details see Appendix A.4).
Figure 3(a) Poincaré plot of RR time series from a healthy subject at rest; (b) Poincaré plot of the same time series as in Figure 1 (for more details see Appendix A.4).
Figure 4Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA) of RR time series from a healthy subject (the same as shown in Figure 1, for more details see Appendix A.4).
Figure 5Unthresholded recurrence plot of the RR time series (ms) (light blue line) recorded as a breath-by-breath, from a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) device (Cosmed, Rome, Italy). The red and green lines show the change of pattern at the first and second threshold, respectively. On the horizontal and vertical axes, the j-th and i-th indices are reported, respectively. (For more details see in Appendix A.3 and Appendix A.4).
HR and metabolic thresholds.
| Authors | Subjects | Physical | HR Detection | Methods | Statistical | Gold Standard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buchheit et al., 2007 [ | 72 Trained boys, runners | Treadmill | CPET | Spectral analysis | HRVT2 vs. HRDP | Gas exchange |
| Karapetian et al., 2008 [ | 24 Healthy adults | Cyclergometer | Watch and chest belt | Time analysis | HRVT1 vs. VT1 for VO2 r = 0.89; | Gas exchange |
| Quinart et al., 2013 [ | 20 Obese adolescents | Cyclergometer | CPET | Spectral analysis | HRT1 at VT1 | Gas exchange |
| Cassirame et al., 2015 [ | 9 Healthy adults ski-mountaineers | Alpine skiing track | Chest belt Polar T61; portable recorder FRWD B100 | Time–frequency analysis | HRT2 vs. VT2 | Gas exchange |
| Vasconcellos et al., 2015 [ | 35 Adolescents (15 obese) | Cyclergometer | CPET | Time analysis RMSSD | HRVT1 vs. VT1 | Gas exchange |
| Ribeiro et al., 2018 [ | 13 Young soccer players | Treadmill | CPET | Graphics analysis (shift of RR interval) | HRVT2 vs. VT2 | Gas exchange |
| Nascimento et al., 2019 [ | 19 Male runners | Maximal incremental running test (MIRT) | Chest belt and watch | Poincaré plot, DFA (Dmax) | No correlation for HR1 at LT1 for HR; HRT2 at LT2 for HR r = 0.71 **; | Blood lactate |
| Novelli et al., 2019 [ | 68 Untrained subjects | Cyclergometer | Chest belt and watch Polar RS800CX | Time analysis, Poincaré plot | No significant difference ( | Gas exchange |
| Zimatore et al., 2020 [ | 20 Obese adults | Treadmill | CPET | RQA | HRVT1 vs. VT1 | Gas exchange |
| Stergiopoulos et al., 2021 [ | 15 Healthy adults | Treadmill, multistage running test (MSRT) | ECG TEL100, MP 100A Biopac | Time and apectral analysis | no statistically significant differences between the running speed at VT2 and EDRT (F (2,28) = 0.83, | Gas exchange |
| Zimatore et al., 2021 [ | 31 Healthy adolescents | Cyclergometer | CPET | RQA | HRVT1 vs. VT1 | Gas exchange |
| Rogers et al., 2021 [ | 17 Male adults | Treadmill | Chest belt Polar H7 | DFA | HRVT1 vs. VT1 | Gas exchange |
| Afroundeh et al., 2021 [ | 103 Young males | Treadmill | Chest belt Polar T31 | DFA, modified Dmax | HRVT1 at LT1 | Blood lactate |
For sake of simplicity, the first and the second thresholds obtained by HR are named HRVT1 and HRVT2, respectively; those obtained by the gas exchange method are named VT1 and VT2, those obtained by blood lactate method are named LT1 and LT2; HRDP is HR obtained by the HR deflection point; LoA, limits of agreement; MFO, maximal fat oxidation (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.001). * In the first column, the first author ref. is reported; ^ Olathe, KS, USA.
Figure 6How the threshold (lowest red point) is determined by the Dmax method: it is estimated by the longest perpendicular distance between SD1 (predicted by a third order polynomial function over actual value) from the linear regression calculated with the first and last values of the curve. The speed (km/h) corresponds to the treadmill velocity.
Figure 7From the subject to the method: a presentation of the principal limitations in the HR data processing. In the insets: ECG, Experimental set: treadmill and facemask, Quark RMR-CPET Cosmed, Rome, Italy.