| Literature DB >> 36230891 |
Abdiasis M Hussein1,2, Nanditaa Balachandar1,2,3, Julie Mathieu2,4, Hannele Ruohola-Baker1,2.
Abstract
Embryonic diapause is an enigmatic state of dormancy that interrupts the normally tight connection between developmental stages and time. This reproductive strategy and state of suspended development occurs in mice, bears, roe deer, and over 130 other mammals and favors the survival of newborns. Diapause arrests the embryo at the blastocyst stage, delaying the post-implantation development of the embryo. This months-long quiescence is reversible, in contrast to senescence that occurs in aging stem cells. Recent studies have revealed critical regulators of diapause. These findings are important since defects in the diapause state can cause a lack of regeneration and control of normal growth. Controlling this state may also have therapeutic applications since recent findings suggest that radiation and chemotherapy may lead some cancer cells to a protective diapause-like, reversible state. Interestingly, recent studies have shown the metabolic regulation of epigenetic modifications and the role of microRNAs in embryonic diapause. In this review, we discuss the molecular mechanism of diapause induction.Entities:
Keywords: cancer stem cells; embryonic diapause; epigenetics; mTOR; metabolism; quiescence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36230891 PMCID: PMC9562880 DOI: 10.3390/cells11192929
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 7.666
Figure 1Mouse early embryonic development and induction of diapause. A simplified depiction of mouse early embryonic development showing formation of zygote, two-cell, four-cell, and morula stage, followed by early blastocyst on embryonic day 3.5. In normal development, this is followed by formation of the late blastocyst on embryonic day 4.5 and uterine implantation of the embryo on day 6. This process is halted in embryonic diapause at the blastocyst stage on day 3.5; the embryo hatches from the zona pellucida, stays loosely attached to the uterine wall and remains viable without implanting. This figure was created with Biorender.com (accessed on 25 May 2022).
Changes in microRNAs and their target genes in diapause embryos compared with those in reactivated and post-implantation embryos.
| MicroRNA | Target Gene | Context++ Score Percentile |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| 75 |
|
|
| 75 |
|
|
| 87 |
|
|
| 87 |
|
|
| 85 |
|
|
| 84 |
|
|
| 83 |
|
|
| 83 |
|
|
| 83 |
|
|
| 85 |
|
|
| 83 |
|
|
| 82 |
|
|
| 84 |
|
|
| 84 |
|
|
| 83 |
Red: upregulation; blue: downregulation.
Figure 2Proposed model of embryonic diapause molecular regulation. Induction of diapause is caused by the elevated levels of Msx1, Egr1, and the glutamine transporters Slc38a1/2 and the downregulation of Myc and mTOR. The starvation-induced Lbk1–AMPK axis is also critical for mTOR inhibition. The microRNA let-7 is highly upregulated in diapause and induces embryonic diapause by inhibiting both Myc/mTORC1 and mTORC2. Msx can potentially repress mTOR, and Slc38a1/2 might also inhibit the activation of the mTOR complex. Downregulation of Tfcp2L1/Lbp9 and metabolic switch takes place during exit from diapause. Furthermore, mutation of the transcriptional repressor Hesx1 in diapause disrupts exit from embryonic diapause and continuation of embryonic development after implantation. This figure was created with biorender.com (accessed on 1 May 2022).